Townhall Tracker

Ancaster Tower Approved Despite Opposition - Planning Committee - April 14, 2026

Hamilton · AI-assisted summary by Claude and Parth · Published

The Planning Committee held a lengthy meeting focused on several development applications and planning-process changes. The most debated item was an Official Plan Amendment to permit an eight-storey mixed-use building in Ancaster’s village core at 392–412 Wilson Street East. City staff said they received “over 150 pieces of correspondence from the public,” and multiple delegations raised concerns about height, traffic and heritage character. The committee approved the amendment 11–0.

The committee also approved a 12-lot subdivision application in Greensville at 36 Taylor Crescent (12–0) after hearing concerns about groundwater supply and septic servicing. Separately, councillors approved changes intended to speed up holding removal and formal consultation processes in response to provincial Bill 185, and passed a motion aimed at reducing “demolition by neglect” of heritage buildings.

Topics Discussed

Ancaster Village Core Development Controversy

The committee approved an Official Plan Amendment to allow an eight-storey mixed-use building at 392–412 Wilson Street East. Staff reported the file drew significant public input: “Development staff received over 150 pieces of correspondence from the public as well as additional comments included in today’s agenda.”

The applicant’s planner, Matt Johnston (Urban Solutions), described the proposal as “an eight-story mixed-use building, 118 dwelling units, 1,400 square meters of ground floor commercial,” with “263 parking spaces” and “190 bicycle parking spaces,” and said it “comes with the preservation of the MAR house.”

Delegations and councillors repeatedly returned to the question of whether the committee had meaningful discretion given provincial rules and prior tribunal decisions. Staff said the zoning in place was not the city’s decision, noting: “The application was previously submitted and a decision was made and the zoning is currently applicable law. That wasn't a city decision. That was through the OOLT process and what the province had how they had intervened.”

Several speakers also raised the broader issue of local control. One staff explanation emphasized the tribunal’s role: “The Ontario land tribunal is the decider. It is not a party that is actually negotiated with… and the tribunal has the jurisdiction to make decisions on any planning matter at the provincial level.”

The amendment passed 11–0.

Greensville Subdivision Water Supply Concerns

The committee considered a 12-lot subdivision at 36 Taylor Crescent in Greensville. Councillor Larry Wilson relayed concerns he said he heard from neighbours about groundwater impacts: “Hey, I already struggled to do laundry. My I've had to redig my well when past um developments have come in. Can you speak to uh the impacts on neighbors with respect to groundwater supply and access to groundwater?”

A speaker also described concerns raised at an open house about water availability: “The neighbors that when they spoke to us at the open house indicated that they felt that there wasn't any water to wash the car, do the laundry and some other concerns…”

City planner Daniel Barnett highlighted a limitation with tertiary systems, telling the committee: “One of problems with the tertiary system is that we cannot enforce the maintenance of it. If someone decides that they're going to let their system go… we have no kind of mechanism to enforce that they maintain that system.”

The item was approved 12–0.

Provincial Override of Local Planning Authority

Councillors and staff discussed how provincial policy and tribunal decisions shape what the city can require. Councillor Cameron Kretch argued the province’s approach leaves municipalities with limited leverage: “The province is a bully in this situation… Property rights matter more than anybody else's rights. That is clear in provincial legislation.”

Staff also described the practical reality once files reach the tribunal, noting: “once an application's at the OOLT, it's at the tribunal's discretion whether any modifications can be made without sending the matter back to the municipality.”

Development Process Streamlining

The committee approved changes to formal consultation and holding removal processes tied to Bill 185. Staff said the city “revamped the FC process to introduce the FCSP stream and the FC stream with no DRT,” explaining the changes were designed “to respond to the potential for financial penalties should the municipality miss a decision deadline.”

On timing, one comment to committee suggested the changes could shorten timelines: “I would imagine you could conceivably shave off a month or so given the fact that the circulation piece is such a big part of the zoning bylaw amendment process as it relates to holds.”

Councillors also raised the question of whether savings would benefit buyers. One speaker pressed for enforceable commitments: “If developers will come to the table with ironclad agreements that say that the monies that we're saving won't be passed on to home buyers… put it in writing.”

Heritage Building Protection Measures

The committee passed a motion aimed at reducing “demolition by neglect.” Councillor Kretch said the city’s approach has been overly deferential to owners: “We have had a culture at the city for a very long time of compliance… we work with the property owner sometimes to the detriment of the public. So this is really trying to tighten that space up and fill in the gaps that exist.”

Motions

Passed: - PED26024: Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 1042 and 1050 West 5th Street, Hamilton Ward 8 (12-0)
- PED26053: Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 36 Taylor Crescent, Flamborough Ward 13 (12-0)
- PEED-26-05: Applications for 50 and 110 Arrow Park Boulevard, Glenbrook (8-0)
- Official Plan Amendment #167 for 392-412 Wilson Street East and 15 Lauren Avenue, Ancaster Ward 12 (11-0)
- PED26053: Zoning Bylaw Amendment for 974 and 980 Upper Paradise Road, Ward 14 (8-0)
- PEED-26038: Fee and Process Review for Formal Consultation and Holding Removal Applications (8-0)
- Motion 10.1: Reducing Demolition by Neglect (8-0)

Deferred: - PED26063: Subdivision application for 36 Taylor Crescent, Greensville

Attendees

Councillors present included Councillor Casar (Ward 12), Councillor Larry Wilson, Councillor Matt Francis, Councillor Pauls, Councillor Cameron Kretch, Councillor Beeby, Councillor Wang, Councillor M. Wilson, and Councillor Nan. Staff included Daniel Barnett (Planner), Reno Davalo (Acting Director of Development Planning), Patrick McDonald (Legal Counsel), and Joseph Severino (Business Facilitator, Planning Division).

Watch the source meeting · Read transcript