← Back to summary
Full Transcript
Toronto Tackles Accessibility Gaps Citywide - Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee - May 4, 2026
Toronto · May 08, 2026
Uh, good morning everyone. My name is
Councelor Jamal Meyers, the chair of the
Toronto Accessibility Advisory
Committee. The clerk has confirmed that
we have quorum and I'd like to call
meeting 17 of the of the Toronto
Accessibility Advisory Committee to
order. Welcome everyone. This meeting is
being held with the committee members
and staff participating both by video
conference and in person at city hall in
committee room 2. Members of the public
may also attend in person or observe the
meeting on YouTube. I ask everyone for
their patience today with any delays and
technical issues. We are also providing
captioning for this meeting. Max will be
our captioner today. I'd like to remind
everyone to please speak clearly today
to assist the captioner in capturing all
of our comments.
Reminder about microphones. Everyone,
please keep microphones on mute unless
you need to speak. Members, if you wish
to speak, please raise your hand or
unmute your microphone and let me know.
I will create a speaker list.
Reminders about videos. Members, for qu
purposes and participation in the
meeting, please keep your cameras on.
Staff and public speakers, please keep
your videos turned off until you need to
speak or answer questions. Reminders
about motions. Members, if you have any
motions, please submit in writing to the
clerk's office. The clerk's staff are
available at tac tac toronto.ca to help
with motions.
Now, I'll begin with the land
acknowledgement. Although we are in
different locations and meeting remotely
today, the committee would like to
acknowledge that the land we are meeting
on is a traditional territory of many
nations, including the Missagas of the
Credit, the Anesnab, the Chipoa, the
Hodosoni, and the Wendat peoples, and is
now home to many diverse First Nations,
Inuit, and Matei peoples. We also
acknowledge that Toronto is covered by
Treaty 13 with the Missosagas of the
credit.
Although the Municipal Conference of
Interest Act does not apply to the
Toronto Accessibility Advisory
Committee, I urge members out of an
abundance of caution declare anything
that could be perceived as a conflict of
interest.
Seeing none, we will move on. May I
please have a motion to confirm the
meeting minutes of the Toronto
Accessibility Advisory Committee meeting
held on February 27th, 2026.
Thank you. Moved by Howard Wax. All
those in favor? Opposed? carried.
I would like to introduce a new business
item, a presentation from Michelle Pang,
TWWA housing advocacy coordinator,
Nelly's, on breaking barriers, housing
access, housing access for women with
disabilities, centering lived
experiences in Toronto's affordable
housing system. I believe the clerk has
circulated the presentation last Friday.
All in favor of adding the item to the
agenda as a new business.
Thank you. All oppose. Carried. This
will be item DI17.5.
We now have five items on the agenda
today. Let's consider them according to
the order listed. So the first item is I
will give a overview of the chair's
report.
Just give me one second. Just pulling it
up.
So uh mental May 4th to May 10th is
mental health week. Uh mental health
week offers an important opportunity to
recognize the connection between mental
health and accessibility and the role
both play in supporting meaningful
inclusion. Mental health week encourages
us to reflect on accessibility in its
fullest sense. True accessibility
entails creating spaces where people
feel understood, respected, and able to
access supports and services without
stigma or barriers. As a committee, we
remain committed to identifying and
removing barriers, and to advancing
approaches that are responsive and
grounded in equity, supporting a city
where everyone can fully participate.
and
National Accessibility Week. I'm
apologies, there's a slight typo on the
chair's report. It actually goes from
May 30th to June 6th, I believe. Um, and
we are looking ahead to National
Accessibility Week later this month. Uh,
we celebrate its dedication to promoting
accessibility and inclusion and
recognize the contributions of persons
with disabilities in our communities.
This week offers an opportunity to
highlight the importance of removing
barriers and fostering inclusion across
all aspects of daily life. As a
committee, we remain committed to
working collaboratively to strengthen
accessibility and support ongoing
improvements across systems, services,
and community life in Toronto.
And finally, there is Access Fest
happening on June 6th. And I'm pleased
to see Access Fest return to it for its
second year, continuing to evolve as a
unique accessibility focused event in
Toronto. Organized by Access Now with
support from the city of Toronto, this
one-day festival brings together
accessibility, culture, and community
through performance, dialogue, and
interactive experiences. AccessFest
offers opportunities for meaningful
engagement and showcases accessibility
and action. It also provides a platform
to elevate diverse perspectives and
foster greater awareness as we continue
working towards a more inclusive and
barrier-free Toronto.
And then there's just a list of upcoming
events and opportunities uh coming up.
Does anybody have any questions on the
item?
Seeing none, are there any speakers on
this item? Hearing no further speakers,
I will move the motion to receive the
item for information. All those in
favor?
Opposed? That carries. Great. Members,
today we have Danny Brown, a senior. So
now we are on uh DI 17.2. to Tommy
Thompson, park visitor experience plan,
accessibility feedback members. Today we
have Danny Brown, senior project
manager, Waterfront Parks and
Recreation, City of Toronto, and Mary
Anne Young, senior project manager,
special projects, Toronto and region
Toronto region conservation authority to
give a presentation on Tommy Thompson
Park visitor experience plan.
Danny and Maryanne, I will turn it over
to you.
Thank you. Just getting our text set up.
Wonderful. Uh, good morning, Councelor
Myers, members of the committee. Uh, my
name is Danny Brown. I'm a senior
project manager for parks and recreation
on a team called Park Design Strategic
Projects. Uh, I'm joined today by
Maryanne Young, uh, my colleague at
Toronto Region Conservation Authority.
She's a senior project manager on the
special projects team. We're here today
to present an overview of the Tommy
Thompson Park visitor experience plan.
Uh this is an inprogress project which
is a joint collaboration between uh the
city of Toronto and the Toronto Region
Conservation Authority. Uh and we are
working closely with a consultant team
comprised of uh Lord Cultural Resources,
Third Party Public, DTA and Nasing
Consulting.
Apologies. Uh Tommy Thompson Park is a
very special place in Toronto. It was
formed by successes successive years of
lake filling at the base of Leslie
Street at the intersection of Leslie
Street and Unwin Avenue. Uh due to
originally conceived of as an extension
of Toronto's ports uh uses uh to support
expanding industrial development and
shipping in Toronto. Uh changing market
and societal conditions uh meant that
the port uses were no longer needed or
envisioned. And after uh decades of
citizen advocacy and activism, uh the
site was uh converted into a natural
area, an urban wilderness so to speak,
and allowed to succeed and support uh
habitat, ecological systems uh uh and uh
disposal of uh further lake filling and
dredgate from the Keading Channel, the
lower Dawn River, and other waterfront
uh spaces in Toronto. Since then, it has
grown into a beloved destination for uh
the young and the old alike. and we are
here today to discuss the visitor
experience plan uh to support its
evolution into uh a more beautiful and
more sustainable space into the future.
Tommy Thompson Park uh is a place where
Torononians and uh folks from across the
greater Toronto region uh come to
experience an urban wilderness on
Toronto's waterfront, undertake
environmental education programs. It's
also an important bird sanctuary uh and
a globally recognized biodiversity hot
spot. uh bird research and other natural
heritage research is conducted in Tommy
Thompson Park uh and is now a global
leader in ecological restoration and
stewardship and is a place where folks
can come to walk to cycle and to
experience greenery on Toronto's
waterfront. Importantly, it is a
car-free destination as well as a
pet-free destination.
For a little bit of background, the
Tommy Thompson Park Visitor Experience
Plan itself is an offshoot or an outcome
of a 2021 Toronto uh Tommy Thompson Park
update report that was sent to city
council in 2021. Uh that report uh
directed staff to establish a joint
management committee comprised of the
city of Toronto, Toronto region
conservation authority uh create ports
Toronto and the Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources and Forestry for the
management of Tommy Thompson Park itself
and the remainder of Leslie Street spit
which is the geography the park lands
on. Staff were also directed that at
that time to develop a coordinated and
comprehensive approach to the operations
and maintenance across the lands that
comprise the Leslie Street spit. More
specifically creating a visitor
experience plan that strikes the balance
between public access and ecological
integrity and as part of the development
of that plan undertake a community and
stakeholder consultation process
including engaging with the broader
indigenous community uh to inform the
visitor experience plan. All of this was
under the opices of uh attempting to
develop a coordinated policy and
enforcement approach uh speaking to
things like film permits uh dogs within
the park area trail conflicts between
users and similar issues as a result of
growing visitorship to the sensitive
area.
More specifically, the visitor
experience plan. Uh the goal of that
plan when we develop it is to ensure
that Tommy Thompson Park's user
experience befits its unique and
signature status as a regional
destination where visitors can
experience an urban wilderness on
Toronto's waterfront.
Tommy Thompson Park is a complicated
place uh that is uh divided into a
number of different ownerships. Uh there
are four distinct areas that comprise
the study area of Tommy Thompson Park's
visitor experience plan. So the the
Leslie Street spit which is the
geography on which Tommy Thompson Park
sits uh is divided into four uh spaces
uh related to their ownership. Number
one on this map is the largest component
uh that is Tommy Thompson Park proper.
It is owned by Toronto Region
Conservation Authority but it is jointly
managed between the TRCA and the city of
Toronto. Uh space number two which is
the diagonal hatch u moving from the
bottom left to the top right. Uh that is
land that is owned by the province
currently, the Ontario Ministry of
Natural Resources. Uh and the lands
themselves are still leased to the
Toronto Port Authority where there are
still continued dredging operations
underway in the park. Uh the third space
which is the stippled space on close to
the mainland that is the baselands and
wetwood area that is owned fully by the
city of Toronto primarily by Creatio.
And then the fourth smallest piece uh is
the most recent addition to the land
form of the Leslie Street Spit in the
top of the map here uh which is owned
jointly by the city of Toronto and TRCA
and was created as a result of the
expansion of the Ash Bridges Bay water
treatment facility and will be opening
this year to the public including a
shoreline trail. It's important to
understand the fragmented ownership and
accountability for Tommy Thompson Park
and the broader Leslie Street spit. Um
as uh it will be very important for the
implementation outcomes of this plan to
understand both the timing and the
organization uh to which uh for whom it
has responsibility uh to undertake the
improvements that may be suggested by
the plan. Specifically uh number two on
this map the uh portion of the Leslie
Street spit that is still owned by the
province. The long-term plan is for that
land to be transferred to the TRCA upon
the completion of lake filling and
dredging activity. Uh but we do not yet
have a concrete timeline for that
transfer. When that transfer is
complete, Tommy Thompson Park will be
deemed complete and we'll be able to
implement uh further outcomes of the
visitor experience plan. At this point,
I'll pass it on to my colleague Maryanne
to speak to you more specifically about
the visitor experience plan itself.
Thank you.
>> Great. Thank you, Danny.
So Danny gave a good explanation of how
the 2021 council direction has um
has has pushed TRCA and the city to
start this plan. Um, one other important
background thing about Tommy Thompson
Park is that there is an existing master
plan and environmental assessment that
was completed in 1992 that really drives
the ethos and the and how the park is um
managed and um what the park facilities
are today. And the four master plan
objectives are up on the screen here.
and they're really about um enhancing
and maintaining the natural environment
of Tommy Thompson Park that is so
important but also having uh
recreational opportunities and enhancing
those over time. So the visitor
experience plan will work within and
further
um
further realize the objectives of the
master plan from 1992.
A visitor experience plan in general is
about understanding how visitors use a
park now or a place now, what is and
isn't working and making a plan to
improve that in the future. So at Tommy
Thompson Park in particular, we're
really interested in understanding how
the users are using the park currently
and where there are conflicts and what
we can do to improve that. So, it's
really an implementation planning
exercise to look at projects and
priorities as well as timelines for
improving how visitors experience the
park. It's not intended to be a major
update to the master plan or an
invitation to suggest major changes to
the park. One of the things that's so
special about Tommy Thompson Park right
now is the fact that it is very natural
and um really gives people an
opportunity to experience nature so
close to the city.
In general, like I said, the visitor
experience plan is a framework that
guides how people can enjoy, navigate,
and connect with the place while
protecting the pieces that make it so
special, the natural and cultural
features.
So for the Tommy Thompson Park fear
experience plan, we're looking at the
environment, activities, interactions
between people and between people and
nature, learning opportunities,
comfort, and access.
some areas of focus that um that we've
defined and that we are getting input
from through engagement
um activities that are happening this
spring are looking at how people
understand and experience the park in
terms of its natural environment. How
people get to and move through the park.
um components of the park that may or
may not be accessibility,
sorry, accessible. Um people's safety
and well-being at the park. Um how
operation and maintenance affect
people's experience. Branding and
communications essentially, you know, is
the website. Are the and are the um the
signs at the park working?
Are the facilities and amenities
appropriate?
is the park uh inclusive and of course
our the programming and the events that
we have appropriate and suitable in
terms of aspects that we're really
looking for feedback on in terms of this
project are very concrete things such as
the signage. Is the signage working? Do
we need to change it? Is the wayfinding
working? um in particular relevance to
this committee from an accessibility
standpoint. How accessible is the park
and are there things that we can or
should be doing to to update facilities
or trails um or signage to improve that?
Um and other components again such as
you know do we need to update the
website? Do staff on site know what
they're doing and are they able to
assist visitors um when they're on site
and um have questions or concerns?
We do have a fairly wide-ranging
engagement program that we are
undertaking and I've got the six
engagement SL um objectives up on the
slide right now. But to summarize, we
are looking to get input from a broad
range of perspectives on the visitor
experience plan because we have a wide
range of people and community groups
that use the park right now. Um we have
um as as Danny will explain in a moment
um a few different types of engagement
that have happened and that will be
happening in order to get input from
different user groups such as runners,
cyclists, walkers,
um education program participants,
burers, other nature enthusiasts. And so
we want to be able to bring all of that
input in in a fair and um respectful way
and be transparent about how that input
input is um is driving the
recommendations that will be made as
part of the plan.
In terms of timeline, we're about
halfway through the process. So, this
project began last August and is
intended to or is scheduled to be
wrapped up by the end of December with
then reporting to the TRCA board of
directors and Toronto City Council in Q1
or Q2 of 2027.
So, it's a three-phase project. The
phase one which started in the summer
and went until April of this year was
really background research
um and the engagement program
development. We're now in the phase two
which is a first phase where we're doing
pretty in-depth engagement with um
community groups with the indigenous
community um with and with the public at
general. that will and that the end of
phase two will culminate with the draft
visitor experience guidelines in the
fall. Then we'll go back to all of the
groups to get more input and um have the
final visitor experience plan in the
fall.
I'll hand it back to Danny.
>> Thanks, Marian. We've already held two
pop-up engagements early in the uh
development of the visitor experience
plan to understand some baseline
feedback from the public. These two
pop-ups were held in the fall of last
year and they were held in Tommy
Thompson Park and we intercepted folks
as they were entering the park and asked
them some questions about uh the park.
We wanted to know what do they like
about their the park and it their
visitor experience, what don't they like
and then what opportunities are there
for improvement. Pretty basic, but it's
uh a good start to understand the
baseline uh feedback from people who are
actively using the park. Some of the uh
common themes that emerged from that
early, let's call it preliminary
engagement or pre-engagement include
that people loved coming to Tommy
Thompson Park to see nature. They really
like the park as it is. U we're
interpreting that to mean they like its
natural state. It's sort of relatively
quiet uh space. They like that it's
car-free. They like that it's pet free.
Uh and they like how close it is to
downtown Toronto. It's a place where you
can access nature less than a 15-minute
uh cycle or transit from downtown
Toronto. Some common themes emerged
around challenges for the visitor
experience at Tommy Thompson Park,
specifically around the lack of
maintenance and the in unavailability of
amenities like garbage bins or
washrooms. Uh there was also some
concern about trail conflicts which
echoes the city council report from 2021
uh where we're seeing a lot of conflicts
on the main spine trail specifically
between cyclists and pedestrians. And
there was concern about uh cyclists
accessing uh places in the park that
aren't supported uh or supportable by
cyclist, specifically the wilderness
trails off the main spine. Uh we also
heard common opportunities including
better signage both uh in terms of
behavioral signage but also educational
signage so people understood the spaces
in Tommy Thompson Park and what they're
looking at. And we also heard uh a
strong desire specifically for a
drinking fountain at the entrance.
There's a bottle filling station there
right now, but a water fountain
specifically is we think lowhanging
fruit that folks are looking for at the
entrance to the park. So, this starts to
highlight some of the things we're
thinking about in terms of the visitor
experience plan. Really concrete
improvements that don't overly change
the feeling or the nature of the park,
but still make it a more uh pleasant and
accessible and uh uh comfortable place
to visit.
In terms of the engagement program,
apologies for the color grading here uh
up on screen. It looks okay on my
screen, but um apologies. In any case,
uh the key participants of the
engagement program include the local
counselor, which is councelor Fletcher.
uh current park advocates and users, so
many community groups, uh visitors to
the park. Uh we have stakeholder
interviews with knowledge experts uh
including um Walter Chem who wrote a
book on the park, Lorraine Johnson who's
a naturalist and a former colonist for
the Toronto Star. Uh adjacent land
owners including the province and Ports
Toronto and create uh and we're
undertaking a number of different
engagement activities as part of the
broader engagement program. These
include as I already mentioned the key
informant interviews. We have an urban
indigenous sharing meeting coming up
this week. We are doing further on-site
pop-ups as I'll talk about in a minute.
We've assembled a community advisory
group comprised of user groups that are
active in the park as well as an open
invitation to indigenous uh people to
join that community advisory group.
We're having a community openhouse. Uh
and there is currently a survey that's
running. I'll get into more information
in a minute. Uh all of this engagement
program is supported by newsletters,
social media, uh web pages, web
presences, and on-site signage to make
sure that as many people as possible are
aware of this project and can submit
feedback. We are open to feedback at any
time. There's a web a website and an
email address set up for the project.
So, by no means do you have to follow
this engagement program. We're always
inviting feedback directly on this
project. This is my last slide. Uh just
a summary of some upcoming engagement
opportunities. We're really thrilled to
be able to be here today and advertise
and share uh these dates and
opportunities. Uh and I'm really glad
that we had quum today so we didn't miss
this opportunity. Um this Saturday will
be the Spring Bird Festival at Tommy
Thompson Park and there will be a pop-up
engagement event uh as part of that
festival this weekend. Next week on
Tuesday in the evening, we'll be hosting
an open house for the public at the
Ralph Thornton Community Center. Uh
that's at uh Queen and Salter uh on the
near east end of downtown just across
the Dawn River. We have a mailing list
that you can join for further updates
that can be accessed from TRCA's
website, tommy Thompsonpark.ca.
And there's an ongoing digital survey
hosted on the city of Toronto's Have
Your Say platform, uh, which can be
accessed at the link here, and it runs
until May 19th. Uh, but there's also uh
links to uh that have your say online
digital survey on the Tommy Thompson
Park website, on posters and newsletters
that have gone out, and on the city
social media pages as well. Uh you can
just Google it by typing in Tommy
Thompson Park visitor experience plan
have your say. Uh unfortunately uh the
link wasn't available when we submitted
the presentation. So the online version
of this presentation doesn't have that
link but as I mentioned it's easily
googleable and it's on the city's have
your say platform so you can find it
fair fairly easily. I hope I want to
thank uh the chair and the committee uh
for having us here today and we're more
than happy to take any questions. Our
contact information is here. Please
reach out at any time with feedback or
further questions. Thank you very much.
Thank you. Are there any questions?
Uh if you could Sorry, I can't see
Nav'i. Uh do you want to go ahead?
>> Oh,
>> yes. Thank you.
>> Oh, sorry. Apologies. Just hold that
question. We have public speakers on
this.
>> Uh and then I'll get and then I'll get
to your question.
>> So, the first public speaker we have is
Nicole Curado. Nicole, are you there?
>> Yes, I am here.
>> Okay, Nicole, go ahead. You have five
minutes, please.
>> What I was going to say is uh I find
parks to be very, very relaxing. I
absolutely love going to wooded areas
and areas along the waterfront and that
I'm on the autism spectrum and find it
very calming because there's not too
much sensory overload. So I think in
your design you need to
look at sensory accessibility and neuro
affirming trails. So that those are
things that you need to keep in mind and
also please keep in mind the needs of
wildlife and and trees because they've
been here first. So please make sure
everybody has
uh you know a safe and and
feels feels welcome there that everyone
feels safe and calm. And also
I think that there I noticed that there
needs to be proof bins to keep animals
out and to keep the placed clean. So
that's those are all things to to bear
in mind that you know that it's the
animal's home and that we're visiting
it. That's all I'm going to say that in
terms of accessibility make look at
neuroacility. That's all I'm saying.
>> Thank you Nicole. Uh does anybody have
any questions for the deputent?
No. Seeing none, thank you very much for
joining us. Uh and with that I will go
to Nav'i and Nav'i go ahead.
>> Hi good morning. Thanks Danny and
Maryanne for your presentation. Um I
know that you were see seeking some very
specific access uh feedback. I I I hope
this is within your purview or maybe you
don't if you would have the information
about I'm thinking about how people
access Tommy Thompson. So one is are
there access from um seating? Are there
opportunities for that throughout the
park? And also washroom access. I know
that there is one at the beginning of
the park. Is that considered that people
would take um despite the park being
like relatively small in nature, people
take multiple it could take longer or
need more opportunities for those breaks
and those washrooms being accessible,
not just portable. Are those uh things
being considered at this point or is
there a plan for that within the larger
plan?
Thank you Nav'i uh for the question.
Yes, both seating, access to the park,
uh seating and washrooms are all
components of visitor experience that we
are hoping to uh issue recommendations
for as part of the development of this
plan. Uh there are challenges with
introducing uh some services deep within
Tommy Thompson Park. Uh as I mentioned,
it is a lakefill site and so uh
extending site infrastructure like water
or electricity deep into the park is
quite a challenge. Moreover, the
ownership of the site currently makes it
difficult because of the uh province's
ownership of the outer portions of the
park currently. Um we are it is
difficult to introduce further amenities
deeper into the park until that
ownership is resolved. That being said,
there is uh seating and washrooms
available right now uh on the nearer
side of the park. And as I mentioned, as
part of the development of this plan, we
will be recommending and exploring
further accessibility features like
additional washrooms, potentially uh
seating, and uh improvements to the
gateway or access experience. We've
heard a lot from folks that the trip to
Tommy Thompson Park is quite
challenging. Uh Leslie Street is a
pretty active street, lots of trucks on
that street. Uh and so we're also
considering the moments outside the park
proper um as part of that accessibility
journey as well and thinking about how
do we actually get folks into the park
in a safe and comfortable way. Uh one
thing that I should mention that we've
been directed by city council to explore
is bringing back a shuttle service to
Tommy Thompson Park which may in part
support uh getting folks with uh
mobility challenges deeper into the
park. Uh it is a fairly extensive
journey. I just want to be uh honest
about that. It's about a it's a 5 kmter
one-way trip to the end of Tommy
Thompson Park, which is a 10 km round
trip if you're on the way back as well.
Um, and so that is a it's a very
challenging environment to get all the
way out to the end of the spit or the
end of the park. Um, and then to have to
make the journey all the way back um
without uh a ton of rest areas or shade.
And so we're certainly looking at that
full journey as part of the
accessibility spectrum um and access
spectrum for Tommy Thompson Park. So,
thank you very much for the feedback.
We'd love to hear more. or maybe you can
reach out uh by email and we can chat
further. Thank you.
>> Thank you, Nav'i. Does anybody else have
questions?
>> No. No. Okay. Thank you very much.
>> Thank you. Thank you.
Are there any would anyone like to speak
on the item?
No. Okay. Thank you.
Hearing no further speakers, I move to
receive the item for information. All
those in favor?
Oppose? Carried. Great. Thank you. Our
next item is DI17.3
FIFA World Cup 2026 Accessibility
Update. members. Today we have Sharon
Bullenback, executive director, and
Michael Brewer, project manager, games
at and events, FIFA World Cup 2026
secretariat to give an update on how
accessibility has been integrated into
venue and mobility planning for the FIFA
World Cup 2026 in Toronto. Sharon and
Michael, I will turn it over to you.
Good morning everyone. We will just get
our technology set up here.
>> Okay, thank you everyone. Uh so going to
walk through the the plans for
accessibility so far for the FIFA World
Cup this summer. Uh and we're going to
start with the the transportation
elements. So right from the the start of
the journey, how folks get to the venues
and then diving into a little bit uh
what sort of accommodations will be
available at the venues. So for those
who uh haven't seen the mobility plan
yet, just to set the context a little
bit, uh there's an extensive footprint
around the what we currently refer to as
Beimo Field and the Fort York Bentway
area where we'll be establishing the
Toronto Stadium and FIFA fan festival
this summer. Uh, one thing that I'll
call attention to is just the footprint
of Toronto Stadium there in the the
purple is much larger than just the
stadium alone. Um, there's a number of
elements of broadcast compounds and
hospitality spaces and other supporting
elements. So, the the footprint of the
venue will actually take up
significantly more space than just the
stadium alone.
and to support the operations and get
the the tens of thousands of people that
we need to in and out of the area. Uh
there's going to be a number of road
closures and we're promoting a transit
first approach to move the large numbers
of people. So I'll walk through the road
closures quickly so folks are aware. The
longest term one is the the small black
line on Fleet Street where we'll be
closing the roadway but maintaining the
street car tracks and building out
temporary TTC platforms which will be uh
designed to allow the ramps to be able
to deploy and and to an AODDA standard
so that we can use that fleet area as
the main hub for TTC drop offs for folks
going to Fan Festival and for anybody uh
going to Toronto Stadium who is able to
make the walk from that point. Uh beyond
that, the exhibition loop will remain
open only for uh people who have
accessibility requirements.
The next longest road closure is uh the
yellow portion of Fort York Boulevard
where the road will be closed and
pedestrianized when the FanFest is
active uh just to accommodate that
connection to the fleet hub and the the
large numbers of people entering the
venue.
Then on the match days are the the
largest impacts and so all of the red
lines. though Springhurst south of or
Duffren south of Springhurst Strong
south of East Liberty and Lakeshore from
Baurst to British Columbia will be
closed to general traffic. Um and the
orange dash lines represent within the
local areas of Liberty Village and Fort
York where we'll be enforcing local
access only during those road closure
periods. The match day closures will be
in effect from about 5 hours before
kickoff until three hours after the
final whistle. So about a 10-hour window
on match days.
So it's a bit of a challenging
environment that we're operating within.
And that's why we're recommending the
transit first approach to everyone. Uh
and so moving on to the accessible uh
components.
I'm sorry.
There we go. So,
obviously, GO trains, TTC buses, and
street cars do provide uh access for
those with mobility uh challenges. And
as I mentioned, we'll be maintaining the
exhibition loop for folks coming on the
TTC that need to be able to get uh
closer to the venue. and exhibition go
will be the the main point for anybody
coming on the go network.
uh the
fan festival area, that fleet hub area I
mentioned would be the the main point
for uh folks coming on the TTC. And if
folks come on the exhibition go side of
things, uh we will offer uh courtesy
shuttles, which we're just finalizing
arrangements for uh within the
exhibition place grounds.
Um,
one thing to call attention to, uh,
primarily for the folks in the Fort York
neighborhood is that on egress after
matches or or after FanFest, there is
potential for uh, crowding on street
cars. And so in that instance, there
would be uh customer service personnel
deployed to redirect folks uh to the
fleet hub because local stops uh between
fleet and king uh would be closed so
that the street cars can uh move express
beyond that point. And for anyone who
has uh concerns, mobility concerns in
that Fort York neighborhood, the TTC
will be expanding Wheel Trans uh
eligibility for the the time of the
tournament. Uh and then one other
measure just to ensure accessibility on
the go side is within exhibition GO
station there will be uh technicians on
hand should there be any issues with
elevators so they can be uh addressed
immediately on site.
Uh moving on beyond uh the conventional
transit, uh we are going to be at
Toronto Stadium in lot 851. And I can
show the location on the next slide of
where that is. It's just outside the
main entrance. Uh providing wheelr drop
off as close as we can get vehicles to
the the entrance to the venue. and FIFA
will be providing uh accessible parking
in the same space that can be uh
pre-booked for accessible ticket holders
for Fan Festival. The accessible drop
off they were looking is on Gazowski
Street uh which is just across the road
from just across Fort York Boulevard
from where the entrances to the venue
are.
Uh, and this map just quickly shows just
to the southeast there where the the
wheel trans and uh accessible
parking are for the stadium.
Once people arrive at one of these uh
transportation nodes or hubs, uh they
enter what's called our last mile. So
the walking routes that then connect
them to the stadium or the fan festival
itself. And so within our our hosting
requirements, we've been working closely
with FIFA on a number of things here.
The first one being ensuring minimum
widths of uh and and quality of the
paved surfaces connecting to the venue.
Um, Exhibition Place already has fairly
wide sidewalks in most places and where
there are any issues, we'll be
temporarily closing the roadways so that
we have uh additional width to
accommodate um the folks passing
through.
There's also requirements around
lighting. So, we're working through
ensuring that uh because some of our
games are 7:00 p.m. matches, they'll let
out uh around 9:00 p.m. or later. making
sure that at the end of the night the
the walking routes back to the transit
points are well lit.
Uh curbs are required uh in circulation
areas. So have been reviewing across
exhibition place to ensure that we meet
this requirement. And then tactile
paving is required at crossings to uh
live traffic. Um, and so also working
through this, although I'll note that
within that exhibition footprint, uh,
most of the the roads would be closed
and pedestrianized at that point. And
that would bring folks to the gates of
the venue. So, I'll pass it over to
Sharon to speak a little bit about what,
uh, they'll find at the venues.
>> Great. Thank you, Michael. Um, so I'm
going to cover off just as Michael said,
what uh what is going to be in place at
our our two key venues uh primarily the
Toronto Stadium as well as our fan
festival site at Fort York and the
Bentway. So, first of all, the stadium
here is um so here's a list of elements
um that will be incorporated into our
accessibility
plan for the Toronto stadium which will
include the following and that are
listed here. Uh as Michael talked about
the accessible parking, uh accessible
pickup and drop off areas for wheel
trans. Uh there will be support through
customer service, accessible seating
allocations um within the stadium itself
um as well as sensory services and there
was an email that was submitted
specifically around sensit uh sensory
services. So I will touch on this for a
bit. The intention is to provide um a
sensory trailer uh which would be design
a designated space um that is that it
will be soundproofed and allow for uh
low lighting, textural items on the
walls, bean bag chairs or other soft
seating to allow a space for folks to uh
get away from noise and and sensory
overload. Um as well there is intention
to provide sensory kits um which could
include a variety of things. I I don't
have the specifics on on what they will
include as of yet, but um typically they
would include noiseancelling headphones,
fidget toys, weighted blankets, and
textural items. So there is intention um
to provide these items at Toronto
Stadium during the event. The audio
descriptive commentary just to uh let
everyone know that it is our requirement
to provide uh that in both official
languages. So it will be provided in
English and French. Uh and um closed
captioning um closed and open
captioning, sorry. Uh adult changing
rooms, signed language commentary,
family accessible restrooms, uh
elevators and service animal relief
areas, and of course um other elements
that exist uh full-time in the building
of Toronto Stadium. that these elements
have been uh incorporated into our
stadium readiness work and will be
implemented by FIFA as they manage uh
the stadium during the specific
tournament dates.
And then just to speak to uh
accessibility at Fort York and the
Bentway. So there's a number of elements
uh that already exist um in order to
provide access for visitors to this site
um and they obviously will remain in
place and as a historic site there
certainly are some limitations um to
providing accessibility and we do
recognize that. Um so while there are
some challenges at this historic site
there are many areas and elements that
do allow for accessibility. So all the
walkways within the 7 acre uh walled
site are ashvalt surfaced and are
accessible for visitors using mobility
aids. Seating can be found in many of
the exhibit areas outside of the
structures and there will be picnic
table areas available as well. All
washrooms currently on site are
accessible. Uh and they are located in
the visitor center, the south soldiers
barracks on the lower floor of the blue
barracks uh which is accessible by an
via an elevator.
We do want to add that our our
secretariat team are working very
closely with access now to review um
accessibility plans and ensure
compliance and as a legacy and we will
continue that work. We we've built a
great relationship with Access Now and
and uh are grateful for our our our um
collaboration with them to continue to
review our plans and make sure that we
have as many things in place as
possible. As one of our legacy
initiatives, um we have provided funding
through the FIFA World Cup budget for an
accessibility in events playbook and
we're thrilled to be working with our
colleagues in EDC and providing uh
$100,000 in legacy funding to support
the development of this event's playbook
um that will incorporate lessons learned
from the World Cup, experiences that
have been um that have been uh realized
through the World Cup that we can create
a resource um for other event organizers
across the city. So it would be a guide
that provides tools and checklists uh as
well as training elements to help
organizers of other city events um
deliver fully inclusive and accessible
events across Toronto. So, we're we're
thrilled to be not only thinking about
what we need to do for the tournament
and during the tournament, but providing
a lens to the future and support for
other event organizers uh in the city as
part of our legacy work.
And just one final note uh around
sorry around fan festival um some other
elements that we are working on uh in
terms of added elements that we want to
add to the site. So all of our general
admission guest entrances um will be
accessible uh as will our premium guests
and media entrances. Uh we will also
feature live programming on site. So
part of FanFest is really to be the
central sort of celebration location for
all things football um during the World
Cup. And so we're welcoming guests to
come and view uh live match broadcasts
on large screens to come and experience
uh food and beverages and activations
and onstage programming and
entertainment. So, our onstage
programming, our live programming on
this on the stage will have closed
captioning. There'll be sign language
interpretation and there'll be
designated areas for accessible viewing.
We will be adding additional portable uh
toilets and washrooms on site that will
be accessible. Food and beverage bar
counters will have accessible heights
and we'll be working with our partners
who are activating on the site um for
their activation spaces whether that's
uh physical uh structures and or just
space in like our familyfriendly space.
um to make sure that uh these structures
and these activations are accessible,
including accessible ramps, non-slip
flooring, um and other elements that we
want to ensure are all incorporated into
the final design.
>> And then finally, just a note about uh
accessibility requirements in our
contract. So, it is noted here um that
the city of Toronto includes uh the
provisions that are listed here on this
slide in our contracts to ensure that
suppliers conform um to the requirements
that are in place, that they comply with
the city's accessibility standards,
policies, practices, and procedures, and
that suppliers require their personnel
to be fully trained. And so these have
all been built into our FIFA World Cup
2026 contracts
um which allow us to sort of have some
leverage uh with our suppliers to make
sure that what they are implementing
what they are responsible for delivering
as part of our um delivery of the World
Cup are accessible uh that they're being
mindful of the accessibility
requirements of the city and of the
province of Ontario and our work that
we're doing uh to deliver an accessible
event. And one last note uh just on our
host city ambassador volunteer training,
we are including accessibility training
uh for all of our volunteers that will
be part of the event as well.
>> Thank you very much. Um
we have three we have four speakers on
this item. I will ask the clerk to
confirm that our first speaker, Peter
Aensopoulos,
Athensopoulos is ready to proceed.
>> Can you hear me?
>> Yes, we can. Peter, go ahead.
>> Excellent. Uh, thank you. Thank you to
the FIFA accessibility team for
providing a presentation on
accessibility. Um, thank you for
reflecting and ensuring that uh people
are inclusive. Um, I work for Spinal
Cord Injury Ontario as the director of
public policy and I can tell you that
there are many people from across the
country and around the world that are
that have disabilities and are
interested in uh participating in this
tournament. Um, and we are interested in
where people can access information. Um
you can imagine people will be coming
from airports to hotels, from hotels to
venues to fan festivals and and and of
the like. Um there's a concern about how
people are going to be accessing
transportation when they're not
residents. You mentioned in your
presentation uh many examples of wheel
trans and pickup and drop offs, but I
haven't heard any partnerships or
integration with uh ride sharing
companies or taxi brokerages. um how are
our visitors across our global stage
going to be able to get around um during
the busiest time of of this global event
and what contingencies and readinesses
have been put in place to ensure that
people with disabilities are fully
included in the tournament.
Hopefully we can get some of those
questions answered uh throughout the
question period. Um but those are those
are the top of mind things um when
thinking about FIFA how people with
disabilities will be fully included.
>> Thank you Peter. Is that the end of your
deputation?
>> Yes.
>> Great. Thank you very much. Uh does
anyone have any questions for Peter?
>> No.
Okay. Seeing none. Thank you very much.
Uh, next we have Christine Hubard, Beck
Paxi.
>> Hi, Christine.
>> Hi.
>> Morning. Uh, you have five minutes. Go
ahead.
>> Thank you. I just I'm just here to
>> Sorry, you need to turn your mic on. Oh,
I've never had to do that before. There
you go. Okay. Um I'm just here to um
just say a few words. I think um we do
have a real challenge. I'm obviously
again with Beck Taxi, uh we have been
providing or have been able to provide
ondemand wheelchair accessible service
in the city since 2015 when um the plan
for accessibility here was created. Um,
you know, we saw red flags early on and
the alarms were uh sounded at that time.
In 2019, the city started to collect
funds to support the drivers who are
offering the service to ensure the
viability of this service to continue.
Um, we've seen now that relatively
speaking, all of the vehicles have
disappeared. Um,
the city now has $20 million of industry
money. That is money collected from the
accessibility fund uh for all ride trips
and for all licensing renewals in the
taxi industry. And again, this was
supposed to be a collaborative effort to
ensure again that we would be able to
provide ondemand wheelchair accessible
service um for the disabled community.
Um and now as we approach FIFA,
those vehicles are gone. the money is in
the bank account and people and not only
just FIFA and this isn't hyperbol or
hyperbole pardon me um that people are
stuck at home and you know as important
as FIFA is and such a wonderful amazing
very exciting time for our city we are
seeing that um people are just unable to
get around period and with the money
that is in the hands of the city um as
we approach FIFA as we consider things
like the AODDA. Um I just would like to
acknowledge that Becktaxi that I am, you
know, willing and ready to participate
in whatever can be done to rectify this
situation. Um I think that there has
been some negligence. I think that there
has been some lack of consultation,
complete lack of communication, and this
is to the detriment of the people again
who were providing the service and of
course for those who who now cannot
access it. Um, and I just think it's
something that needs to be, you know,
put on the record that as we approach
FIFA, the ondemand wheelchair accessible
ground transportation service in the
city is all but gone.
Thank you.
>> Thank you, Christine. Uh, does anyone
have any questions for Christine?
Uh, Nav'i, I think I see your hand up.
Go ahead.
>> So, Christine, I'm wondering, and I
don't know if you would have this, but
I'm wondering if we could uh if you
could provide some more context or
numbers related to this. you said that
um like how many like going into FIFA
World Cup there's been um a decrease in
the number of accessible vehicles that
Beck has as compared to 2019. I I think
I'm sorry I hope I understand that
correctly. But could we could you
provide some context for that so we have
more information about it?
>> I'm so glad you asked. Thank you. Um
actually I have all the numbers in my
head and they can be checked against
what I'm about to say. In 2015, there
were 594 wheelchair accessible licenses
issued in the city. Each one of those
licenses had uh wheelchair accessible
vehicle that was purchased by a taxi
driver. Um, and they were supposed to
join any existing brokerage like Beck
because of course, um, people need to be
able to plan their days, uh, the people
who are accessing the service. Um, so
there had to be a phone number or an app
or or some sort of way for people to get
in touch. So in partnership with the
city, you know, we were very very
excited to see this happen. Beck Taxi um
invested about a million dollars to
attract the vehicles to our brokerage
and to ensure that the service was being
promoted to potential riders. And we at
that time, as of 2016, were able to
offer equitable ondemand wheelchair
accessible service. We saw that by 2019
um no plans for the continuation of the
service really had been discussed and
these vehicles were already starting to
age out. They were about 5 years old at
that time and we started to you know
have conversations with the city with
our regulator about how are we going to
ensure that these drivers are making
enough money to be able to replace the
vehicles as they start to age out. um
the city started to collect money and I
know this is probably more information
than you are looking for but I think it
does help um bring us to the numbers
that I'm about to share with you um they
collected the money from the rest of the
industry so all taxi drivers who are
driving standard vehicles um companies
like ours and of course from every ride
hail uh trip the money was being
collected and
from that point there was a plan to
distribute some of it annually to these
drivers. it was clear that that the math
didn't work that it wasn't going to be
enough. And basically what we've seen
that by 2024
when I sat I think in this chair um
concerned about what we were seeing that
number had dwindled to
100 in Beck. So relatively speaking the
the entire fleet had been reduced by
half. And the warning there was that the
same vehicles that were on the road in
2015 that we started having concerns
about the safety of in 2019 are still
the vehicles by and large that are on
the road today. But I will tell you that
at Mech Taxi we have 30 vehicles. Four
of which are viable. The rest are 10
years old and are falling down daily.
And I'm not familiar with any other
company or resource where people can
call to get licensed ondemand wheelchair
accessible service. Uber andyft were
supposed to offer that. They've been
able to, you know, work without it with
impunity. Every fleet with over 500
vehicles is supposed to offer ondemand
wheelchair accessible service. They've
never been required to do it. None have
been challenged. And now we find that as
the only company that I'm familiar with
that truly was able to do it, there are
none. And it's it's something that um
is terrifying actually to consider. I
you know, a lot of things have happened
over the years in our industry that have
been sort of gobsmacking, but this is
one that's left me truly stunned.
So again, I guess the number is
relatively speaking, there are zero
Nav'i, do you have any other follow-up
questions?
>> Thank you for that context of your
deputation. Yep. No.
>> Okay. Thank you. Does anybody else from
the committee have any other questions
for Christine?
>> No. Okay. I just have a few quick
questions. So Christine, you said um in
your fleet as of 2024, there are four
viable licensed accessible taxis on the
road currently.
>> Uh as of 2026, yes. So 2024 we had 98.
2026 and when I say viable, I mean four
that have been replaced. The the balance
of those 26 are 10 years old now and are
falling down daily. And I I think that
when people hear the number 30, the
expectation is that those 30 vehicles
are on the road 24 hours a day. Of
course, they're not. This is the um most
labor intensive work a lot of these
drivers have done. And I think when the
licenses were given out, the average age
of the drivers was about 55. Now they're
in their 60s. Um so again, the vehicles
are 10 years old, way too old than they
should have ever have been allowed to
stay um on the road. And so I would say
at any given time, we might have a few.
>> Okay. And that's why I say viable.
>> And do you know, and I don't expect you
to know this, but do you know what the
other uh taxi companies might have in
their viable accessible fleet?
>> No, because uh I mean, I guess what the
best way to tell is through the city's
own um website. What we can see is that
uh I think there were to my
understanding based on MLS's um feedback
180 vehicles were eligible for the 2024
um
funds for accessibility and and that
might even be 2025. But the the the
plain fact is that I think probably 120
of those have expired as of March 31st.
Um, and then the rest have just
organically or inorganically fallen
down. So, if I was going to say in the
entire city, my guess would be 50, 40.
Um, it's hard to say. I'm not familiar
with any other company that is licensed.
So, I know there are private companies
offering wheelchair accessible service,
but they can make up their own rates and
charge someone $50 to go around the
block, which is terrifying as well.
>> Okay. So you say your estimate is
between 50 to 40 uh accessible taxis for
that are available for on demand service
in
>> Yeah. And I don't even know if they're
available. They may or may not be
connected with brokerages in the city. I
know that when the program was created
uh there was also the ability for three
or four drivers to get together and
create a brokerage of their own uh
without actually having any sort of way
to market how to contact them and ended
up operating as standard cabs. So that
would be something I think for municipal
licensing and standard staff to answer.
>> Okay. Thank you very much.
>> Thank you.
>> Uh seeing no further questions. Okay.
Thank you. Uh next we have Louise
Hidinger. Uh Clean Indoor Air Toronto.
Louise, are you there?
>> I am here. Can you hear me?
>> Uh can you speak up a bit louder,
please?
>> Uh is this better?
>> Yeah, that's much better. Uh thank you
for joining us. Go ahead. You have five
minutes.
>> All right. Thank you. Um, I am a science
communicator and lead for science
communication for Clean Indoor Air
Toronto. As a local grassroots advocacy
group dedicated to pro promoting the
health and well-being of Toronto
residents and visitors, Clean Indoor Air
Toronto was eager to review the FIFA
World Cup 2026 accessibility update
presentation. We thank this committee
for creating an opportunity for us to
review the plan, which we understand has
been prepared by the FIFA World Cup 2026
Secretariat.
While we're all affected by the quality
of the air we breathe, some members of
our society are more impacted by poor
air quality than others. This group
includes ch children, seniors, the
imunompromised
people with chronic health conditions,
and people with disabilities. We were
hopeful that the city of Toronto, with
its growing understanding around the
importance of air quality, would
incorporate into the FIFA World Cup 2026
accessibility plan meaningful actions
that would result in participants having
at a minimum improved access to air that
we know is clean and safe to breathe.
This approach would have resulted in
this worldclass event being more
inclusive and accessible for thousands
of Torononians and safer and healthier
for all. Unfortunately, based on the
presentation associated with this item,
it appears that air quality has not been
factored in as an accessibility issue.
This is unfortunate given the situation
ahead for Toronto. The World Cup will
see thousands of visitors from around
the globe visiting our city. And while
they will bring with them energy,
enthusiasm, and hopefully plenty of
spending dollars, they may also bring
with them contagious diseases that can
be readily transmitted through the air.
We're hardly alone in our concern around
this topic. Toronto Public Health has
also noted that the crowds attracted by
World Cup events have the potential to
spread infectious airborne diseases.
With climate change, the incidence of
extreme heat and wildfires has increased
along with their severity. By June,
there will be a significant risk of hot
weather and wildfires. As a result,
outdoor air quality can be incredibly
poor. And that means outside activities,
while generally considered safer than
indoor ones when it comes to air quality
concerns, may no longer be accessible
during heat and poor air quality
advisories. Together, these factors
create a World Cup event that cannot be
safely and comfortably accessed by those
conscious of these elevated risks,
including some healthy people who are
simply cautious when it comes to the air
they breathe. To remedy this, we
encourage the FIFA World Cup 2026
Secretariat to revise its plan for
accessibility and incorporate actions
related to both outdoor and indoor air
quality. This would include implementing
IEQ protective measures such as using
air filtration and mechanical
ventilation best practices, creating
contingency plans for outdoor city
sponsored events in case of a poor air
quality advisory. It would also include
track tracking and publicly sharing
existing outdoor air quality
measurements as well as monitoring and
sharing indoor air quality measurements
for key locations.
An essential aspect of this updated plan
would be clear, consistent information
for eventgoers, including steps they can
take to protect themselves from air
pollution and airborne diseases. There
should also be training for event staff
on how they can quickly improve indoor
air quality with readily accessible
tools and how they can protect
themselves from airborne hazards. We
recognize that we're mere weeks away
from the World Cup. However, we strongly
believe that the efforts a revision to
this accessibility plan would require
would pay off in healthier, more engaged
attendees who require less medical
attention and are better able to support
both the celebrations and local
businesses. Again, thank you to this
committee for creating this opportunity
to allow us to express our concerns
around this topic. Thanks.
>> Thank you, Louise. Uh, does anybody have
any questions for Louise?
>> No. Okay. Thank you very much.
Uh, next we have Nicole Curado.
Nicole, uh, would you like to go ahead?
You have five minutes.
Okay. Is this this
>> this is the FIFA item?
>> Oh, yes. Um, I would like to say thank
you for for considering uh neuro
affirming accessibility and sensory
accessibility in this item. That's what
I was going to say. I was going to ask
if that was uh considered because it
wasn't listed in the in the
list, but thank you for for addressing
that. I you answered my question and I
thank you for including everybody in the
FIFA World Cup to make cup to make it a
to make it uh accessible and enjoyable
for all.
>> Thank you.
Uh, does anybody have any questions for
Nicole?
Seeing none, thank you very much,
Nicole.
Um,
members, do you have any questions for
staff
on this item? I see Nav'i and then uh
Kate. Hard
>> and then Howard. Okay, so Nav'i, Kate,
Howard. So, first uh let's go with
Nav'i. Go ahead.
>> Hi. Hi. Thanks so much, Sharon and
Michael. I'm hoping you could give me a
little bit more information because I'm
so excited about this idea of creating
an accessibility playbook for the city.
When I think about accessible washrooms,
while the standard can be great for big
events like this, in my work in
accessibility, I see things like Hoyer
lifts, having a Hoyer lift available in
one of these. Um, and so a Hoyer lift
would support someone who had a little
bit more access needs and I'm wondering
if that's being consider and I'm
thinking about projecting about having
people visiting the city and what that
would look like in the future. Is that
something that's considered about
accessibility like various need beyond
that? Is there is there varying access
availabilities at the washrooms that are
coming up at the FIFA World Cup
>> through the chair? Thanks for the
question. Uh I don't think specifically
what you've referenced around Hoyer
lists is part of the plans. Um but we're
certainly looking where we have to
supplement the existing washrooms with
temporary ones making sure that those uh
there is a number of accessible units
available.
I would love to see and if this is more
a commentary or an addition to your work
there maybe a little bit more work about
exp because we're thinking about a
playbook and projecting into the future
of recommendations that what a great
opportunity for the city to to make um a
best practice here on that on what
accessibility means. Yeah,
>> thank you Nav'i. Uh next we have Kate.
Yeah, thank you for the presentation.
I'm especially excited to hear about
having on-site elevator repair
technicians. I think that's a great
forwardthinking approach and allowing
people with accessibility need to enter
the stadium early. Um, my question is
around, you know, a lot of these plans
fall apart in practice when the people
on the ground don't have the training or
uh ways of identifying who qualifies for
early entry. So, I'm wondering if um
like folks when they're applying for
tickets or if it's related to their
being in the accessible parking like how
will they actually know who is eligible
for early entry uh or not? Is that going
to be dependent on uh the folks who are
um allowing entry into the stadium and
will they have the training and the
background and the knowledge to be able
to do that effectively?
Yeah. So, as as we mentioned in terms of
training, it's something that we require
of all our vendors that they have the
accessibility standards training and
it's also something that we are building
into our uh volunteer training program.
So, there will be approximately 3,000
volunteers across the stadium through
the public realm and at Fan Festival. uh
and a portion of those would work in
what um what FIFA refers to as their fan
operations team where they are
supporting some of the accessibility
measures that we noted in the
presentation. So um I think the short
answer to your question is yes there
will be training um for for staff
>> and any visible identifiers. So like on
people's tickets or if you've ever heard
of the Sunflower disability program
where people have a lanyard, will there
be a way for those volunteers and staff
to identify who has accessibility needs
without the individual having to
selfidentify?
>> I think that's something that I'd have
to take away. I I'm definitely familiar
with the Sunflower program and and we
could include that in the the training.
Um I'm not sure what other um visible
identifiers FIFA would be uh looking
for.
Okay, thank you. I appreciate you taking
that wave for consideration. I myself
have a sunflower lanyard and I think it
also just need to be made if that's
something that's going to be available
for this. It just the public needs to be
aware of visitors and everything that
that's something that they can um use to
identify without having to you know on
the spot say I have a disability and
this is what I need. Thank you.
Thank you, Kate. Uh, next we have
Howard.
Thank you for your presentation. The
question I have are shelters and uh
benches going to be provided uh for will
trans stops
throughout the grounds
uh through through the chair. Yes,
absolutely. Um there's plans throughout
the the entire last mile area to make
sure that there are uh benches and uh
things like shade structures and and
misting stations where we can provide
them.
>> Thank you.
>> That's it. Howard?
Okay, great. Thank you. Anybody else
have questions?
No. Okay, thank you. I just have a few.
Um, regarding the accessible taxis.
Um, so we heard one estimate of 50 to
40. Do staff have an estimate or can
staff verify that that number sounds
accurate?
So through you chair uh I am not sure of
the accuracy of the number but I will
give you the numbers that that we have.
Uh currently there are 524
uh total accessibil accessible taxi cabs
licensed in the city of which we are
estimating about 394 of those are under
contract to wheel trans and about 130 of
those which are available uh on demand
uh service throughout the city. uh at
any given point, how many of those are
uh actively on the road is not data that
we can collect or that we have access
to.
>> Thank you. And of the 130, how many are
back door loading versus side door
loading?
>> Uh through your chair, I think we're
looking at those numbers now. I might
not have those numbers uh exactly with
me here, but I'm uh happy to provide
them to you.
>> Okay. Um
and could you just give an update as to
what the requirements are of ride share
to provide accessible taxis for people
who need uh ride shares?
>> Uh through you chair. Uh part of the
requirement for uh ride share uh
companies to provide accessible um
service is also that they need to uh
provide that service within the same uh
reasonable amount of time that a a a
taxi would also be um able to provide
that service. a regular taxi.
>> Uh again, part of the issue that we run
into repeatedly is our access to data
from uh existing brokerages and taxi
companies. In order for us to impose uh
conditions on um private transportation
companies that required that data from
brokerages, we've had uh difficulty in
getting that data.
So are you saying there's no standard
right now for ride share, Uber, Lift to
provide accessible taxis?
>> Uh through your chair, my understanding
is that they are providing that uh
service. Uh but as far as the the time
requirement of how long that service how
long it would take for a vehicle to
arrive, uh that is dependent on um other
data that we do not have access to at
the moment. Although we have uh made
recommendations uh for things like um
digital meters which would allow us to
have more uh direct and more updated
data. Do
>> you have an estimate of how many um
accessible vehicles from Uber, Lift or
other ride share companies are on the
road?
>> Uh through you chair I do not have that
data.
>> Okay. And is that you don't have that
data or MLS does not have that data?
Uh MLS does not have that data.
>> Thank you. Um is anyone from TTC here
>> through the chair? Dean Milton, manager
of strategic initiatives at Wheel Trans.
>> Thank you very much. Uh
could you please just give an overview
of what the plan is uh to help uh people
with disabilities who might need
accessible vehicles who can't uh find
them during World Cup or any of the
other summer events we have going on
this summer in terms of the visitors to
the city?
>> Absolutely. So currently um
currently we have in place visitor uh
visitor registration
uh for wheel trans service. That's an
ongoing service that we offer. So
anybody coming from out of town uh who's
registered with a paratransit agency uh
can uh access wheel transfer up to 30
days uh without having to actually file
uh complete an application. This will be
very similar uh for the FIFA tournament.
We ha we are asking customers, this is
on the website, to register as far in
advance as they can just to cut down on
potential delays if they are going to
require wheelr service. Um so we will be
sending up temporary wheelrs numbers for
all visitors uh for the FIFA games.
>> Thank you. And how are visitors getting
this information?
>> Um, currently through the TTC website.
Um, as well as I believe uh the FIFA
official website also uh provides a link
to for accessibility and that that was
that would be where they would get that
information as well.
>> Thank you very much. And can you please
confirm
uh that the uh the visitor registry or
the visitors using wheelchairs will not
affect service for regular wheel trans
customers.
>> That is correct. Um we have a fairly
recent example with uh the Panama games
that were held a number of years ago uh
where we experienced quite a few
visitors coming in for both Pan Panam
games and the parapan games and it
didn't impact service at all.
>> Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you.
Um,
about that I'm over time. Would anyone
like to speak on this item?
Sorry.
>> Nope.
Okay. Okay. So, we we don't have any
speakers. Um
Okay. Thank you very much. And with
that, I will uh move a motion to receive
the item information. All those in
favor?
Any opposed? Motion carried. Thank you
very much.
Next, we have DI17.4, four, a review of
AC of accessible parking permit
exemptions. Members today we have
Michael Cud uh project manager
operational policy and Nazarino uh
Capano, acting director, street permits
transportation services to give a
presentation on a review of accessible
parking permit exemptions. Michael and
Naz, I will turn it over to you.
>> Thank you, chair.
Just wait a few seconds for the people
to leave.
That's
okay. Thank you, chair and esteemed TAC
members. My name is Michael Coupe,
project manager with operational policy,
data, and strategic initiatives with the
transportation division. I'm honored to
provide you all with a short
presentation regarding ongoing work that
we're doing with regards to accessible
parking, namely a review of accessible
parking exemptions.
The following slides will briefly
summarize the history of exemptions, the
request to speak here today. I will then
show work we've done so far, a review of
neighboring cities, what the current
exemptions are, and their impacts on
city programs as well as enforcement.
The presentation will conclude with an
update on the next steps.
In the mid and late 1990s,
accessible permit users reached out to
city councilors and city staff with
concerns. Having an a mobility is
typically an issue. Getting in and out
of the car, feeding the parking meter,
especially in Toronto winters, is not
ideal.
At the time, there weren't many
dedicated parking spaces or loading
zones in the city. Curb space was almost
exclusively used for parking.
Providing exemptions from paying the
meter was seen as a win-win. It would
accommodate the accessibility community
from going back and forth from the meter
to their car, as well as solve an issue
that didn't really affect a lot of
people. At the time, Toronto had 1
million dedicated passenger vehicles
registered and the province had 40,000
accessible permits issued.
The background now, well, city staff
again in permit parking in 311 as well
as counselors predominantly in the
Toronto and East York district received
complaints related to accessible
permits.
The array of complaints vary and span
both city and provincial jurisdiction.
It's important to note that the variety
of complaints stem from overuse, misuse,
and the impacts that they have on city
programs.
Additionally, transportation staff
received concerns regards to um what can
be done. So while staff are reviewing
all accessible related initiatives, we
received a directive at the February
25th infrastructure and environment
committee
requesting that staff for find equitable
solutions to the exemptions.
So before looking at the exemptions, we
had to identify what the problem was.
What is the problem? There's just a
growing number of accessible permits.
The province of Ontario currently has,
as of 2025 or the end of 2025, just over
834,000
accessible permits. The Greater Toronto
area has just over 360,000
accessible permits and the city of
Toronto has just over 141,000 accessible
permits.
So with more accessible permit holders,
new policy guidelines, standards, and a
review of exemptions are required to
meet the demand and regain the balance
on city streets.
I note the provincial and greater
Toronto areas simply because the
exemptions offered don't just apply to
city residents, they apply to all that
have a valid accessible permit.
Currently, the city of Toronto has just
over 1,200 dedicated accessible parking
spaces. These accessible spaces are
located on residential streets or
collector streets that have a
residential component.
We have over 200 dedicated accessible
loading zones. These are predominantly
on main streets.
In both cases, they are requestdriven,
either resident request driven or in the
cases of loading zones, it could be a
business or a business improvement
association.
As part of the city's ongoing
initiatives with accessibility, we are
planning proactive guidelines to
increase the number of dedicated spaces.
Reaching out to the accessibility
community,
we provided uh a survey and the results
found that in general they are
supportive of
proactively increasing the number of
dedicated spaces.
We are supportive of potentially paying
for spaces provided that more dedicated
spaces are available.
The province of Ontario being Canada's
largest province has over 444
municipalities
which approximately 50 have some sort of
accessible parking exemption.
These exemptions vary from free parking
to just grace periods or additional
levies with regards to parking times.
The key takeaway from a review of
municipalities in and around Toronto and
the uh entire province of Ontario is
that none match the volume of vehicles
and the population and the exemptions of
the city of Toronto.
So now the pest resistance is what are
the exemptions that the city of Toronto
provides?
There are four main accessible
exemptions offered to accessible permit
holders. If we look at the top left,
it's no parking. A valid accessible
permit holder is able to park in no
parking signed locations
legally.
If we look at the top right, temporal
parking, a valid accessible permit
holder can park in those temporally
timed locations such as 1 hour or 2
hours and exceed those time limits.
If we look at the bottom left, the
residential permit parking program
allows accessible permit holders to park
overnight without the need of a
residential permit.
And the bottom left, sorry, bottom
right, the Toronto Parking Authority
Greenpe on Street paid parking spaces. A
valid accessible permit holder can park
in these locations without feeding the
meter.
Let's look at the individual impacts.
Considered by many to be North America's
most comprehensive and largest
residential permit parking program, it's
gained its reputation by its ability to
provide detailed statistics and data.
The data helps with day-to-day operation
issues, but also it helps with larger
projects.
city planning, construction, bike lanes,
cafe TTO, water mane and electrical work
all consult the residential parking
program to see what kind of impact their
project may have and quite frankly
accommodations that need to be made.
For example, with a growing number of
accessible permits
uh used in the city, we have inaccurate
data.
Complaints from counselor's offices as
well as the public are consistent. The
question is what can be done to ensure
that the residential inventory counts
are accurate.
When we look at the Toronto Parking
Authority Green P on street parking
spaces, it's a similar story. Their
inventory numbers are skewed by
accessible permits parking on the
street. Through one of their innovation
studies, the TPA installed sensors at
various on street parking locations in
the downtown core. In a span of 5
months, 48,000 vehicles were observed
parking in these locations.
Of the studied locations, it was
reported that up to 12% of the spaces
were being occupied by accessible
permits. That's just under 6,000
vehicles.
A less scientific study is simply to
walk down Elizabeth Street between city
hall and Dundas. It's not uncommon to
see approximately 50 plus% of the
vehicle spaces being used by accessible
permits. Now the question is does this
mean we need to provide greater
dedicated accessible parking spaces or
is this a case of mis misuse or abuse of
permits as we've heard from both the
accessibility community and counselor's
offices.
When we look at no parking zones, two
items come to mind. Bottlenecks on
narrow streets, especially in the
downtown core. Corner setbacks are major
issues. An accessible permit in the
picture on the left here is parked right
next to an intersection.
This impedes both pedestrian safety or
vehicles trying to turn. On a
residential street, if parking is
affixed to one side and an accessible
permit holder is parked on the opposite
side, it creates a bottleneck and could
impact on emergency vehicles.
Not to mention in the wintertime.
And lastly, temporal parking.
You may notice 1 hour or twohour parking
restrictions across the street across
the city, predominantly on streets off
of main routes. So, let's say Blure
Street.
The spirit of these temporal
restrictions is to deter non-residents
from parking too long and to kind of
protect those residents that have
residential permits.
Unfortunately, it's also too common for
our neighbors from the far west of
Missaga, far east of, let's say,
Pickering or north in Vaughn using these
spaces with their accessible permits and
then parking near let's say their work
or place of entertainment.
Unfortunately, with the accessibility
community,
mobility is an issue and these
restrictions or the exemptions of the
restrictions are needed because
obviously they might be slower to get to
their destination.
And lastly, enforcement.
Toronto Police Services parking
enforcement are supportive of our review
and potential reviews and changes to
exemptions.
Equitable treatment of all parked
vehicles provides greater consistency
which improves enforcement especially
with future initiatives such as ALPR
technology.
The automation of enforcement which will
happen at some point in the future
relies on reading license plates to
determine whether a vehicle is parked
legally. Accessible permits are placards
that go onto the dashboard of a vehicle
and aren't affiliated with a license
plate. So, it's something that we need
to review.
When it comes to enforcement of abuse or
misuse, the Toronto Police Parking
Enforcement has uh quite a bit of of
information with that. And in 2025,
over 8,000 related offenses were issued.
There was a bunch of confiscations and
cautions.
So, what are the next steps?
Transportation staff are uh prepared to
submit a report to the June 10th
infrastructure and environment committee
with recommendations going forward.
We're going to continue re-examining the
existing accessible parking exemptions.
We're going to continue with the
proactive approach of increasing the
number of dedicated accessible parking
spaces and creating a dedicated
dedicated accessible parking space
guideline. We also want to improve
communication on dedicated accessible
parking locations
uh potentially through an app or a city
website and engage with the
accessibility community.
And that concludes my presentation.
Thank you, Michael. Uh does anybody have
any questions for Michael?
>> I see Kate and then I see Nav'i. So
Kate, go ahead.
>> Um thank you for that presentation. I
just had a question about those 8,000
cases of misuse in 2025, I think you
said it was. Um, were those all
validated cases of misuse where, you
know, the person using the parking spot
was definitely determined to not be the
holder of the permit or were they just
self-reported where, you know, sometimes
people see an ambulatory wheelchair user
not, you know, and make assumptions
about that person not being a valid
permit holder. So, just curious if those
8,000 were all like validated
infractions.
>> Thank you. Uh, through the chair. Thank
you so much for asking that, Kate.
That's um a fantastic question. So 8,000
was the reported number of complaints
that the Toronto Police Parking
Enforcement had to investigate. Um that
doesn't necessarily mean that they found
misuse or abuse, but it was something
that they had to investigate.
That speaks to a larger issue. I know
this isn't what you're asking, but kind
of add to it. That speaks to a larger
issue when it comes to accessible
permits. Um while there are so many need
uh required individuals that require
these permits, there are cases of
questionable usage and a lot of the
complaints stem from the uh eligibility
uh criteria from the province and the
renewal process at the province. So, a
lot of the complaints that the Toronto
Police Parking Enforcement have received
is where perhaps an elderly person
passes away and their family member
continues using their permit.
Um, so it's it's an ongoing issue and
it's something that's obviously very
sensitive and we have to treat with
caution.
>> Yeah, thank you for that. So, it sounds
like 8,000 is not the absolute number of
validated
um infractions.
>> Correct.
>> Correct.
Okay, thank you.
>> Thank you, Kate. Uh, next we have Nav'i.
>> Hi, Michael. Thank you so much. I'm just
taking a note. Um,
I think I I wanted a little if a moment
for you to elucidate for me because I
I'm I think in my mind I'm conflating
the issue of misuse of uh of these
permits and then the issue of changing
changes to eligibility.
How is the city negotiating
changing changes to eligibility without
removing people who were previously
considered eligible?
How is that being negotiated with the
issue of misuse, eligibility and misuse?
I see those as two separate
considerations and and and yeah, I'm
hoping to get a little bit more
information there because of course my
concern is who is considered eligible
today won't be tomorrow for fear of
misuse. What are those
>> uh what are the credentials of like what
are the what are the areas of disability
that's considered eligible today that
tomorrow we're thinking yeah I think
I've said that enough. Thanks.
>> Yeah. No, completely appreciate the
complexity. Um, it's it's something that
we're obviously struggling with as well,
but it's the feedback that we're
receiving um from everyone from the
accessibility community, but then also
from the general public when it comes to
the fact that there's just a lot more
accessible permits in the city and in
around the city. We can't help but look
at the eligibility and the impact that
the province has on accessible permits.
So, for example, while there are
individuals that absolutely
require um a permanent accessible
permit, there are individuals that
receive temporary accessible permits
because they they had some kind of
procedure and will be temporarily um
impacted mobility-wise.
What we found is that a lot of
individuals are somehow extending those
um and then receiving a permanent
permit. So, it's more so just a review
of
um right now the renewal process with
the province is essentially just
confirming that your address is still
your address and that you're still with
us. We want to review that to ensure
that anyone that maybe just should have
had a temporary one isn't continually uh
using the the perks of an accessible
permit.
>> Okay, that's much clearer for me. Thank
you. And and just confirming there that
then the eligibility itself in terms of
functional limitation and medical
consideration is not being is not being
reviewed in the issues of changes to
eligibility.
>> Exactly. Exactly.
>> Okay. Yeah.
>> Yeah. We're still respecting that
there's there's causes for uh criteria
for eligibility. It's more so kind of
differentiating between um you know the
temporary one and the permanent one and
and then the renewal process cuz in some
cases I'll give you I'll give you a
personal example. Um I had multiple knee
surgeries and was it was suggested that
I get an accessible permit. Uh I refused
but it was in my purview to get one. I
could have had one for multiple years.
Um, thankfully I'm able-bodied now.
>> Thank you. Uh, are there any other
questions on this item?
No. See, no. Seeing none. Thank you very
much, Michael.
>> Thank you.
Um, are there any speakers on this item?
>> No.
Uh hearing no further speakers, I will
move the motion to receive the item for
information. All those in favor?
Opposed? Motion carried. Thank you. And
now we are on to our final item, DI17.5,
Breaking Barriers, Housing Access for
Women with Disabilities, Centering Lived
Experiences in Toronto's affordable
housing system. members. Today we have
Michelle Pang, Toronto Women in Action
Housing Advocacy Coordinator, Nelly's to
give a presentation on breaking
barriers, housing access for women with
disabilities, centering lived
experiences in Toronto's affordable
housing system. Michelle, I will turn it
over to you. Thank you for joining us.
Good morning members of the committee
and thank you for the opportunity to
present today. My name is Cen Pan
Michelle Toronto women in action housing
advocacy coordinator from NIS and I'm
joined by my colleagues Antonia.
Today we will be sharing key findings
and recommendations from Ner's position
paper breaking barriers centering the
voices of women and gender diverse
people in assessing the affordable
housing system. We had the opportunity
to present the border findings of this
position paper to the housing rights
advisory committee in April and for
today's presentation we will be focused
on more specifically on the experiences
of women with disabilities and take a
deeper look at the accessibility related
barriers they face when trying to assess
safe affordable housing in Toronto. Our
goal is to highlight these key barriers
and to identify areas where municipal
action can help improve accessibility,
equity, and accountability within the
housing system.
So, we all know that Toronto is
currently facing a deepening housing
crisis where access to safe and
affordable housing is becoming more
difficult. We are seeing raising rents
across the city with many rentists
spending more than 30% of the income of
housing and at the same time there are
over a 100,000 households who are
waiting for LGI units with weight times
can be stretched beyond 15 years. There
is also a significant shortage of
supportive and transitional housing
which is critical for people who need
additional supports including people
with disabilities.
On top of this, risks like eviction,
displacement, and limited access to
legal supports are further pushing
people into unstable housing situations.
For women and gender diverse people with
disabilities, these challenges can be
even more compressed as they are
navigating both affordability barriers
and a lack of accessibility and
appropriate housing options.
Last year we conducted several trauma
informed focus groups with participants
who have life experience of housing
instability along with frontal line
staff and also legal and set research.
For today's presentation, we draw
specifically from insights shared
through Nar's women on the move program.
This program is designed to address
service gaps for women with physical
disabilities who have experienced abuse
and provides a safe place for them to
share their experiences, challenges and
recommendations.
These insights are also supported by
border research and statistic to help
contextualize and strengthen our
findings.
Women with disabilities are not just
facing housing barriers. They are
navigating systems that were never
designed for them. One woman who spoke
to us said that she lives in a so-called
accessible affordable housing. She uses
a power wheelchair. However, the
doorways in her unit are too narrow and
shared spaces in the buildings are often
being locked. When she raises those
maintenance issues like a toilet cannot
be functioned properly, the
superintendent are ignored and
redirected her to the personal support
worker, which we all know that that's
not their role. Over time, she stopped
asking for help, not because the issues
were soft, but because she was afraid of
retaliation.
and she shared with us, "It feels like
that he just doesn't care about me
because I'm disabled and I have no
power."
Another woman also told us about being
tied to a mandated PSUP agency through
her affordable housing. Even when she
experienced poor treatment, she had no
option to change providers. She felt
disrespected and associated in her own
home. She described it simply. I feel
invisible in my own home. We also heard
from a woman with a visual disability
trying to apply for LGI housing. The
online system didn't work with her
screen readers at that moment and staff
couldn't assist her in the community
center. Years later, she still have no
idea whether she stands on the weight
list or not. And when living in the
private market, she felt she had to hide
her disability just to consider for for
a unit. She told us that I worry that I
will be homeless before I ever get an
RGI unit.
What we heard from participants is not
just a series of individual experiences.
It refresh a broader patterns of
systemic exclusion. For example, when
housing is labeled as accessible, up to
40% of units still remain inaccessible
in practice. And at the same time, many
online housing systems are not fully
compatible with assessive technologies,
creating additionals barriers just to
apply. These gaps have real consequence.
Women and gender diverse people with
disabilities are significantly more
likely to struggle to find suitable
housing and many experiences hidden
homelessness. They are living in unsafe
or unstable situations that are often
not captured in the official data.
Besides for people with disabilities,
there is currently no no formal priority
pathway within the LGI housing. This
means that even when their housing needs
are really urgent, they are placed in
the same system as everyone else often
facing weight list that can stretch for
decades. And during that time, many of
them are forced to remain in unsafe,
inaccessible or unaffordable housing. At
the same time, the shelter system is not
fully accessible either. While some
shelters may have basic wheelchair
assets, many of them still lack of
comprehensive accessibility and very few
provide supports such as braille
materials or other inclusive features.
As a result, for many women with
disabilities, the system does not
provide a clear or safe pathway forward.
It reinforces exclusion rather than
addressing it. As one focus group
participant mentioned, this not just
hot, it's degrading.
Based on these findings, our
recommendations focus on moving beyond
surface level accessibility towards
meaningful and system level change.
First, we recommend strengthening
accountability and tenants protection.
Many participants shared experiences
where maintenance issues were being
ignored or where they felt unsafe
raising those concerns. This highlights
the need for clear accountability for
housing providers, superintendent and
PSD agencies along with transparent
complaint process that can protect
tenants and ensure real consequences for
neglect or discrimination.
Second, we need to rethink how housing
and service are designed. This includes
expanding the supply of physically
accessible and affordable housing, but
also ensuring accessibility standards
are consistently applied across
shelters, transitional housing, and
community spaces. Importantly, staff
must be trained in disability informed
and anti-abless practices so that
services are not just only accessible in
design but also in how they are being
delivered.
Third, we need to make housing system
truly accessible and creates clear
pathways into housing. This includes
ensuring application platforms are
compatible with assessive
assisted assistive technologies
available in multiple languages and
support by inperson assistance. There is
also an urgent need to establish a
formal disability priority pathway
within LGI housing so women with
disabilities are not just waiting for
years without a clear path forward.
Finally, we recommend investing in
community empowerment. Participants
highlighted the importance of peer
support and in navigating the system.
Funding rights based peer lead programs
can help women with disabilities better
understand their rights, access
resources, and advocate for themselves.
To conclude, women and gender diverse
people with disabilities face not only a
lack of affordable housing, that's also
a lack of housing that is truly
accessible, safe, and dignified. These
barriers are interconnected from
inaccessible buildings and systems to
long way and limited accountability in
housing services. Also, accessibility is
not an option. It is essential to
safety, independence, and housing
stability.
Moving forward, municipal action is
critical in strengthening accessibility
standards, improving accountability, and
creating clear pathway into housing.
Accessibility must be treated not as an
add-on, but as a core part of housing
equity and a human rights to housing.
And finally, if you are interested in
learning more, we have include a link to
the full position paper here. Thank you
so much for your time and attention.
Thank you, Michelle. Uh, does anybody
have any questions for Michelle?
>> No. Okay. Thank you very much, Michelle,
for presenting at the committee today.
>> Thank you.
Would
anyone Oh, sorry. We have a speaker on
the item. Uh Nicole Curado. Nicole, are
you there?
Um, I would like to say that one of the
things you need to bear in mind is that
a lot of women who
are
going to be living at what one of the
things that hasn't been looked at is
neuroaccessibility and sensory
friendliness in these homes. Um, as an
autistic woman, I recognize that I need
to have a quiet place. I need to have
somewhere that that isn't being
bombarded with outside noise, isn't
having a lot of people talking at once.
So, a lot of the women's shelters would
not be suitable and autistic women
because of the, you know, the high
masking and because of that,
social skill challenges are sometimes
going to be more likely to be taken
advantage of by men. So, oh, obviously,
uh, autistic women can have very healthy
relationships, but
you know, what I need for a home is I
need to have a quiet environment, an
environment that,
you know, where I I can have basically a
safe sanctuary. I I want somewhere that
that has, you know, good sound
management and is also going to be
respecting my need for for quiet and my
need for an environment that
where I can have my own space
and where I can get away from sensory
overload.
So that's that's something to to bear in
mind. But also another thing is if it's
an apartment, you want to be feeling
safe in the elevators. You know, it
might not I might not feel safe if I'm
the only person in the elevator with a
man. You know, there's these are things
to think about. having not having, you
know, dark corridors where you have to
walk into, you know, having the areas be
well lit outside, having, you know, not
having long hallways where where Ben
could, you know, abuse you or or laundry
that, you know, might be, you know,
alone with with somebody. You want
everywhere to be th those areas that the
hallways and the elevators to be
communal areas.
So you want them to,
you know, woman to feel like, you know,
I would I would want any woman would
want something where she feels safe,
where she's not going to feel like she's
alone with a man. you know that that
that's the kind of thing you know it's
all things to think about
and especially for women who are like
myself who are neurode divergent and
often ADHD as well and we'll sometimes
be talking to people and you know so
that those are all things to to consider
neuroccessibility and
sensory friendliness but also
safety especially for for neurode
divergent women like myself who are
distractable and autistic and and very
small.
>> Thank you, Nicole. Uh, does anybody have
any questions for Nicole?
No. Seeing none. Thank you very much.
Um, would anyone like to speak on this
item?
No. Okay. I will just say very very
insightful presentation and thank you
for coming to present to TAC. We
appreciated having you.
Um
and
so hearing no further speakers, I will
move the motion to receive the item for
information. All those in favor?
Any opposed? That is carried. Uh before
we end the meeting today, I will move a
motion to excuse the absentees of TAC
members who were not able to attend
today's meeting. Thank you. I'll ask the
clerk to display the motion and I will
read it aloud.
that the Toronto Accessibility Advisory
Committee excuse the absence of Anika
Abdullah, Richard Francis, Dana Francis,
Miranda Frey, Liv Mendelson, and Hannah
Clark Andrews from the May 4th, 2026
Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee
meeting. All those in favor?
Opposed? That's carried. Uh, that
concludes our business. Uh, thank you
very much, members and staff. Our next
meeting, our meeting is now adjourned.
Our next meeting is on June 15th, 2026.
Thank you and have a good rest of your
day.