← Back to summary
Full Transcript
Enrichment Fund Grants Approved - 20 May 26
Hamilton · May 21, 2026
Sound check. 1 2 3. Sound check. 1 2 3.
Welcome to the grant subcommittee
meeting for May 20th, 2026. Vice Chair,
Councelor for W 2 Cameron Cretch, joined
today by in the chambers by councelor
Tom Jackson, councelor Mark Tatterson,
online by chair Nan, councelor Wilson,
morning Wilson that is, and councelor
Matt Francis. Thanks for being here
today. Everyone's here. So, we have
quorum. Just a reminder that if your
phone is switched to an audible function
right now, please make it quiet um lest
it annoy your neighbor.
We'll move to the first item on our
agenda which is approval of the agenda.
Clerk Kelsey, are there any items to
include in the addendum?
>> The agenda items have been included on
the published agenda which is 6.1
delegation.
>> Okay. Can I have a mover and second to
approve the agenda as presented? Moved
by councelor Tatterson, seconded by
Chair Nan. Any discussion on today's
agenda?
I'm not seeing any. And this is a show
of hands. All those in favor?
Thanks. That's carried. We're on to
declarations of interest. Does anybody
have a conflict of interest they want to
declare for today's meeting either
disqualifying or non-disqualifying?
Seeing no hands, we'll move to item
number five, which is the approval of
the minutes of our previous meeting,
which was held on February the 18th of
this year. I have a mover and second to
adopt the minutes from our previous
meeting.
Not everybody at once now.
Councelor Tatison. Thank you so much.
And chair Nan, all those in favor of
approving the previous minutes, a show
of hands. Thank you so much. And that is
everyone. And that's carried. And now
we're on to delegations. Delegation 6.1
and Robert Rakuzi, the Festival of
Friends, respecting the Festival of
Friends 2025 city enrichment fund grant.
Uh delegate will be calling in today.
We're having a few phone related issues
as far as I understand in terms of how
we might be able to connect that
delegate by phone. We're going to just
pause for a moment and see if the
delegate can hear me and the delegate is
online and able to speak.
>> And right now the clerks are telling me
that he's not. So we'll just take a
brief pause in case he does call in
suddenly at this moment.
>> Yeah. What the clerks are telling me is
that what we can do is maybe hear him
after the items for consideration come
up at 8.1. So what I'll do is we'll
wait. We'll see if he calls in and we
can hear his delegation later because
the item to which he's speaking is 9.1.
So this time we're going to move ahead
to 8.1 then as delegate has not called
in. And 8.1 is G2603
which is the 2026 city enrichment fund
recommendations
and staff have asked for some more time
for their presentation today. Excitingly
if you know the procedural bylaw gives
everybody 10 minutes for a presentation
and they'd like to have 20. So they're
asking for 20 and councelor Jackson his
leap literally leaped from his seat to
move that motion. Would anybody anybody
else like to join councelor Jackson in
that enthusiasm as a seconder? Councelor
Tatterson, thank you so much. Oh,
councelor Francis's enthusiasm was
greater. So we're going to go to
councelor Francis as a seconder there.
Sorry, councelor Tatterson and um to
extend their presentation to 20 minutes.
This is a show of hands. All those in
favor
>> councelor Tatson wants to let us know
his enthusiasm as he drove here.
>> [laughter]
>> Um, I'll make sure you're second or next
time, councelor Tatis, and that carries.
Now, a staff presentation will be
delivered from Andrea Carvalo, adviser
for the city enrichment fund and
community outreach, and Rebecca Farat,
grants and strategic partnerships
coordinator, and I'm going to have them
go ahead and do the presentation, then
we'll receive it afterwards. But I think
Heather Anderson wants to introduce it.
Go ahead. Please introduce yourself.
>> Thank you very much. Good morning,
members of council, community
organizations, and the viewing public.
My name is Heather Anderson. I'm the
director of communications and
engagement. I'm joined this morning by
Andrea Carllo, advisor, city enrichment
fund and community outreach. Rebecca
Farat, grants and strategic partnerships
coordinator, and Manique Garwood,
business administrator, who together
oversee the role of the fund. Joining us
virtually and in person is the city
enrichment fund corporate team. also
behind me uh who directly support
applicants and bring subject matter
expertise to the ongoing development of
the CF program.
I am also joined by Lisa Abbott,
director of tourism and culture and
Sarah MKI, manager of creative
industries and cultural development.
An investment of 250,000 from the city
of Hamilton municipal accommodation tax
is recommended in support of the shared
goals of the CF arts and CCH areas and
the tourism strategy to strengthen
cultural development and the delivery of
impactful programming recognized at the
regional, provincial, and national
levels.
The 2026 CF recommendations before you
are the result of a highly competitive
year. Together with the multi-year
funding applications, we received 565
requests for funding, which is an
increase of 22% over last year.
The CF program has been [clears throat]
a steady in has seen a steady increase
in applications and requests since 2023
with new records set each year
reflecting greater access to municipal
support and a growing community need.
As an annual program, CF strives to be
responsible and accessible. Building on
that strength, the 2026 recommendations
reflect strategic targeted investments
to maximize community impact and sector
stability. All funding recommendations
have been carefully considered to ensure
program viability with adequ adequate
funding levels prioritized to A and B
rated applicants.
This appro approach is focused on
applicant merit, respons responsible
budgeting and investing in meaningful
public benefit.
There are 456 recommendations
totaling just over 7 million for your
consideration today. I will now invite
Andre and Rebecca to present an overview
of this year's CF cycle.
>> Thanks very much. as Andrea and Rebecca
make their way up to the presentation.
How we're going to do this is we're
going to listen to the presentation and
then when the presentation's done, we're
going to receive the presentation and if
there are any questions certainly we can
ask some of the presenters at that time.
Then we're going to put the report on
the floor and get a mover and secondary
and go from there.
>> Otherwise,
whenever you're ready to start
presenting, take it away.
>> Good morning. Uh, I'm Andrea Carvalo,
adviser to the city enrichment fund, and
I'm joined this morning by Rebecca
Farat, our grants and strategic
partnerships coordinator. I'll be
sharing an overview of the program and
key figures for the 2026 CF funding
cycle, along with some very exciting
data informed insights that demonstrate
the impact and performance of the
program.
All right. I'm going to walk us through
the CF program, introduce the team, and
share general updates. I will also be
sharing an overview of the assessment
and decision-making process, focusing on
the 2026 results and highlights in each
program area. Rebecca will be sharing
insights on grantee performance and
impact which is the result of multi-year
continuous improvement efforts that have
been focused on strengthening data
collection and performance measurement.
Our presentation also includes images
from last year's grantees that really
illustrate the breadth of our program
and reach across the city.
The CF program embraces a city's vision
to be the best place in Canada to raise
a child and age successfully.
The program decisions are driven by five
values. Increase transparency and
community impact. to evolve the program
to reflect funding best practices, to be
flexible, and to increase opportunities
and access to municipal funding.
We are only able to achieve this work
through the dedication of our corporate
team. Thanks to program managers Tyson
McMahon, Christina Durka, Carmen Bine,
Fernando Duk Drada, Whitney Cchac, and
Mike Seavoy who work closely with the
admin team to ensure excellent applicant
communication, support, and consistent
access and delivery to the city's annual
funding program.
CF operates throughout the year.
Launching in the fall, the team work
with the public sharing program
information with new and returning
applicants. Following the application
submission, the CF team quickly move
into the assessment period, which begins
with staff reviewing for eligibility and
performing financial reviews. In
preparing, of course, for the formal
adjudication process. This involves
several teams of staff, subject matter
experts, and external arms length
community adjudicators who together
carefully review and assess each
application. The results of which inform
the allocations and bring us to today
where we are presenting the 2026 results
and recommendations for your
consideration.
Following council's approval, our team
quickly move into proc processing the
grants, setting up the appeals process,
and inviting all applicants to meet with
staff to review their application and
share adjudicator feedback.
Now, who are CF applicants? The CF
program is very far-reaching, supporting
several sectors with an investment focus
on the notfor-profit community. This
includes incorporated organizations,
registered charities, community groups
operating as notfor-profits, and
professional artists that work within
the public realm. These are new groups,
wellestablished and long-standing
organizations, volunteer and
professional groups, equity-led and
serving organizations, and importantly,
all CEF funded programs and services
directly enrich the lives and
experiences of residents and visitors.
Now, what does that really look like? CF
funds organizations with mandates
supporting agriculture, arts,
communities, culture, and heritage,
community services, digital environment,
and the sport and active lifestyles
areas.
Specifically, these are Hamilton's fairs
and festivals, farmers markets, art
galleries, theaters, and music
organizations. These are community
choirs, culturally focused groups and
programs.
This looks like food banks, housing
support services, mental health support,
and newcomer programs.
CEF supports programs that help to make
sports inclusive and accessible, and
supports active living for equity
deserving groups, youths, and seniors,
only to name a few. With council's
support, the city invests in many
excellent programs and services
delivered throughout the year and in
every ward across the city.
The team is proud to make the process of
applying to CF as accessible as
possible. To do this, we email groups
directly, update our handbooks,
translate documents as needed, and offer
applicants the option to submit in the
language of their choice. Each year, we
host public information and drop-in
sessions and meet regularly with
applicants to provide one-to-one
support.
With council support, we are now in year
two of our multi-year funding pilot. We
launched the community services capacity
building stream that provides project
funding to support strengthening
organizations.
We are piloting a longer reporting
period for the one-time grants within
the creation and presentation stream.
And this year, we worked with City Lab
and McMaster University partners to use
our collected data to better examine
CF's impact, return on investment, and
grantee achievement.
By the numbers, staff facilitated 29
teams made up of 84 community and staff
adjudicators to review all 565
applications.
This work determines the final rating
between A, B, and C, which are eligible
for funding or D and D and Q rated
applications.
The funding recommendations before you
strive to meet the CF values, funding
principles, the city and council's
priorities. They are focused on
applicant merit, responsible budgeting,
and investments in meaningful public
benefit to maximize community impact.
The recommendations focus on A&B A and B
rated applications.
And I'm pleased to share the onetime
$250,000 investment through the city of
Hamilton municipal accommodation tax in
support of the shared goals of the
tourism and cultures strate tourism
strategy and the arts and communities
and culture and heritage program areas.
Since Thank you. Since 2022, the CF
program has experienced significant
growth and this year is no different.
with a 22% growth overall and
specifically an 11% growth in eligible
applications.
This tells us that more groups and
programs are seeking municipal funds.
There is greater visibility of the CEF
program and our community and its needs
continue to grow to ensure the city's
investments are strategic and that
feasible funding levels are recommended
this year. A and B rated and select
C-rated applications are recommended for
funding where possible. 225,
excuse me, where possible, 200 20 thou
last year's prior funding levels were
met uh for returning groups with a focus
on viable funding levels for new groups.
You will note that this differs from the
past three-year trend where all passing
applicaations were funded. Due to budget
pressures and the significant growth, it
is not possible to fund all passing
applications in 2026.
So the results we received again 565
applications with a total request just
over 13 million. This year's funding
recommendations include the $250,000
investment from the city's Matt Reserve
together with the CF budget of 6.7
million brings this year's total
investment to 7,19,443.
This includes allocations to multi-year
funding grantees and this year's
eligible single year applications.
noting that the 6.7 million CEF budget
reflects the $1 million transfer of
funds supporting the Art Gallery of
Hamilton, now managed through the
tourism and culture division. Otherwise,
the CF budget remains unchanged from
2025.
I would now like to briefly share a few
highlights from the year. It is the
unique programs and specific details
from each CF area that illustrate the
growth, the need and impact and relate
these results to our own experiences
throughout the city.
Agriculture saw considerable growth in
applications with new unique community
garden programs that are focused on
culturally relevant food growing and
education.
The three multi-year funding grantees
represent the annual fairs, annual fall
fairs.
Uniquely, the arts program is assessed
by full arms length adjudication teams.
The majority of applicants to this area
are from returning organizations with
new applicants well represented in the
creation and presentation stream.
Our
third largest area, communities,
culture, and heritage, is known for
funding many grassroot programs, diverse
cultural heritage organizations, and
events that bring communities and
neighbors together.
Our largest area, community services,
funds critical human service programs
and local social safety initiatives.
Notably, 16 new programs are recommended
for funding through the emerging needs
and capacity building streams.
The digital program experienced
tremendous growth this year with many of
these programs supporting newcomers and
residences residents experiencing
systemic barriers to digital access.
This area is unique in that we work
closely with the RR Macan Foundation
that offers matching grants to
successful charitable CEF digital
grantees. We first began working with
the foundation to launch the digital
area and are pleased to continue this
part partnership for the next two years.
Another major growth area environment
received a significant number of new
applications. New initiatives include
innovative waste reduction programs and
green space accessibility for youth and
seniors.
The sport and active lifestyles area has
experienced steady growth in the last
few years, making it the area receiving
the second highest number of
applications.
The sport and active lifestyle areas
funds in many different capacities
supporting inclusion, accessibility,
long-term active living, and funds many
different sports and ways that residents
can be active.
I'm now going to invite Rebecca to walk
us through the 2026 community priorities
idea and CF program impact.
Thank you. Good morning. Rebecca Farat,
grants and strategic partnerships
coordinator.
When applying to CEF, applicants are
required to indicate which of the
community priorities from the city of
Hamilton strategic plan our future
Hamilton their project supports and
describe how it does so. Applicants are
able to select multiple priorities when
more than one is applicable. The highest
representation is for the community
engagement and participation priority
from our future Hamilton while the
lowest being to build environment and
infrastructure. The wide range of
programs receiving CEF grants help work
towards accomplishing these important
community priorities and leveraging the
good work of the not for-profit and
charitable organizations across our
city.
Initiated in 2023, CF began collecting
idea inclusion, diversity, equity, and
accessibility data that measured grantee
program targeted populations and equity
in organizational governance.
2026 reflects the fourth year collecting
this data and comparing it. At a high
level, grantees are indicating greater
diversity in their governance and are
more intentional in targeting audiences
and their clients. Looking at the
grantee targeted audiences data,
grantees are being deliberate and
thoughtful about the audiences they
serve. As of 2026, only 34% of CF funded
programs are designed for universal
access or have no targeted population.
This is an improvement from 57% in 2023
when we began tracking. Direct targeting
of all equity deserving groups has
increased in 2026 and are the highest
levels since tracking began. New
grantees to CF are serving racialized
peoples and communities at a slightly
higher rate than returning groups, 41%
compared to 38%. In all other areas, our
returning grantees to CF are serving
equity deserving groups at higher rates.
Grantee governance employment equity
designated groups are increasingly
present at the governance tables of CF
grantees. Returning grantees have higher
rates of equity designated groups
present within their governance
structure and just 1% of returning
applicants have no equity present at
their governance tables. Additionally,
we are seeing a sustained transition
towards greater numbers of equity
deserving groups around the governance
tables with returning groups reporting
high metrics for two or more equity
deserving groups present.
New this year, we are pleased to be
sharing details on the return on
investment and impact from CF grantees.
The data presented today is aggregated
from the final reports of all 2024
grantees. This research was empowered in
part through a partnership with a class
of students from McMaster's degree
school of business and facilitated by
our colleagues at City Lab.
To begin, it's important to understand
that while CF is an important revenue
tool for grantees, across the entirety
of the program, CF makes up just 9% of
the total funding of these projects and
their deliverables and the impacts that
they have in our community. The not
for-profit and charitable sector funded
by CF also leverages other government
and foundational support, earned
revenues, and fundraising from private
individuals in order to fund their
programs. We are proud that CF is one
lever supporting these programs.
For every $1 invested by CF into these
programs, an additional $9.70
is invested from other sources. Funding
from foundations, provincial, and
federal sources make up $4.30 of this.
While we cannot definitively say that
without CF, these groups would not still
be able to leverage these other dollars,
we do know anecdotally and from the work
that our team does that there are both
federal and provincial grants that
require the evidence of municipal
support. Often this is shown through CF.
In order to access these funds, we sign
off on documents showing that yes, they
got a CF grant, so they're eligible to
get federal or provincial support. We
know that municipal support is often
also a confidence bringinger to private
donors and helps organizations show
their value and trustworthiness. An
example of this is our own partnership
within the CEF program wherein the
matching funds are made available to
charitable organizations funded in the
digital program area through the RR
Macan family foundation to those granted
by CF.
But the impacts of CF grantees are more
than the that of leveraged return on
investment alone. There are also the
tangible community impacts.
Approximately 2.7 million people
participated in programs funded by CF in
2024 and 84% of that participation was
free in nature. The cost to the
municipality for those participating in
CF funded programs is just $2.78 cents a
person. And for every one grant awarded,
approximately 50.3 events or programs
are delivered across the year.
17,866
events or programs were delivered in
2024 through CF funding. And when broken
down by dollars, we are seeing that
there are approximately 360 participants
per $1,000 granted. With final reporting
for our 2025 grantees just wrapping up
on April 30th, we are additionally
looking forward to beginning to analyze
this data over time for trends and to
allow database decision-making when
considering program enhancements. We're
looking at how funding can continue to
improve these impacts. Investments in CF
tangibly help community organizations
make a difference in the realms of our
strategic plan, delivering on equity,
and delivering impact for every dollar
invested.
Today's recommendations look to the
future and continue to recommend that CF
funding be distributed broadly and to
those demonstrating merit through the
adjudication process. We look forward to
seeing the impact that the 2026 CF
grantees will continue to have in our
community.
Thank you.
Thank you very much for your
presentation. Take that down now. Are
there questions
for the presenters on the presentation
today?
Seeing councelor Jackson,
go ahead.
>> Uh thank you and good morning, Vice
Chair Cretch. Thank you uh for the uh
excellent thorough presentation uh
senior advisor Carvello and coordinator
fraud.
>> [clears throat]
>> So let me just um see if I captured what
you presented in my uh own cursory way
[snorts] in an accurate way and please
correct me if I didn't. Um was there a
total of then 565
applications to my knowledge that
included 102 multi- uh qualified through
you uh vice chair to whoever wants to
answer that please.
>> Through the chair yes we did have 103
multi-year funding grantees. We had one
uh grantee who unfortunately was unable
to move forward with their program this
year, the 91st Highlanders. We worked
with them to ensure that uh the funds in
some capacity were not required this
year. Uh they do remain in good standing
as the reasons for the program not
occurring this year were outside of
their control.
>> If I recall that was due to a facility
that no longer was available, the
Armory. So thank you for that. So uh you
had then total of 463 net but 456
qualified. Can you explain the seven gap
difference there through you vice chair
and if I'm incorrect always senior
adviser you can correct me anytime
through the chair. Sorry councelor
Jackson can you repeat the numbers for
me? Okay. So from 565 you said there
were 103 but one didn't qualify because
of the unfortunate circumstances the
91st Highlander. So 102 I [snorts]
subtract 102 from 565. That leaves my
math 463 and you said though 456
qualified. Can you explain please?
>> Through the chair. I'll do my best.
>> Okay. Uh so we were able to recommend
funding to 456
applicants uh but all not all passing
applicants uh received
were recommended for funding. So there
is a difference there in the number of
those passing and then those receive
recommending funding today.
>> Okay that I think that explains that for
me further vice chair crutch
uh let's see here. So altogether then we
have now removed with council's
endorsement the 1 million annual for the
art gallery of Hamilton that's in a
different stream correct through you
vice chair
>> through the chair. Yes that is well I'll
correct myself it is not through a
different CF stream it now sits with the
tourism and culture division who now
manage that portfolio. Okay. So, we
would have been around 8 million in um
available funds, but that's why we're
sitting at around 7 million currently.
Correct.
>> Correct.
>> Okay. On reserves, one of my favorite
topics, senior adviser, and I know the
business administrator um always raises
her eyebrows when I get into reserves.
Uh that was a that was a respectful
comment. Um we have 245,141
in reserves. Um we're uh how much is
left what is the net amount left after
appeals process and any other
deductions? What do we have left as a
committee through you vice chair?
>> Uh good morning Winnie Garwood business
administrator. Uh so we starting out uh
today at 245,141
in our reserve. That's the unodudited
balance. As you know, we had some impact
from the cyber incident and so that
value is not reflecting interest acred
uh interest earned for 2024 and 2025. So
that value is subject to change later,
but we're starting out at 245,141.
Uh we do have some items included for
recommendation today. Uh do you need the
balance after those um pending approval
or
>> Sure. Why don't you walk us through the
pending um okay recommendations, please,
if that's okay with the vice chair.
>> Thank you.
>> Through the chair. So, we do have a
recommendation um for $50,000 to fund
our appeals program and there's a
pending um motion for $90,000 to fund
Festival of Friends. Pending those
approvals, the balance will be 105,141
remaining in the reserve.
>> Terrific business administrator. That
kind of wraps up for me uh vice chair
and I just want to put this committee on
notice as I did the last couple of years
where there are groups and organizations
vice chair where unfortunately um they
didn't receive what their full ask was
they got a passing grade whatever it was
AB uh selective C's um but I will be
bringing motions forward hopefully as in
the past gaining council's support to
provide balances so that those great
organizations festivals, events can
carry on. And of course, it would be
from either my budget or multiple
budgets across uh the city. Thanks, Vice
Chair Cretch, for your indulgence.
>> No problem. You're the only speaker on
the list, Councelor Jackson, so you're
permitted to go ahead. On that note, I
don't see any further questions here.
So, I'm going to receive the
presentation if I have a mover and
second to receive the presentation.
Moved by Councelor Chhattis, seconded by
Chair Nan. And I'm going to have that's
a show of hands vote to receive the
presentation. All those in favor is so
received. And now we're going to have a
mover and second to put the report on
the floor
for the grants themselves. Moved by
councelor Jackson, seconded by Chair
Nan.
Is there any discussion further
discussion on this item?
Not seeing further discussion. So we'll
go to the electronic vote and I'll let
you know when it's up.
It's up. Please vote.
Counselors Jackson and Tison are in
favor.
Councelor Wilson is also in favor.
And that carries six to zero.
We're now on to 9.1, but we're going to
pause first because we're going to see
if the delegate is now available. Uh,
Robert Racuzzi, if you can hear me. Uh,
you have five minutes for your
delegation. I know you're calling in by
phone. Uh, go ahead and let's see if we
can hear you.
>> Hello. Can you hear me?
>> We can hear you. So, go ahead. You've
got five minutes and I'll let and you'll
hear it. You might not hear the ding
sound, but if you go over the five
minutes, I'll just let you know.
>> Okay, perfect. Uh, first of all, thank
you for having me. I'm sorry for the
delay. I uh broke my ankle last night
and had surgery and otherwise I would uh
be with you guys today. Um just want to
talk about a couple quick issues. So the
first is I'm coming today in regards to
the $90,000 that we were awarded last
year for the Festival of Friends and due
to some accounting
um issues and delays um not on our end
but on our accounting firm's end uh we
missed the deadline to provide our
financials. So just to give a little bit
of a background when COVID came um one
of the challenges that comes with
running the the any event for the CF is
the audited financial statements. Often
we find ourselves receiving $90,000 uh
from the the program which of course is
incredible and it means the world to us
but we also end up spending you know 16
17 $18,000 in order to report those
financials. I'm not suggesting that's no
good, but often we need funds in order
to uh to forward that process. So when
COVID came, um we were unable to do our
financials due to a lack of funds for a
couple years. And as we got back on our
feet, we found ourselves delayed year
after year after year. Um and then
working with uh the city staff,
especially Andrea Cardalo and Christina
Durka, who've been incredible. Um, we
were able to come up with a plan in
order to work with the accounting firm
to get uh financial statements combined
with audited statements to get us caught
up up to 2024.
And we put that process in play this
time last year. And unfortunately uh
because our accounting firm has uh
sometimes has higher priorities than us
uh we kept getting pushed on the back
burner and as our deadline approached we
kept missing the the the deadlines and
we did not get our final audit
statements completed until March of this
year which was about 3 months past what
the deadline was. So I'm not coming to
you today to ask for more money. I'm not
asking for uh anything extra. I'm just
looking to have the funds released that
we were uh uh awarded last year. And you
know, as the Festival of Friends
approaches its 50th anniversary this
summer, um I think it's important when
you see events such as uh Sound of
Music, you know, a 48-year-old event
that that died. Um we're seeing other
events failing and having an issue. The
Festival of Friends is strong. There's
nothing wrong with our financial
statements. There's nothing problematic
with the organization. We are
financially strong. We have incredible
backing. Tim Hortons and a lot of other
wonderful corporations. We are just uh
we are stronger than ever. We're putting
on the biggest festival ever. We're
going to have a big all-star night this
year. And you know, I think one of the
things I think gets lost and if you
haven't been to the Festival of Friends
since we came back to Gage Park about
nine years ago now, I think it's
important to see uh what the event has
become. It is the biggest stage. It's
the largest crowd. We bring 18 to20
million in economic revenue. Um, for an
example, last year we had the artist
Brett Kell, a country music artist that
may not be for everybody, but definitely
is for a large portion of the
population. And we offered that act for
free. Well, to put it in perspective,
there is a new music festival called
Route 905. It's in Lancaster this
summer, and they're charging $89 to see
Brett Kistle in a festival setting. So I
think often the festival of friends is
often taken for granted as an insanely
large event. We appear in textbooks in
Alberta and you know we are the most
efficiently run grassroots organization.
65% of all the money we've spent last
year was spent on either artists both
local and those that draw tourists as
well as and staging. We are efficiently
run. Our wages are only about 12%. That
includes honorariums, that includes my
salary, that includes our vendor people.
Um, we are a welloiled, efficient
machine who spends the money better and
wiser than anybody else. And I think
that's uh my five minutes.
>> Thanks very much for dialing in. I see
that there is a question from councelor
Nan. Councelor Nan, go ahead.
>> Thank you, Vice Chair Cretch. And uh
good morning, Robert. Sorry to hear
about your medical emergency. I hope you
recover well. Uh that's um yeah disapp
disappointing but I'm also sure uh
really hard for you to navigate in this
moment that you wanted to be in the room
in chambers um with committee. So if you
could please just speak to um I know
this year is the 50th anniversary which
is a big big deal not only for the
festival but also for the city of
Hamilton as well as music lovers who
loved coming to Gage Park but can you
speak a little bit about what you've had
to do internally? You mentioned the work
that you've done with staff to bring
your financial statements um into order.
How are you ensuring this doesn't occur
again?
>> Um well in this particular case I mean
co was in this up until co we were
bringing in our statements yearly on
time. Um and it was just a matter of
getting caught up uh the accounting firm
especially after co was afraid of uh
organizations not paying their bills. So
a lot of what we've been having to do is
prepay uh leading up to it and
thankfully the firm understood that in
order to get caught up. So we spoke so
staff essentially said that we were as
of the beginning of last year the last
granting period we had provided the
audit statements for 2022 and 2023 was
in process and in order to make the
process uh a little cheaper for us. We
were able to work it out where we would
2023 would be um a non- audited
statement and 2024 would be audited. And
so the accounting firm was able to give
us a significant break on the unodudited
statements and they we bundled them
together as they could do them all at
once. It's quicker and more efficient
for them. And it was the city staff who
was able to say, you know, if you can
provide us with 2024,
we'll take 2023 unodudited um with the
assurance from the accounting firm that
it all made sense going forward. And by
doing that, we were able to get
ourselves caught up. Now, for 2025, uh
the affirm has all of our books. Um they
have assured us that um we will have uh
that they will have it by the deadline
of the application deadline, which I
believe is like middle of November this
year. Uh it's now that we're caught up,
um it's no longer an issue. It's just a
matter of us trying to get out of that
hole from CO, you know, and there's it's
a lot of it is we got especially right
after COVID, it was a matter of like we
had to put ourselves back on the map.
So, it's very hard to try to allocate
funds and say, you know, this might
bring another 20,000 people. Um, and
maybe, you know, and the accounting firm
can perhaps we can, you know, delay that
a couple months so that we can get that
working uh to get things done. But, um,
as as it stands right now, we are we are
up to date and we will have last year by
the time the the end of this uh this
this period is over, which is the
schedule.
>> Thank you. That's what I wanted to hear.
vice chair uh in terms of uh
anticipating the reports that would be
required and the deadline that would be
needed to be met uh for these funds to
be allocated and uh just to confirm
again uh through you chair to Robert um
this is again funds that were granted
initially to your organization in the
festival but due to the financial
components not being met were withheld
by the city. Correct.
>> That is that is correct. does not
additional money.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you. I don't see additional folks
on the list. So, at this time, we're
going to go move to receive the
delegation. Have a move and second to do
so. Moved by councelor Nan.
I'll second that. All those in favor of
receiving the dele delegation by show of
hands.
That is everyone and the delegation is
received. Thank you very much. At this
time, we're now going to move on to 9.1,
the Festival of Friends 2025 city
enrichment fund grant. It's a motion
from councelor Nan, seconded by myself.
Councelor N, please introduce your
motion.
>> Certainly. Thank you, uh, vice chair.
and um the whereas clauses and really
appreciating staff doing the due
diligence of ensuring that everything
was documented in terms of um the funds
that were granted, the financial
statements not coming in on time and
then the work that was done to bring it
into compliance. Uh so as mentioned by
the delegate this morning, u these are
not new funds. This is to release funds
that the organization was um had gone
through the screening process and had
been cleared to receive $90,000. So
therefore be it resolved is that the
2025 CF grant allocated to Festival of
Friends totaling $90,000 be funded one
time from the CF reserve account 112230
and B that staff are authorized and
directed to execute any required
agreements and incillary documents um as
is our standard practice. Thank you.
Thanks very much. I don't see anybody on
the list to speak to this motion. And so
we'll go to the electronic vote. Thank
you. Councelor Jackson's in favor.
Councelor Tison's also in favor. And the
vote is up.
And the vote carries 620. And being that
there are no notices of motion and we've
already approved the private and
confidential item, there's no further
business for today. And today's meeting
is adjourned at 10:12 a.m. Enjoy the
rest of your day, everybody, and thank
you for being here.