Confronting Anti-Black Racism Advisory Committee - November 25, 2025

City Council Meeting Summary

The meeting covered updates on bylaw enforcement and accessibility, equity-focused policy initiatives, senior strategy development, and budget allocations for social development plans, with several motions on agenda management, new committee appointments, and public data transparency. Key decisions included approving new anti-racism committee appointments, approving items to the agenda, and advancing discussions on public dashboards, equity impact frameworks, and budget allocations, while several bylaw-related items remain under discussion or deferred.

Five Most Important Topics Discussed

1) Access to Social Infrastructure Bylaw Implementation Update (CR 8.1) - The update focused on enforcement capacity, resources, and scope. It was noted that the Transportation Services Division leads enforcement with 62 TSOs, including four assigned to the access area bylaw, and that capacity has been sufficient to date. Quote: “Capacity has been sufficient for managing the intake current.” - The bylaw applies only to established access areas, with enforcement limited to those zones, not broader demonstrations. Quote: “The bylaw only applies to established access areas. So any enforcement that you may see in the broader context of demonstrations may happen outside of this bylaw.” - File noted: CR 8.1. Public input channels include ongoing community engagement and feedback through the city’s processes.

2) Interaction with Bill 33 and School Contexts (SROs and Education) - Discussion centered on how the bylaw interacts with provincial Bills (notably Bill 33) and the potential expansion of police authority in schools and community spaces. The concern was about safeguards for civil liberties and the impact on marginalized groups. Quote: “Taken together, these developments represent a widening of police authority in public spaces, including those used disproportionately by Black residents.” - Clarifying point: the bylaw does not apply to post-secondary institutions; individual schools would need to request an access area. Quote: “The bylaw does not apply to post-secondary institutions... individual schools would need to request an access area first.” - File noted: No city file number for Bill 33 itself; discussion centers on its interaction with local bylaw. Public interest questions about safeguards remain.

3) Public Data Transparency and Equity Data Collection - The discussion highlighted transparency needs and concerns about publishing raw enforcement data. The city noted it does not currently post service requests publicly and is cautious about privacy and interpretation risks. Quote: “We don’t currently post service requests because most of them are general in nature.” - Debates included the potential for disaggregated race-based data collection, with privacy concerns acknowledged. Quote: “We need to understand what is the nature of the data and how it would be interpreted... to avoid unintentionally harming those populations.” - A public transparency proposal from the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Advisory Committee (CABRAC) recommended monthly updates, including a map and searchable register of all access areas. Quote: “The Confronting Anti-Black Racism Advisory Committee recommends that the city manager... provide updates monthly that include a map and searchable register of all access areas.” - File noted: CR 8.1 (dashboard/visibility context) and related bylaw data discussions.

4) 2026 Budget Allocation for Social Development Plan Implementation (CR 8.4) - The council added the item to the agenda, signaling a focus on budget planning for the social development plan’s implementation, with emphasis on equity-deserving communities. Quote: “This is the 2026 budget allocation for social development plan implementation.” - Context included the ongoing bylaw and seniors-related initiatives; the discussion connected SDP funding to housing, safety, and community supports. - File noted: CR 8.4.

5) Toronto Seniors Strategy 3.0 and Public Engagement - The development of Toronto Seniors Strategy 3.0 was presented as a comprehensive, equity-focused effort with concrete engagement: a three-phase process, 5,400+ seniors involved, and six identified priorities (aging in place, mobility, safety, social connection, affordability, navigation). Quote: “We started this in the spring of 2025... It was a multi-modal process which included a survey, community workshops, and focus groups.” - The strategy emphasizes aging in place, equity for Black and equity-deserving seniors, and ongoing opportunities for public input as the plan evolves. Quote: “If this what we’ve heard and the priorities that we’ve identified resonate with what you hear in the communities... we would love to hear about that as well.” - File noted: While not a single file-numbered item, there are related discussions around SDP leadership and senior-focused governance (e.g., mentions of the Toronto Seniors Strategy Accountability Table).

File Numbers / Bylaws Mentioned

• CR 8.1: Access to Social Infrastructure Bylaw Implementation Update
• CR 8.3: Confronting Anti-Black Racism Advisory Committee appointments (and related motions)
• CR 8.4: 2026 Budget Allocation for Social Development Plan Implementation
• CR 8.5: Budget considerations for Social Development Plans (mentioned in context of expansion discussions)

Opportunities for Public Input

• Public can participate via:
  • Live/in-person and YouTube-streamed meetings.
  • Donations for Hurricane Melissa relief at select Toronto fire stations (public participation in relief efforts).
  • CABRAC and senior-strategy processes typically invite ongoing input through advisory committees, community organizations, and public consultations.
  • Public input channels referenced include email to monitor motions (Gina) and the “CABRA” process (CABRAC/CABRA email) for submitting motions and following items.
  • For seniors’ strategy, there were extensive engagement opportunities: online survey (over 5,100 online responses with about 300 via other methods), pop-up events, and focus groups co-designed with community organizations.

Motions — Passed, Rejected, or Deferred (titles and outcomes)

• Approval/Adoption Motions
  • Approval of Minutes from September 3, 2025 — Passed unanimously.
  • Addition of New Items to the Agenda (CR 8.3) — Passed (including New Appointment to the CA Black Racism Advisory Committee; Meeting Processes and Simplified Rules of Procedure; 2026 SDP Budget CR 8.4).
  • Reordering of Agenda — Passed.
  • Motion to Receive New Members to the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Advisory Committee (CR 8.3) — Passed unanimously.
  • Motion to Excuse Absences (Himo, Kathy, and Rosemary) — Passed unanimously.
  • Motion to Adopt the Letter from May (CR8.x) — Pending final wording; discussed and deferred for clerks’ review depending on amendments.
  • Motion to Enhance TSO Training (bylaw enforcement equity training) — Passed.
• Deferred / Pending / Ongoing
  • Public Dashboard for Access Areas (CR8.x) — Pending decision; to be explored by the City Manager and divisions.
  • Enforcement Protocols on City Website — Pending decision.
  • Independent Equity Impact Framework — Pending decision (to be commissioned with a Q4 2026 deadline).
  • Assessment of Bylaw Impact — Deferred; to gather data and report back.
  • Discussion on Continuation or Sunset of the Safe Access Bylaw — Deferred for future analysis.
• Rejected
  • Collection of Demographic Data (race-based) — Rejected at this stage due to privacy concerns.

Councillors Present

• Amber Moley (Councillor, Chair of the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Advisory Committee)
• Deputy Mayor Mley
• Mayor Chow
• Councillor Thompson
• Wed (council member)
• Lucina (participating member; role shown as council member in several sections, though some sections present as advisory committee context)
• Additional attendees noted across sections include various committee members (e.g., Nicholas, Makiba, Kendall Ford, Caris, Queen) and staff, but the core municipal councillors named as present in primary governance sections are: Amber Moley, Deputy Mayor Mley, Mayor Chow, Councillor Thompson, Wed.

Notes: - The transcripts include multiple sections with overlapping but not identical participant rosters. I’ve compiled present councillors from the sections that clearly identify council membership and leadership roles. - Several motions and items were discussed across sections, with some motions deferred or pending to future meetings, and others passed unanimously. The evening featured extensive discussion on equity, data transparency, and the expansion/implementation of social development initiatives. Public input opportunities were consistently highlighted, including online/virtual access, in-person engagement, and specific outreach through advisory bodies and community organizations.