Budget Subcommittee at Etobicoke Civic Centre - January 21, 2026 - 1:30 PM

By GPT-4 & Parth on 2026-01-25, City: Toronto, View Transcript

City Council Meeting – Consolidated Report

High-level summary - The meeting covered public budgeting input for 2026, housing affordability and accessibility, and environmental/infrastructure initiatives (including transit and climate-related projects). Key decisions included advancing several capital projects and climate/housing programs, formalizing public input processes, and approving targeted budget provisions, while some budget items were discussed but not decided in these excerpts.

Five most important topics (2-3 sentences each, with quotes where relevant)

1) Public participation in the 2026 budget - The session stressed broad public involvement in shaping the 2026 budget, with in-person or online deputations and written submissions via email. Public input was framed as essential before the budget recommendations to the mayor. - Quote: “This is the public's opportunity to speak about the budget. It is also our opportunity to consider your comments and input before we make our recommendations to the mayor.”

2) Accessible and affordable housing for people with disabilities - Deputants highlighted the urgent need for deeply affordable and accessible housing and noted data gaps on accessible units. They called for dedicated funding to research accessibility gaps and to expand housing that is both affordable and accessible. - Quotes: - “Toronto is home to hundreds of thousands of people with a range of disabilities... we work in collaboration to advance disability, poverty reduction, deeply affordable and accessible housing, and accessible transit.” - “It is urgent that the city direct additional investment into primary prevention by increasing the number of new units that are deeply affordable and accessible so disabled Torontonians are justly housed.” - “From what I have reviewed, there's not even a mandatory section in the MURA submission to indicate accessible upgrades.”

3) Housing initiatives and eviction prevention (Dun House Phase 2; rent banks; MURA) - Proponents urged sustained funding for housing supports, emphasizing cost-savings and health benefits. Dun House Phase 2 was highlighted as advancing stable, permanent housing for more residents, with evidence of reduced emergency healthcare usage. - Quotes: - “When completed, 54 more people will be moving off the streets, out of hospital, and into stable, permanent, supportive housing.” - “In the first year alone, Dunhouse saved more than $2 million in healthcare. Not a bad rate of return on an investment that cost $14 million.” - “We are losing affordable homes faster than we can build them.” (referencing eviction prevention and rent bank initiatives)

4) Indoor air quality (IAQ) in schools and public spaces - IAQ concerns were raised, focusing on poor ventilation in schools and older buildings, with calls for a city-wide IAQ policy, upgraded HVAC systems, and public monitoring. The issue was framed as both a health and equity concern. - Quotes: - “Indoor air policies are not only an accessibility issue, but also an equity issue, as many buildings with poor ventilation are typically found in less affluent neighborhoods.” - “Kids are continually subjected to this poor air quality... Clean indoor air is not a luxury. It's a right protected by the World Health Organization and the United Nations.”

5) Climate, transit, and urban development initiatives - Deputants advocated for climate-friendly infrastructure, transit affordability, and urban greening, including tree canopy expansion. There were calls for better climate-program communication and ongoing investments in sustainable projects, with several budget-related motions noted. - Quotes: - “The TTC fare freeze for the third consecutive year is a positive step for equity and environmental sustainability.” - “Let’s explore apartment-sized heat pumps as a dual solution for heating and cooling.” - “Community-based research is not an add-on. It's an essential infrastructure for a safer city.”

File numbers / bylaws discussed - No specific file numbers or bylaw numbers were cited in these excerpts. The discussion referenced program names, budget line items, and project titles rather than formal file references.

Opportunities for public input (how residents can participate) - Email submissions to BUC@toronto.ca and review materials via toronto.ca/council; written input is considered before the budget recommendations are finalized. - Deputations were encouraged in person or online, with time limits (e.g., five minutes per speaker). Public consultations and budget town halls were referenced as ongoing engagement opportunities.

Motions passed, rejected, or deferred (titles and outcomes)

Councillors present - Gord Perks - Chris Moise - Amber Morley - Stephen Holyday (online) - Shelley Carroll - Lily Cheng - Jamaal Myers - Councillor Chang (referenced in another section) - Councillor Mley (referenced in another section)

Public comments addressed - Public comments covered housing accessibility, rent banks and eviction prevention, IAQ in schools, transit affordability, and climate/infrastructure investments. Deputants urged prioritizing housing stability, accessibility upgrades, and climate resilience to reduce long-term public health costs.

Notes and next steps - Several items point to follow-up actions (design reviews, project leads for TRCA projects, data on accessible housing, expansion of MURA, etc.) that will be carried into future meetings. If you want, I can tailor this to a single date or extract only the sections that match a specific meeting agenda and provide a tighter, date-specific summary.

Back to Home