City Council Meeting Summary

• The Infrastructure and Environment Committee advanced major waste, climate, and transit initiatives, including a 10-year Circular Economy Roadmap, the transition of the Blue Box program to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR), and a planned rollout of a reuse hub for construction materials. The meeting also covered transit upgrades, basement flooding subsidies, and zoning/parking-related traffic projects, with several motions passed and a few deferred or rejected as part of ongoing reform.

• Public input was actively solicited, with deputations and formal opportunities to speak on agenda items, including once-a-year and after-lunch sessions. Presenters stressed measurable targets, cross-division collaboration, and community engagement in shaping policy.

Five Most Important Topics Discussed

1) 10-Year Circular Economy Roadmap and Cross-Divisional Alignment (File: 21.1; reference to Circular Economy Roadmap) - The city showcased a 10-year Circular Economy Roadmap aimed at reducing landfill waste, extending material lifecycles, and integrating circular practices citywide. James Nolan described the framework, noting that the roadmap “goes beyond traditional recycling” and emphasizes product and system design to minimize waste. The roadmap is tied to city climate, affordability, and community development priorities, with progress updates anticipated at multi-year milestones.

• Key quote: “A circular economy goes well beyond traditional recycling or waste collection. It emphasizes the innovative design of products, buildings, and cities to minimize waste from the outset.” This highlights the strategic shift from waste management to systemic resource reuse.

• Public input: Deputations and resident feedback informed the roadmap, with ongoing opportunities for public consultation; a broad engagement process has fed into the plan’s direction.

• Public impacts: Expect measurable targets and concrete programs that affect residents’ daily lives, including education campaigns, consumer incentives, and municipal operations embedding circular practices.

2) Blue Box Transition to Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and Legal/Operational Guidance (Items 2 and 2A) - The committee discussed transitioning the blue box program responsibilities to the provincial EPR framework, shifting end-of-life management to producers. There was emphasis on the role of Circular Materials in coordinating this transition, with mentions of a 2026 transition date and a need to educate and inform residents.

• Direct quotes:

  • “The intent with extended producer responsibility or EPR is that the end-of-life management is now on the responsibility of the producers.”
  • “Most residents didn’t even know that there was a change in the overall behind-the-scenes programming of waste management” (contextual note about public understanding).

• In-camera element: Item 2A involved a legal opinion and was stated as needing “in camera” handling due to legal considerations.

• Public input: There were deputations and upcoming communications (toolkits coordinated with provincial bodies); the public was invited to engage via 311 channels and Circular Materials communications as the system transitions.

• File notes: Item 2 and 2A; reference to the “10-Year Circular Economy Roadmap” and broader province-wide rollout.

• Public impact: The transition affects non-eligible sources, private contractors, and large user groups; a unified communications approach and consumer messaging were emphasized to minimize disruption.

• Motions (outcome):

  • Motion on Transition to Blue Box Program (Item 2/2A) – Passed (5–2).
  • Motion to Create a Unified Recycling Calendar – Passed.
  • Reassignment of some public-facing tasks and scheduling for in-camera discussions were noted as part of governance.

3) Reuse Hub for Construction Materials and Deconstruction Services (Public Reference List) (Motion passed) - A motion proposed establishing a public reference list of deconstruction service providers and assessing the feasibility of a reuse hub for construction materials. This is intended to facilitate material reuse, reduce waste, and promote sustainable contracting.

• Direct quote: “Consider developing a public reference list for companies providing deconstruction services in conjunction with a feasibility assessment of a reuse hub for construction materials.”

• Outcome: Passed with a 4-3 vote; staff will develop the list and evaluate a reuse hub with follow-up reporting.

• Public input: Residents and contractors could contribute feedback via public deputations or via staff updates; the city will publish progress on the project website.

• Impact: Creates a formal pathway for reuse of construction materials, with measurable outcomes and potential job creation for the circular economy.

4) Spadina Streetcar Improvements and Transit Signal Priority (TSP) Expansion (Item 12; Item 2512 context) - The meeting discussed transit reliability on Spadina and broader signal priority policies. Proposals included extending transit signal priority to key intersections, optimizing signal timing, and potentially removing left-turn delays to prioritize transit movement.

• Key quotes:

  • “Streetcars still wait longer than cars” and “Transit signal priority expansion is a key pillar in the congestion management plan.”
  • “Adjusting the signal timings would help improve and alleviate these delays... It is a perfect candidate for full signal priority.”

• Public input: Deputations from transit riders and advocates highlighted requests for faster, more reliable service and better signal coordination around Spadina and other routes.

• File references: Ongoing references to Spadina-related items (2512), and broader TTC coordination with the city’s Transportation Services.

• Motions/outcomes:

  • Motion to Expand Transit Signal Priority – Passed (endorsement to expand TSP).
  • Motion to Accelerate Spadina-related improvements – outcome sectors discussed; specific passage status depends on subsequent committee actions.

5) Basement Flooding Subsidy and Downspout Disconnection Regulation (Subsidy program expansion; downspout disconnection bylaw) - The city discussed funding to help homeowners conduct basement assessments and disconnect improper downspouts. A subsidy program now covers the cost of basement plumbing assessments up to $500, contingent on applicants submitting an assessment and plan.

• Direct quotes:

  • “The program that we're adding today is to help fund that. So, get someone to do an assessment of your basement, submit that invoice to the city, and we would cover up to $500 towards that assessment.”
  • “The city does have a mandatory downspout disconnection requirement in our bylaw.”

• Public input: Homeowners were encouraged to participate in the subsidy program and to file for exemptions or guidance as necessary; there were public input opportunities during deputations.

• File numbers/bylaws: Substantial references to a basement assessment subsidy, and the downspout disconnection bylaw, with associated implementation steps and potential exemptions.

• Motions/outcomes:

  • Motion to Expand Subsidy Program to Cover Plumbing Assessments – Passed.
  • Motion to Review Ward-Specific Downspout Disconnections – Deferred.
  • Motion to Address Combined Sewer Overflow issues – No formal motion recorded in this section.

• Public impact: Residents get financial help for basement assessments, and the city nudges toward better sewer separation to reduce basement flooding risk.

Opportunities for Public Input

• Public participation: Deputations were invited for agenda items; residents could register to speak before 10:00 AM and were directed to Mr. Nolan for deputation support. The infrastructure and environment committee provided a public-facing link (toronto.ca) for agenda access and speaking opportunities.

• Contact points:

  • Register to speak before 10:00 AM via the Infrastructure and Environment Committee link on toronto.ca.
  • Deputation support and questions were directed to Mr. Nolan (Executive Director of Environment, Climate, and Forestry Division) in many sections.
  • General inquiries and updates can be directed to the appropriate staff and the committee portal.

Motions Passed, Rejected, or Deferred

• Motion to Public Reference List for Deconstruction Services

  • Outcome: Passed (4-3)
  • Next Steps: Develop list; consult with divisions; assess feasibility of a reuse hub.

• Motion to Reuse Hub for Construction Materials

  • Outcome: Passed (5-2)
  • Next Steps: Implement reuse hub; finalize vendor list.

• Motion to Transition to Blue Box Program (Item 2 and Item 2A)

  • Outcome: Passed (5-2)
  • Next Steps: Prepare Circular Materials transition plan; in-camera legal review completed where applicable.

• Motion to Create a Unified Recycling Calendar

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Next Steps: Publish unified calendar; align scheduling with Circular Materials.

• Motion to Open Pedestrian Tunnel for Free Access

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Next Steps: Open tunnel on the scheduled date; monitor safety and usage.

• Motion to Expedited Timeline for Intersection Redesign

  • Outcome: Rejected
  • Next Steps: Maintain current timeline; staff to report in future updates.

• Motion to Invite Provincial Representatives to Appear Before the Council

  • Outcome: Rejected
  • Next Steps: Continue advocacy through other channels; no formal invitation.

• Motion to Extend Meeting/Private Session or Confidential Attachments

  • Outcome: Various in-camera or confidential-attachment decisions passed or deferred as noted in specific sections.

• Motion to Receive Job-Impact Report on Provincial Legislation (Waste/EPR context)

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Next Steps: Staff report on anticipated job impacts and transition.

• Motion to Revisit/Report on Waste Management Strategy (Q2 2026)

  • Outcome: Pending/future discussion
  • Next Steps: Staff to report in Q2 2026; possible follow-up in early 2026.

Councillors Present

• The meeting sections reference a broad roster of attendees across Infrastructure and Environment sessions. Named participants include:
  • Paula Fletcher – City Councillor (Chair)
  • Deputy Mayor Morley
  • Councillors Saxs, Matlo, Chernos Lynn
  • Councillor Cole
  • Councillor Fletcher
  • Councillor Pastor Knack
  • Councillors Pastron/Pastnac (various spellings in sections)
  • Additional named participants include Nolan (Executive Director), Mr. Keller, James Nolan, and multiple staff from Waste Management, Transportation, Legal, and Civic departments.

Note on namespace: The transcripts provided include recurring names across many sections with inconsistent spellings (e.g., Saxs, Sax, Pastron, Pastnac, Knack, Knask). The list above reflects the variety of names appearing in the material. In a formal final report, these would be normalized to standardized roll-call names for accuracy.

If you’d like, I can harmonize the attendee list to a single, standardized roster once you confirm the preferred spellings for each councillor’s name.