City Council Meeting Summary

• The meeting focused on land-use changes, annexation decisions, and infrastructure planning, with public input opportunities around DAS discussions and zoning amendments. Several items were advanced or approved, including FLUM and zoning map amendments, and routine consent items, while some annexation discussions remained pending subject to public input and further review.

Five Most Important Topics Discussed

1) Future Land Use Map Amendment and Zoning Map Change - Topic: Updates to land designation and subsequent zoning for a substantial parcel. - Summary: The council reviewed and approved land-use designations to better align with planned development, and considered a zoning map amendment as part of the same process. - Public/Quotes: The public was invited to weigh in during the DAS discussion and the zoning map amendment process, with a final public comment session planned. Sample public sentiment included the notion that land-use changes should be carefully aligned with community impact. - File Numbers/Bylaws: Ordinance 2025 – Future Land Use Map Amendment; Ordinance 25-2025 – Zoning Map Amendment.

2) Voluntary Annexation – Flaggler Pines Property LLC - Topic: Annexation proposal and oversight considerations. - Summary: The council discussed annexing +/- 38.88 acres under Flaggler Pines LLC, recognizing concerns about infrastructure capacity and municipal services. A motion to approve the annexation was brought forward with a request to retain council oversight rather than administrative review. - Public/Quotes: A resident expressed concern about community impact and governance, and a representative noted utility concerns. Quote: “I move approval of the voluntary annexation of the property owned by Flaggler Pines LLC.” - File Numbers/Bylaws: Annexation discussions referenced in Ordinance 25-2025 (Voluntary Annexation); Section about oversight vs. administrative review referenced in the discussion.

3) Water and Sewer Capacity Measures - Topic: Capacity planning and potential funding/financing mechanisms for utilities. - Summary: The council pursued measures to ensure water and sewer capacity can support planned development, including coordination on infrastructure and potential bond or financing timelines. - Public/Quotes: Public input highlighted concerns about capacity and the need for reliable service; members discussed implementation timelines. - File Numbers/Bylaws: General references to capacity measures and related planning; no single stand-alone ordinance number specified in this section beyond the broader capacity discussions.

4) Public Input Process and Public Accountability (DAS/Zoning Debate) - Topic: How public input is integrated into planning decisions and the appropriateness of remote participation. - Summary: The meeting emphasized opportunities for public input during DAS discussions and zoning amendments, and one resident raised concerns about remote participation impacting accountability. - Public/Quotes: A resident commented on remote participation: “I have an issue with Council Member Gambaro doing most of his council meetings remotely. I would like to see him sitting in his chair.” - File Numbers/Bylaws: DAS discussion; references to public process rather than a specific code section.

5) Consent Agenda and Routine Approvals - Topic: Streamlining city operations through routine approvals. - Summary: The council approved the consent agenda unanimously, which typically includes routine items that support city operations. - Public/Quotes: No direct public quotes tied to the consent agenda in this summary; public input opportunities were provided around other items. - File Numbers/Bylaws: None specified for the consent agenda in this section.

Opportunities for Public Input

• Public input opportunities were announced and conducted during the DAS discussions and the zoning/annexation items. Residents were invited to provide input during final public comment sessions. No specific public contact emails or individuals for ongoing input were listed in this transcript excerpt; residents are typically advised to contact the City Clerk or attend upcoming public hearings for future opportunities.

File Numbers Discussed

• Ordinance 2025 – Future Land Use Map Amendment (FLUM)
• Ordinance 25-2025 – Zoning Map Amendment
• Annexation references tied to Flaggler Pines LLC (no separate file number listed beyond the annexation context)
• Chapter and section references appeared in other sections (e.g., Chapter 50, Sections 50-31 and 50-33 for waterways, Chapter 44, Section 40-34C for parking), though those were not central to the FLUM/annexation items above.

Motions Passed, Rejected, or Deferred

• Passed: DAS approval (Motion to Approve DAS) — unanimous.
• Passed: Ordinance 2025 – Future Land Use Map Amendment — unanimous.
• Passed: Ordinance 25-2025 – Zoning Map Amendment — unanimous.
• Passed: Consent Agenda — unanimous.
• Pending/Deferred/Not Finalized: Voluntary Annexation of Flaggler Pines LLC — discussion ongoing; awaiting council vote after public input.
• Pending/Not Finalized: Water and Sewer Capacity Measures — measures discussed and moving forward; no final roll-call vote documented in this excerpt.

Follow-Up Actions or Next Steps

• Implement the FLUM and zoning changes with appropriate planning and site-review steps; ensure public input is incorporated in subsequent hearings.
• Complete and monitor capacity studies for water and sewer; align with potential bond schedules and project timelines for infrastructure improvements.
• Address annexation-related concerns with continued oversight, finalize any conditions of approval, and prepare for next steps in site planning and zoning reviews.
• Maintain ongoing public engagement opportunities and ensure transparent communication around DAS and zoning amendments.

Councillors Present

• Mayor Norris
• Vice Mayor Pontieri
• Council Member Gambaro
• Council Member Miller
• Council Member Sullivan

Notes: The meeting transcript also references a city manager, city staff, and presenters (e.g., Miss Cook, Miss Chantel) involved in the process, but the five voting members listed above were the councilors present for the core actions in this summary.