← Back to summary
Full Transcript
Council Tackles Repeat Offender Crisis - 17 Jun 26
Brampton · June 19, 2026
Check one two. Testing audio. Check one
two.
Check one two.
Good morning, councelor T. Can we check
your audio, please?
>> Good morning, Mike Chuck.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you.
Good morning everyone. We're going to
begin.
As we begin today's meeting, we would
like to acknowledge that we are
gathering here today on the traditional
territories of the Missosagas of the
Credit, Hodnosi, and Wendat nations who
have called this land home since time
immemorial. We recognize the Missagas of
the Credit as the original rights
holders and the signitories of Treaty
19, the Agettton's purchase of 1818 and
the agreements made therein that are
foundational to our nation to nation
relationship. As a city, we are
committed to our ongoing role in
reconciliation through meaningful action
rooted in truth, justice, and respect.
We are grateful to the original
caretakers of this land who have ensured
that we able to work, play, and live in
Bmpton now and in the future. Good
morning and welcome to our meeting of
Bmpton's committee of council. I will
ask the clerk to do the roll call.
Thank you, Chair Forante. We have all
members of council with us today in
chambers with councelor Tur online and
deputy mayor Singh joining shortly.
>> Thank you very much madame clerk.
Approval of the agenda. Does any member
wish to add a business item to today's
meeting? Councelor Keenan.
>> Thank you through you, Mr. Chair. I'd
like to add an inc camera item regarding
golden age village of the elderly. Uh
under exception under section 2392C of
the municipal act 2001 proposed or
pending acquisition or deposition of
land by the municipality or local board.
>> Thank you. Councelor Plesie. Thank you
Mr. Chair. Mr. Chair, I'd like to add
two items to the agenda. One, an in
camera matter about an identifiable
individual. I've spoken with the city
city solicitor to get the thumbs up for
that. Uh the other one is a motion uh
that I'd like to present next week, but
I wanted to at least have the discussion
just on gas pricing and and how it
relates to uh city business.
>> Thank you very much councelor Plesley.
Councelor T.
>> Thank you uh through Mr. Chair. Just a
request actually to vary the agenda
order. There is one delegation uh that
is a delegation for a staff presentation
from economic development. Uh if I could
have the staff presentation and then
follow that with the delegation um at
the appropriate time in the agenda.
That's just my own request on that.
>> Thank you very much. See no other
speakers, I'd like to also add a
discussion item in regards to the Santa
Claus parade and also request that uh
the clerk's office add to today's agenda
correspondence received by all members
of this committee from the Santa Claus
parade.
Thank you. So I'll ask the clerk to
summarize the additions.
with
>> Madame Clerk.
>> Thank you, Chair Versante. The following
items have been added to the agenda.
Discussion item 9.3.2 Santa Claus parade
and correspondence for 12.4.1
from Scotching regarding the Santa Claus
Parade. Um, Council Kenan has added 15.8
8 Golden Age Village for the elderly
long-term care long-term lease for
affordable housing. Councelor Plesi has
added 15.9, a closed item about an
identifiable individual. And councelor
Tour has requested that the agenda order
be varied to bring forward presentation
11.1.1
prior to the delegation um relating to
that presentation. And we've um added a
discussion item for councelor Plesi
regarding GA prices um to give notice of
a motion for our next agenda. And we
have received information from the indis
community services that they have
withdrawn their delegation item 15.7.
>> Thank you very much. And if members of
committee will also indulge, we will be
varying the order of the delegations
later on for Kathleen McDermad and Mike
Argos to the last position on the
delegation list. So I have a motion
moved by councelor Keenan to approve the
agenda as amended. All in favor? That
carries. Does any member uh have a
declaration of pecuniary interest under
the municipal conflict of interest act
for any matter to be considered on
today's agenda? Seeing none, I will ask
the clerk to note for the meeting
minutes. Committee. As part of our
consent motion process, I will read each
agenda item that is subject to the
consent motion, and any member may
verbally identify the item to be held
for debate during the meeting. Any item
not held for debate will be considered
as part of the consent motion and voted
on for approval. I'll start by reading
the relevant agenda items and members
can identify any items to be held for
debate. Item 7.1, staff update on
government relation matters. I would
like to have that held. Item 8.2.1,
staff report, budget amendment,
developer reimbursement for the
construction of Khurst Avenue plan
43M2164,
ward 6. That is in consent. Item 6 8.2.2
two staff report budget amendment
developer reimbursement for the
construction of the pedestrian trail and
bridge plan 43M2143
in war dates that is in consent item
8.2.3 staff report budget amendment and
request to begin procurement for Bmpton
city hall elevators replacement ward one
>> held by councelor plesi [snorts] item
8.2.4 Four staff report request to begin
procurement office furniture supply
delivery and installation. That is in
consent. Item 8.2.5
staff report request to begin
procurement and budget amendment for
Howen Recreation Center and Library held
by councelor Keenan. Item 8.2.6 staff
report special event road closures.
Canada celebrates the FIFA World Cup
2026 community activation in WS 1 and
three. That is in consent. Item 8.2.7,
staff report, amendments to the site
alteration bylaw. That is in consent.
Item 8.3.1,
the minutes of the environment advisory
committee for June 2nd, 2026.
In consent. Item 8.3.2, the minutes of
the Bmpton School Traffic Safety Council
for June 11, 2026. In consent. Item
9.2.1, 2.1 a staff report request
request to begin procurement the Rose
Theater stage upgrade ward 1 that is in
consent item 10.2.1
staff report proposed amendments to
business licensing and administrative
penalties bylaw in consent. Item 10.2.2
2 staff staff report for the residential
rental licensing program interim update
held by councelor
Santos item 10.3.1 the minutes of the
accessibility advisory committee for May
26 2026
that is in consent item 11.1.1 the staff
presentation for the BMPon next results
will be held for delegations
item 12.2.1 2.1, a staff report
recognizing and commemorating the 100th
anniversary of the Royal Canadian
Legion. In consent, item 12.2.2 staff
report development charges financial
administration updates. In consent, item
12.2.3,
staff report, annual asset management
plan progress report for June 2026.
That is in consent. Item 12.2.4, Four
agreements executed by administrative
authority for January 1 to March 31st,
2026.
In consent, item 12.2.5 staff report
regarding enact the new procurement
bylaw. In consent, item 13.1, our
referred matters list. That is in
consent. And then for in camera we have
15.1 project update Chris Gibson
recreation center addition and
renovation ward one that is in consent
>> opened
>> held by councelor tour. Item 15.2 Gore
Meadows and Rosley tennis facilities
leases administrative update wards 1 and
10. That is in consent. Item 15.3
project update center for innovation
heritage theater and city lands wards
one and three in consent please
>> held by councelor tour. Thank you.
>> Item 15.4 Bmpton transit update
in consent. Item 15.5
agreement of purchase and sale for a
countryside widening project in ward 10
in consent. And 15.6 6 project update
and funding request ward 4
>> hold
>> held by councelor
Keenan
and we've withdrawn 15.7
and we've added golden age village for
the elderly long-term lease for
affordable housing
>> I will which is 158 yes thank you
>> and 15.9 will be dealt with
Identifiable individual.
>> It's a matter added by councelor Plesi
regarding an identifiable individual.
I'll ask the clerk to summarize the
items to be included in the consent
motion.
>> You chair Vante. The following items
will be included on the consent motion.
8.2.1 staff report budget amendment
developer reimbursement for the
construction of Khurst Avenue.
8.2.2 2 staff report budget amendment
developer reimbursement for the
construction of pedestrian trail and
bridge 8.2.4 staff report request to
begin procurement office furniture
supply delivery and installation 8.2.6
staff report special event road closures
8.2.7
staff report amendments to sideleration
bylaw 8.3.1 minutes environmental
advisory committee 8.3.2 2 minutes BMPon
Tra school traffic safety council 9.2.1
staff report requests to begin
procurement the Rose Theater stage
upgrade 10.2.1 staff report proposed
amendments to business licensing and
administrative penalties bylaw
10.3.1
Minutes of the Accessibility Advisory
Committee
12.2.1 2.1 staff report recognizing and
commemorating the 100th anniversary of
the Royal Canadian Legion. 12.2.2 staff
report development charges financial
administration updates. 12.2.3 staff
report annual asset management plan
progress report 12.2.4 staff report
agreements executed by administrative
authority. 12.2.5 staff report enact the
new procurement bylaw. 13.1 referred
matters list. and enclosed 15.2 Gore
Meadows and Rosalie tennis facilities
leases 15.4 Bmpton transit update and
15.5 agreement of purchase and sale for
countryside widening project.
>> Thank you very much madam clerk. I
believe the city solicitor had something
to add.
>> Uh actually through Mr. chair I what we
I just wanted to add that identifiable
individuals 239 sub 2 subb normally I'm
uh asked as to what section it's falling
under so
>> thank you very much for adding that I
see councelor bar on the board
>> thank you Mr. Chair three Mr. Chair just
want to hold 15.4
>> 15.4 for the Bmpton transit update now
held by councelor Bar.
So noted by the clerk.
I see no other addition. So I ask for a
motion moved by councelor tour to
approve our consent motion. All in
favor? Any opposed? And that carries.
Next members of committee will move on
to announcements. And we have one
announcement today regarding parkscapes
2026 roots in the park. This is
sponsored by regional counselor tour.
Michael Vickers, our executive director
of the Bmpton Arts Organization, will be
making the announcement. Michael.
We'll ask Michael to come down and
and thank you for the greenery, Michael.
>> You're very welcome. Thank you very
much. If I may, I'm going to pass the
mic to our head of programming, Katie
Belshaw.
>> Thank you, Katie. And I have the artists
with me behind me as well for today.
Okay. Good morning, mayor and members of
council. My name is Katie Belshaw, head
of programming with the Bmpton Arts
Organization. Thank you for the
opportunity to celebrate the launch of
Parkscapes 2026, a summer-long
initiative that will bring free arts
programming into Bmpton Parks, some of
the best in the country across July and
August.
Parkscapes is about something simple but
powerful. Helping residents feel
connected to their neighborhoods and to
nature through arts, culture, and shared
public spaces. Our theme for the year,
Roots in the Park, explores movement,
migration, pathways, and how communities
come together through shared
experiences.
Across four parks, local Bmpton artists,
these folks behind me, and collectives
will lead the public in free weekly
handon hands-on programming from
sunprinting workshops and nature
journaling to dance movement and improv
sessions for seniors. Next slide,
please.
In addition to our city support, we have
secured support from the Ontario
Trillium Foundation, the Toronto and
Region Conservation Authority, and the
Government of Canada's New Horizons for
Seniors program. each helping us deliver
accessible programming to residents
while also providing paid professional
opportunities and skill development for
local artists. Our featured artists this
year include Aditi Ganiv Sanguan, we
have Anaki Sinha,
we have Manoya Mcindrathan
here we are and we have La Button and I
have Sahil here representing Lal Button
for us today along with Sunny who's
working um with La Button as well. So,
uh, this exceptional group of local
Bmpton creatives are delivering
world-class art experience into Bmpton
Parks for free. At the end of the
summer, we will wrap up the season with
a community celebration at Jacuzzi Park
on August 27th from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m.
And we would love to have you join us.
Next slide, please.
Bmpton Parkscapes program trains and
supports local artists, activates parks,
improves residents health and
well-being, strengthens neighborhood
pride, creates safer and more connected
public spaces, and gives meaningful
engagement opportunities for the public.
Residents tell us that these programs
introduce them to new art and helps them
feel seen, connected, and proud of where
they live. As we look ahead, we are
excited to explore how this program can
continue for years to come and how it
can be integrated into collaboration
with parks department and other city
teams into 2028. Thank you very much and
see you in our parks this summer.
>> Thank you very much for that
presentation. Stay there. Don't go
anywhere. We have speakers. Councelor
Maderos.
>> Thank you through you, Mr. Chair. Thank
you for uh the delegation. This is such
a great program. I really love the fact
that you're really uh um activating, I
guess, public spaces and bringing art uh
to the community. I guess my simple
question would be um is how can we help
you get the message out? I think you do
share it with our offices. So, we'll
sort of do that. You know, councelor
Keane and myself uh um especially with
some of the events at ours, we would
love to support it in any way. So maybe
um if uh we can sort of meet with uh
with BA and see how we can sort of
coordinate to ensure we can get the
community at least the awareness that
this is happening and for them to
understand how they can participate. Um
I really love the seniors focus as well.
Our parks I think in Bmpton uh we use
our public spaces and our parks uh
probably more than any other community
I've witnessed and they use it in
different ways and um it's fantastic to
introduce the the art aspect. So, I'm
really excited about it and councelor K
and myself uh really would love to sort
of meet offline and see how we can help
communicate and promote it to our
residents. So, thank you so much.
>> Wonderful. Thank you. Yes, we can
certainly do that.
>> Thank you. Next, I have councelor
Santos.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Always excited to
see more arts and arts programming
throughout the city of Bmpton. Um many
many many years ago before BAO was
formed it was AEDA and as one of the
founders uh founding board members of
the organizations in our strategic
planning session we talked about
integrating arts into every aspect of
infrastructure in the city of Bmpton.
And in fact during that time I also said
a challenge to the commissioners. How do
we take capital projects and integrate
arts into our buildings into our public
works and now we have the streets for
streams program and various other
aspects of arts being integrated but
this particular thing is exciting and
just a quick question so is this the
first time we're doing this the
parkscapes roots in the park
>> we did a small pilot last year and the
DT was a part of that this year I think
we've tripled the offerings we have four
artists last year we had two so the
program is growing and we'd love to see
it continue as well.
>> So, it was a success last time and now
it's expanding even more. And what I
love about this is it's not just about
murals. It's about other art forms and
integrating art in other different forms
into our parks and engaging the
community to better understand how
incredible our city is, particularly our
green spaces. So, congratulations. And I
echo councelor Maderos's sentiment and I
I would love to I always love to promote
and support um the different initiatives
from Bow and Arts in the city of Bmpton.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you very much councelor Santos,
Councelor Bar.
>> Thank you. Thank you through you, Mr.
Chair. I just want to say thank you so
much. Um I could recognize a lot of
artists here have been working with
especially with councelor Plesi and I
with our town halls whether it's um we
had little workshops but it's great to
see that coming into our parks. My
question is how can residents sign up?
How can they come get involved? Um I do
see a lot of the parks um there's one
two three four five sessions but how can
residents be involved? I think that's
the biggest thing um for residents to be
proud to be part of their parks.
Yes, we've just launched our
registration today. So, everything is
available through Eventbrite and we'll
send a note out to all of your teams as
well with registration. We have flyers
that are just being printed this week,
too. So, those can all go out and will
be distributed. We're working with the
cultural services team and experience
Bmpton to have flyers out at the farmers
market each week. Um, and each of these
artists are doing some of their own
engagement and push as well to local
organizations. So, we'll make sure you
get the information and folks can sign
up.
>> Excellent. Great work.
Thank you very much, councelor Bar. So I
have a motion moved by councelor Maderos
to receive the announcement. Is that
needed madam clerk? Not needed but
acceptable. Thank you. All in favor?
That carries. So we'll now move on.
Thank you so much. And we'll now move on
to our delegations. And we do have a
number of delegations today. First, we
have possible delegations regarding
notice of intention to amend the
business licensing and administrative
penalties bylaw in item 10.2.1. Madame
clerk, do we have any delegations?
>> Dear chair, we have no registered
delegations for that item.
>> Thank you very much. And seeing none
from the gallery, we'll move on to
delegation from Pashant Panda, Bmpton
resident, regarding the Embleton
Community Center development charges and
allocation.
Is Pashant here?
>> He may be. Yes, there he is.
Thank you for being here pashant to
speak about the tremendous Embleton
Community Center that residents are
anticipating.
>> Welcome.
>> Good morning chair and the member of
council. Thank you for giving me the
opportunity here. I did the um uh
delegation last month also and from that
meeting we got some more questions.
That's right. I'm here to ask for those
questions. add the full presentation but
I think only this uh slide has been
presented right now. I can go directly
to the questions or I can go through the
slides however you want.
>> Sure. So we have been fighting for
Embleton Community Center from 2018
onwards and based on that uh number of
times we have met the council and mayor
too for that purpose.
uh it was supposed to start we had the
groundbreaking ceremony in uh December
on December 9th 2025 and this is 6
months now nothing happened and when I
did the last delegation uh there was a
delay because of some permissions from
or agreement to be taken from the BC
saga of credit indigenous people and uh
because of the fund federal funding.
My question is um as I as you see on
this uh screen this project was started
in 2013 and I have seen 16.2 million was
pro uh allocated for this project um in
2013 and 14 and then after that there
was no activity until 2022.
There were number of times amounts were
put in the budget allocations were done
but nothing happened. What I noticed is
uh there was budget allocations also all
these years. I have a slide actually if
somebody wants to put that slide.
>> This is the only two three. This is the
slide we have. Okay. So, um
Okay. So, um based on the allocations I
was expecting it should have started
long back. It never started. So my
question is uh the the construction took
almost 13 years no activity. So whose
responsibility is it for the cost
increase of this project 2013 2026 still
not done. And the second question is uh
there was a you know when I got the DC
charges as part of the FOI freedom of
interest request. Uh I noticed the
number [clears throat] project number
got changed. So I thought that may be
the confusion part why the project
number two had changed. Maybe the amount
which was allocated in 2013 is no more
reflected in the new project because
it's a new number. Uh third question,
I'm seeing the surplus in the de um in
in the DC charges u for recreation
services. uh last year it was 179
previous year 187 and you know almost
almost uh every time it is more than 100
million but uh we haven't seen any
activity happening on the ground what
was the reason for that we have been
asking for expedition I don't think fund
is a problem
and as I said during May delegation I
was informed that project was delayed
due to approval requirements uh that is
specific for u federal funding we
already have fund from the city treasure
why don't we start right now and then
wait for that approval from the NGS
people later on as as it happens we can
always integrate that money into the
project and we understand from mayor
that there was no funding happened for
this project from the development
charges but when I did the FYI I see num
numbers against this project so what is
correct is the FYI correct or mayor
correct I wanted to understand that
problem thank you for me
>> thank you very much I have speakers.
Mayor Brown.
>> Yeah. Welcome back to uh city hall. I
know we've had a few meetings um um
about this, but just to let you know,
when I got elected mayor, there was no
plans, no funding, no resources for
this. If it wasn't for councelor BR,
counselor plesi funding for this, uh
there'd be no rec center. And now we
have the largest investment in city
history and recreation happening because
of their ex tremendous leadership. Um
there's stuff on this screen that's
simply um wrong. And I think just since
you're here in public, it's good to
always um correct the record. I see we
have our community I'm not sure who
could speak to this whether it would be
um community services um or public works
um
>> corporate
>> or corporate services um on on uh
development charges that are collected
um and um how the process uh flows. I
know we answered those questions before
under a previous delegation. Um but what
staff member wants to uh explain the the
process
>> I see Bill just a correction there.
We've been waiting for the accounts
department uh to get back to us for the
last month but nobody has yet. Uh that
the delegation last month was by Pashan.
>> Oh there's Mark. There's Mark Mundon.
That's the person I was looking for.
>> Thank you mayor. We'll ask staff to
address the questions. Thank you.
>> So Mark, first question. We went to um
uh a meeting in the a park a while ago
and they there was residents under the
impression that development charges were
already fully collected for this um and
we should have that money sitting in a
reserve account. We know that's not the
case. If you could explain that to the
residents.
>> Yeah. So thanks thanks mayor and through
the chairs the council. Um so we uh
report on our DC reserves on a quarterly
basis and I had a chance to see the
presentation you had and you had the uh
the revenue the spend and then what the
balance the missing piece there was the
commitments. So yes we do have a balance
as of we we presented our latest report
on June 3rd the Q1 2026 report and we
had uh in the recreation reserveund uh5
million I believe but there was also
$180 million of commitments beyond that.
So the reserve is negative by $180
million. So the city of Bmpton is
building in advance of receiving the
revenue to the tune of $180. So we have
not collected the funds yet. We're
building in advance assuming that the
the DCs will come in in the future. So
it is incorrect to say that we have
collected or we have all the money. We
don't. We're building in advance of
receiving the funding. And just to let
you know in the case of Embleton because
the province changed the rules on on
development charges and before it used
to be we we get them um at building
permit and now it's not till occupancy
and so this change means that to make
this project happen council had to take
the unusual step of borrowing money to
make this happen. So, we've borrowed
money to put a priority on this. Um,
which is unusual. Um, but we did it to
get this project moving. Um, but any
suggestion that this was approved and
funded in the past is factually
incorrect.
>> Do you have any additional questions or
Yeah. Yeah.
>> So, um, based on the presentation I have
given the slides and all it shows up
like it doesn't tell me the uh amount
already allocated under the reserve
fund. It only shows me opening balance
collected in this year and what is the
closing balance. I got the information
for 15 years from 2010 and that's why I
found out
>> those are that's not for Embleton.
>> Um and for Embleton we've had to borrow.
>> Yeah. But in 2013 there is a entry of
Embleton Community Center in the uh
reserve fund specifically collected
money for I mean spent for Emblem
Community Center.
>> So Mark you want to explain that please
Mark
>> the planning grant. Yeah. Uh so uh
through the chair um in 2013 there was a
project set up to purchase land. So land
typically h uh begins many years in
advance of the project. So in 2013 we
initiated a project to purchase the land
that was done in 2015. Once the land is
pro is purchased the project is closed
that project. So the new project number
is the design and then the construction
which started in 2022.
>> Yeah. And so the purchase of land is
separate than the actual funds you need
to build what is the the you know the
greatest recreation investment in a
facility in the city.
>> Thank you Mayor Brown. Any further? No
councelor Plush.
>> Um thank you um Mr. Chair and thank you
very much for your delegations. Um we
have been working on this for for quite
a long time. Um I like you was under the
impression that uh that monies were
allocated. Um and I've asked the
question previously so I am a little bit
confused as you are here today. Um I
certainly knew that uh the land purchase
um back uh back uh in 200 I thought it
was 14 but uh Mark corrected us it's 15.
Um I always connect those two together
though. So, like if I'm um you know
about to build a house, then I take my
land cost and then my house and and so I
I would consider that to be um the same
thing here at the city. Obviously, we
don't uh we it's separated a little bit.
So, I can see where the confusion is.
From my understanding, you've uh you've
put in a FOI request. um you have some
information on that request um that you
wanted to uh present here today. Um but
we have a little bit of an issue with
that because it went through freedom of
information. My question through you,
Mr. Chair, to staff is if somebody from
the press grabs an FOI and don't they
publicize
that
>> information? So then why can't somebody
come before us and and publicize it? Is
it the fact that
there you know see if you can answer
that question to your chair to councelor
Plesi? Uh we could publish the
information and share it on screen if it
was the corporate records that were
given through the FOI process but it's
not the corporate records. It's um um
information or charts created from bits
and pieces of the records that were
given.
>> Okay.
>> So, it's
>> Are you saying that the delegation's
presentation has inaccuracies?
>> No, we can share it as long as it's not
presented as corporate records.
>> Is that would you like to see?
>> No, I don't understand.
it's it's presented and included
given the impression that it's a
corporate record received through an
FOI. There's good information in it. I
think the numbers came from FOI
information.
>> Okay.
>> But they these are not the corporate
records.
>> Okay. So maybe what we could do then in
um I know that it's not the clerk's
responsibility to do this but for this
um instance maybe we can have a look at
what that pres presentation is separate
what is the corporate uh corporate side
of things and and maybe rejig it so that
when it comes to council next week we
can actually have the full picture of of
what is accurate
>> and and that's what we can do uh Mr.
Pashant, we can work with you to create
the presentation that removes that
impression that it's a corporate record
and and is clear that it's your
information.
>> Sure. Thank you.
>> With corporate numbers.
>> Yeah. When I did the FYI, I thought it's
a corporate information. I didn't
thought it is bits and pieces. I
requested a proper information like you
know revenue collected, how much is
spent against each project and how much
is the balance. This was my query
question and then based on that what I
got I thought it's a corporate
information. I did not see the
difference between
>> and thank you pashan and I think I have
the some of this uh same questions um
and you know going back I need to go
back now and see cuz I've asked the
questions and I think my responses that
I've received in my head are a little
bit different so I need to make sure
that I'm I'm accurate I'm correct in in
asking the questions that I already know
the answers to. Um sorry final thing for
gentleman you know because he said there
was already allocated money against the
each item in the DC. I wanted to ask we
have allocated funds in the budget every
year starting 20 2018 2018 was 4 million
2020 n 2019 it was uh hundreds of
millions and then all the years if you
see my presentation there is a slide for
>> you know where allocated from from where
to where
>> so my understanding is that amount it
shows in the DC um uh FOI requested for
or in the budget budget documents on the
city website it says it's allocated from
DC. I I have sent the link also in that
presentation.
>> Okay. We'll ask Mark to come back up and
and provide an explanation.
>> Yeah. Uh thank you for the question. So
we have full records of all of the
budget approvals and and we can share
that with you. Unfortunately, we've been
trying to connect, but we had the wrong
email address. So we're happy to meet
and go through and show like all there's
nothing like we have all of the records
of what we've approved for Embleton when
it was approved. So we're happy to share
all that and when the each approval has
the funding source clearly indicated is
largely I believe 95% funded by uh
development charges. So in all of those
instances when we're approving those
budgets whatever year it's happening
we're allocating development charges
that we don't have that we're going to
get in the future um to pay for that
project.
>> Okay. So I'm glad that I see that
there's been a conversation. Um, it's
funny how often I hear that uh there's
an inaccurate uh email address, but
maybe if we can send your information to
our office and we'll get it to finance
uh office and then they'll send it and
that way there's no
>> No, I I yesterday evening and I have
their email. So,
>> thank you. Yesterday evening somebody
reached out to me. So, I'm in contact
with them. Help me out with connecting.
>> Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Thank
you, Mr. Chair. Thank you, Council
Plesie. Mayor Brown,
>> I just I forgot to mention if you see
the last point there um about the
indigenous consultation
um that's a requirement for the federal
funding. Um and I believe that meeting
just happen. I'm looking over to
Commissioner Boyce or um to Peter. Did
that meeting actually happen under the
>> through the chair of the mayor uh staff
have met uh with the indigenous
community this week? that uh
consultation process has has commenced
and uh we're looking forward to starting
construction once that once that process
is completed.
>> Okay. So, is it fair to say now that
that process is essentially complete,
[snorts] we'll be looking at
construction in the summer?
>> Through the chair to uh to the mayor, um
that's correct. We anticipate
construction starting um u by August or
September at the latest. uh the sooner
uh we can start we will uh once that
once that process is completed.
>> Okay. I also want to thank Jenny because
um you know we we mentioned that with
the provincial change there's we don't
have development charges until occupancy
and so the city had to go and borrow all
this money to prioritize this project.
Um um that's not our wish. It was a
provincial change. Um, and because
there's there wasn't funds for this, um,
you know, we had to not only borrow, but
lobby. I went to Ottawa to meet with the
prime minister and try to get them to be
part of this project. But a tool took a
delegation to see Sonia Sadu. Um, and a
tool you're getting the residents to
really say this is their priority made a
difference because then Sonia pestered
the prime minister as well and the
minister. So, I just want to say thank
you um because I think what you did um
got us federal support. Um so, thank you
AUL for stepping up.
>> Yeah, thank you.
>> Thank you, Mayor Brown, Councelor Bar.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you through you, uh Mr. Chair. And
on a good note, um just want to say
thank you for coming here. I know um
sometimes residents can be confused and
with the numbers just with transparency
and I think it's important for you guys
to come here to ask those questions but
also happy that Mark has been our
finance expert right behind you has been
connecting with you. So hopefully um
after this maybe if you have more
questions please um reach out to him and
we want to make sure that you're getting
all the answers that you need for
Embleton and looking at uh Peter that we
do have um Embleton will be coming this
summer. So we're excited councelor Plesi
and I um to see the construction start.
That's it. Thank you.
>> Thank you very much councelor Bar. So
I'll ask you councelor bar to move
motion of receipt of the delegation. All
in favor? That carries. And next we now
move on to 6.3 delegations with regards
to various enforcement related concerns.
And our first is from Michelle Goautier.
Michelle, please welcome. You have five
minutes.
Welcome.
So, good morning council. Good morning,
chair. Good morning, Mayor Brown. As uh
you mentioned, my name is Michelle. And
by the way, thank you for pronouncing it
correctly. It's very rare in Ontario
with a French name. Um I'm familiar to
you. I've been at the council before. Um
as are many of the people that are here
today to delegate. Um we're not friends.
We didn't meet in a social occasion. We
met in avenues like this um delegating.
We have been at town halls together. Uh
and over the years um we've formed
relationships um and proud to be here
today. Uh my husband likes to call me
his little troublemaker um lovingly and
I always try and remind him it's not
troublemaking it's stepping forward and
advocating for the community. It shows a
passion for the people around us. Um and
I think it's very important thing to do.
The problem isn't stepping forward and
speaking. The problem is usually the
reasons why a whole group of citizens
choose to come together um and stand in
front of council to talk about things
that are happening in their community,
which is what brings me here today. Um
I'm here to delegate about noise. And
I'd like to start off by playing you one
of the hundreds hundreds of videos that
I have of my neighbors across the
street.
>> [screaming]
>> So as I mentioned mentioned hundreds.
Um, our odyssey started in October of 23
when new tenants moved in in the house
across the street. Tenant owned a Dodge
Charger, modified muffler, and we have
gotten no piece since then. Tenants have
changed. Problems still persists. Not
this Dodge Charger, another Dodge
Charger, or another modified muffler.
Um, we did what the city expected us to
do. We went across the street and tried
to deal with the tenant directly without
success. And then I started to follow
the processes that the city has put in
place. And that's where the system
failed me. I put together two noise logs
and sent them in. No response. I
escalated. No response. I put in 30
three
reports with the police. No response.
The community policing officer. No
response. So, um, I guess I did what
most people would do. I sat down with my
husband and talked about moving out of
Bmpton. We chose to stay because it's
our home and we own it and we renovated
it and we will go when it's good for our
family and not because somebody forced
us out. Um, we then ended up putting
$20,000 worth of our own money into our
home to insulate um the noise. Uh,
triple pane windows. We rip down walls
and put in noise insulation. Um, and
that's the only reason that we've been
able to stay and keep our minds. Um, I
escalated it to Laura Johnston in
January of 2025. No response. I
escalated to Robert Higgs. He told me
politely it wasn't his problem and that
I should quote, "Go find the noise hound
in the local police force." Whatever
that is. Most people would give up. We
have not. Um we believe that there's an
opportunity to use this with enforcement
um not through um attrition. Um I
eventually did get help because we have
an excellent counselor counselor Katon
who took an interest and I'm very
grateful to him that solved a couple of
the car problems but not all of them
over two and a half years. We also have
an excellent person in enforcement. His
name is Grit Des and I am so grateful
for him. He has also helped. However,
this is luck. this isn't process and
that's the problem. The reality is the
city is not equipped to deal with noise
pollution especially chronic and
especially on private property. Um so
here's my ask of this council. One, get
a better process. Get one that works and
get one that can be scaled across the
city. Please communicate that working
process to everybody in the community so
that people can get help.
Fix the gaps between police and bylaw.
Residents should not be turned from
police to bylaw, bylaw, police. It's not
my problem. It's not my job. It's not my
problem. And please involve residents
like myself who live with this problem
every day. I have a lot to offer. Um I
would like to be collaborative with the
city. I would really like to help. Um
ask and I'm happy to. Thank you very
much.
>> Thank you very much, Michelle. I do have
speakers. Councelor Keenan.
Thank you. And through you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Michelle, for coming in. Um,
it's a it's a it's a joy to have you
because you you never give up, which uh
which I love because it's residents like
you that makes our community better.
>> Thank you.
>> Um, and I you know, some of the stuff
you said today is probably the first
time I've I've heard it, even though
we're in quite uh contact quite
frequently. Um, and I know we've taken
measures. We've came out with bylaw with
PE regional police knocked on the door
ourselves um, to try to resolve this
issue.
>> I appreciate that. Thank you.
>> Um, but we talk about the process and
the lack of process from the city of
city of Bmpton or what that process is.
Um, do you have anything that you could
tell us today that may help more? Do you
feel that that is a group getting
together with bylaw to create a new
process? Is that what the ask is? I
would I would invite the council to
consider that what's currently in place
is not working. And I think I'm a great
example of that. And I would invite the
council to consider getting together
police um who have a hand to play in
this um bylaw who have a hand to play in
this and residents like myself and put
together a working council to just talk
through what are these issues, where do
we find them and what's the best,
easiest, and more importantly scalable
solution um given the current resources
that the city has.
>> Yeah. Um and I know there there's things
happening. Councilor Maduros and I
obviously have had a lot of
conversations around this. Um I know
that the mayor is currently working on
re reutilizing um our cameras for
purpose of giving out tickets to noisy
mufflers. Um I I hope that that will um
come in sooner than later so that I
think that will make a definite impact.
Um I know that council myself councilor
maduros and myself would be happy to set
that up and start to see if there's a a
different process that could be put in
place to um help mitigate these issues.
I'm sorry that you're going through it
for such a long time, but um you know,
we'll keep trying to do what we can and
and I think this is a good step forward.
So, thank you so much for your
delegation.
>> I appreciate it. Thank you.
>> Thank you very much, Councelor Keenan. I
have other speakers. Deputy Mayor,
>> thank you. And I just want to thank you
actually for delegating. I'm dealing
with the exact same problem uh in my
area. And I understand the confusion
because I am also I I I get the
confusion between the police where the
handoff is and bylaw for the noise
complaints. I totally understand that.
So, I'm happy you highlighted this. Um
there's there's street that comes to
mind and um I think this something we'll
roll up our sleeves and work on. Thank
you so much.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you, Councelor Santos.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thanks for coming
in to to delegate on this. Um, I've
received as well issues in in wards one
and five related to noise and usually
they [snorts] are um linked to rental
properties.
>> Yes.
>> Yes. And so my question to you is in
addition to some of the noise issues
related to this property, are there
other issues related to this property? I
know that noise is the big one and and
in my wards I've been able to deal with
a lot of noise issues as well with
residents like yourself working together
with you. Um but are there other issues
related to that particular problem?
>> 100%. I'm just um keeping my delegation
to one topic but yes there's
>> many many many issues with this
property.
>> Great. And so what I'll say is because I
know there are a number of other
delegations coming up, what we're
finding and certainly in in WS one and
five working with many residents on
similar issues is that we seem to have
chronic repeat offenders
>> and problematic properties. Um and I
think when we go through the delegation
and I will ask at the end of the
delegations to actually move the report
that's associated with all these
delegations forward so we could talk
about it a little bit more. Um there are
other uh jurisdictions
particularly in Edmonton where I've
recently been and and looked at their
model of how to deal with problematic
properties that I'm hopeful that
together with council and the residents
we're going to be able to find better
solutions that are far more proactive um
particularly as it relates to noise as
well.
>> I'm so grateful for your interest in
this. I would just like to point out
noise is a bit different than some of
the other problems that we talk about.
So, for example, I can call bylaw and
the grass is still going to be growing
um you know, a week from now when they
show up. But if I call bylaw because
someone started up a car and they have a
modified muffler, it's gone within a
minute. And so, it's a little bit
qualitatively different and I think we
can lump everything in together and we
probably should, but I think this
particular issue needs um a little bit
different lens to look at it and
address.
>> Thanks so much.
>> Thank you.
Councelor Plushy.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, thank you for
your delegation. Um, I I think I missed
how long you've been dealing with this
one individual. Can you repeat how long
when did it all start?
>> So, it's it started in October of 2023
when our neighbor an Eva unfortunately
passed away. Uh, who had been a
long-term resident 60 years. Um, and
then we had a moving a moving in of
essentially a rooming house. It's been
going on for 2 and a half years. Um,
this particular individual that you
heard on the video of hundreds, that was
just one tenant of many. So, like all
rooming houses, it's a continuous
revolving door of new tenants. Um, and
so we've been really unlucky, you know,
knock on wood. Um, every time we've
gotten new tenants, there's at least one
in the batch that has a modified
muffler. Um it it it's it's
disheartening. Um you know, we all deal
with it. Uh now you have a resident that
has been trying to work with the
counselors and you and you speak very
highly of them. Um but
>> you're now here before uh committee
before council essentially uh pleading
>> for for some support and some help. And
and that's the issue that I think all of
us uh if we if we should have we do have
um and it comes down to you know what
are we going to do about it we deal with
this all the time. Yeah,
>> we are constantly on the phone to see
what we can do in certain areas, the
problem areas because of one individual
and it's, you know, it's up to us to
make sure that
something some kind of enforcement, some
kind of efforts are are helping you
continue to live, you know, the life
that that you certainly uh deserve. Um,
and when it, so when it comes down to
this, you've taken your time of your day
to come before council, I would only say
to you, LED services, park a bylaw
officer in front of the house and just
park it there. And I'm sure you have the
times. I'm sure there's there's times of
days where it's like every day at this
time, you're 90% sure you're going to
hear this car. Let's get the officers
[clears throat] there.
>> So, if I may.
>> Sure. Um, Gerprit again [clears throat]
whom I'm so grateful for. Um, he and I
worked out his idea, a system which
managed three cars of the many that were
issues. The system is that he needs a
clear video of the license plate.
>> He needs a clear v video showing the
noise such that they can determine that
the noise is excessive.
>> Um, and a witness statement signed by
myself and someone else.
Great. It works. So
>> when sorry when was this?
>> Oh over two and a half years. I think
this was probably a year in that we came
to this demi solution.
>> Okay.
>> And it worked again for three instances.
Um so the idea is escalate the fines in
order to address and eventually the
person will
fix it.
>> Right?
>> That's it's great. It does it does work.
It's not scalable across the city. And
quite frankly,
>> it doesn't have to be. It
>> It doesn't have to be.
>> It's not across the city. It's We can
pick maybe five, six areas in our in our
boundaries bigger than all of theirs and
we represent more than more more people
than they do. So, five or six areas that
we know of that we could say and point
to, we need something here. We need help
and we need support. So, it's not like
it's right across the city. It's these
specific areas. I'm able-bodied
in good health
50-some year old cough cough. Um,
imagine if it was an 85year-old lady.
>> Absolutely.
>> She's not going to stand out in the
middle of the street in full view of her
neighbor with her video camera. So,
that's where it breaks down.
>> I'll be asking you to I hope
>> that's the solution that's currently in
existence. That's worked for me, but
it's not really a solution. I think we
are agreeing. I think we need something
a little better. Yeah.
>> Um and again scalable and useful for
able-bodied, non-able-bodied,
whatever age
>> that can address the concerns. I don't
know what that is. I'm not coming with a
solution. I'm just saying we should
probably sit down and talk about it and
see if we can figure something out that
works.
>> Yeah. Fair.
>> I like the idea and I think we've we've
sure talked about it a lot. Um I think
we have ideas and we have we just need
to now implement more so than we already
have
>> and especially on you know and then you
go back to you know 311 which I I I
don't that's different conversation and
don't want to really get into that right
now but
>> I'll finish by just uh saying sorry how
what you're going through.
>> Thank you
>> and um we'll see what we can do and
thank you for your delegation.
>> Appreciate it. Thank you so much.
Thank you very much, councelor. Next,
councelor Keenan.
>> So, my plan was to refer this to staff,
but I see two other speakers.
>> So, I I'll stand down and let the two
other speakers go before I refer to
staff.
>> Thank you, Michelle. I'll ask for your
indulgence a little bit further. I have
councelor Bar.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair, and just want to
say thank you for coming in. Again, just
like councelor Plushie was saying, we do
have areas in in our area, especially in
WS 2 and six like stonegate um where we
are having these issues. So, um again, I
don't know if council we have talked
about this, but these loud mufflers,
they're getting installed by these body
shops and is that controlled by the
provincial government where we can amend
maybe advocate for to get something
done? I'm not sure if this is a question
for staff where
I I'm just kind of thinking on the top
of my head, but it is something that we
have to um kind of get at the root
cause. Where are these uh individuals
getting these loud mufflers from and
aren't are they getting penalized and
getting the root cause? Making sure that
we're handling at that point. Um not
sure if
any staff would be able to answer that
question. If it's
>> I'll ask staff to respond
three you Mr. Chair. Um obviously um
you're correct there's some
jurisdictional uh issues at play but
certainly we can take that back and and
uh look into it um further. [snorts]
uh we obviously have pretty clear lines
about um uh what we can do and what we
can't do, but there there might be
something there to to support this.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. And just um
looking at there's a lot of younger kids
that are having these loud mufflers and
maybe if they're able to go to these
body shops, maybe think they think it's
normal. um we do have to make sure that
we're getting toughen on on our body
shops to make sure that um if you if you
do install a loud muffler um you will be
penalized. So I think though that's
where it kind of starts but um this is
something I know council did talk
council members have talked about this
but I think this is something that we
definitely need to advocate. Thank you
to you Mr. Chair.
>> Thank you councelor Bark councelor
Power.
>> Thank you Mr. Chair. Um, thank you very
much for your delegation. We get a lot
of complaints about loud muffers along
Bov. Um, all the houses that back onto
Bvard, it's a complaint non-stop and we
know it. Um, might I suggest as part of
the referral from councelor Keenan that
maybe we look at a citizens appointment
committee specifically surrounding
bylaws and we can add that either this
term or next term of council.
Thank you.
Thank you very much, councelor Power.
Last word to Sorry, I'll go to councelor
Fertini first.
>> Yeah, thank you. Thank you, Michelle.
So, I have a vehicle around the corner
for me. The same thing, but the it's not
only the body shops that puts these
mufflers. It's manufactured and yet the
new Corvette comes out, has a muffler,
the Wildcat, Chrysler, the Mustang.
So, how could we actually say don't push
the gas or don't do it when they're
already manufactured by the man the like
Ford and Chrysler a lot of them and the
guy around the corner from me has a
wildcat and he says I just touch the gas
it makes a noise and I'm not and he's
driving slow so we also have to look at
these manufacturers say you know if we
have these bylaws and people revving
these mufflers how could we do that like
and I live not too far from Queen Street
about a kilometer and at night I hear
them all the time because when it
everything's calm, you know, and I feel
bad like you have to go spend all that
money. I have put new windows and I
still hear it. You know, I'm not going
to start breaking walls down. So, you
know, we can only do what we can and I
know bylaw you have to catch him in the
act. That's the hard part. It's very
hard. And when you do knock on the door,
it's not easy when the guy looks at you
and says, "Well, I just bought the car.
I spent, you know, 250,000 on this
Corvette." And it comes like that. What
do you want me to do? Um,
>> but revving at like you got there just
sitting there revving, revving, revving,
you know, and it's the same thing where
my one of my cousins got the the
motorcycle across the street. He starts
at 5:00 in the morning. That's how they
are when he goes to work. So,
>> I feel like the council deals with
difficult and challenging issues every
day.
>> Um, and yet we find a path forward and
so the important thing is to start
talking about it
>> um and try to find a way to address it.
>> Yeah, it's true. And this is happens on
everything like you know you're not
allowed to have fire in your backyard
but they sell the fire pits. You're not
allowed to have this but they sell it.
So thank you.
>> Thank you councelor Patini. And uh
before I go to councelor Keenan. Thank
you Michelle. I I think you've literally
struck something here today. So I'll ask
councelor Keenan to announce for us the
referral motion. Santos.
>> Councilor Sanchos before councelor
Keenan.
>> Thank you Mr. Chair. Just one final
thing because um councelor Bar and
others had brought uh something up
regarding our noise bylaws. So in April
of 2023, we did pass a motion about uh
enhancing the noise bylaws to deal
specifically with noisy mufflers. I
brought that forward in April 2023. We
all supported it. So the bylaws have
been strengthened and there is also
reference to auto body shops that modify
mufflers. So I think what we need to do
in the referral back to staff from this
delegation is look at the those updated
bylaws and how we are indeed enforcing
it and what the the best way is and for
example in WS one and five I always work
with residents to collect evidence like
the same way that you're doing and
determining what the better path forward
is. um particularly with police because
with police they have project erase and
project noise maker as well in the
entire month of May. And so how do we um
integrate all of that including the
enhanced bylaws and be more effective um
at addressing the the noise concerns
that you're facing Michelle?
>> Thank you. And Deputy Mayor Singh
speaking to the motion which is about to
be tabled.
>> Yeah. Just one last thing because we've
been talking about Sorry. Uh yes, one
last thing. So, because we've been
talking about vehicles, um I also, if uh
the mover of the motion is okay with it,
would like um the little mopeds and also
to be included because those are I don't
know if you've had experience in your
neighborhood, but in our neighborhood uh
neighborhoods uh in WS 9 and 10, uh this
is a big pet peeve and they've also
modified their mufflers as well in the
parks and uh yeah, they're terrorizing
the community. So, if that could also be
included. Thank you so much. Thank you,
Deputy Mayor, and to Councelor Keenan.
>> Thank you, uh, Mr. Chair, and through
you. Thank you, council colleagues for,
um, all your input. Um, we've
[clears throat] heard a lot of great
suggestions. Um, back to, you know, just
to council bar suggestion, not just on
the advocacy. U, we look back to when we
banned fireworks, we didn't just ban the
firework use, we banned the sale. Um, so
I think part of this would be looking at
our bylaws um to look at how we can
enforce um the sale of illegal mufflers
because if they put it over a certain
decel, it becomes illegal. Um so uh
that'll be part of um this round table
that I'm about to try to put together.
Um so what I would like to do here
um and I like um what councelor P is
saying about uh a committee for bylaws
in general. I believe if we go through
that process on being a part of the
citizens appointment committee the
process is going to take a while. I
think a round table will get us working
quicker with staff and residents in
order to try to find solutions to these
problems immediately. But I think it's a
great idea for the next term of council.
Um, so if I don't know if we can capture
that now or wait for the next term of
council um and and see what the appetite
is then for um the elected officials
that will be here. Um so what I would
like to do is refer this back to staff
to create a round table with staff and
willing counselors that want to be part
of the round table along with residents
who are willing to take part to see how
we can strengthen our bylaws and come up
with a new solution to deal with this. I
do feel um and I'll include that for all
muffler types for all vehicles. Um and I
I I really strongly feel that it's
always going to be multiple things that
solve a problem. It's never going to be
one solution that's going to solve this
problem that we've had for many years.
So I believe uh the advocacy that's
happening on Mayor Brown's part for the
cameras, that's going to solve it a lot
on our major streets like Bvard. Um how
do we solve it in our communities, you
know, right in front of our doors like
you've been dealing with for two and a
half years? I think it's by doing what
we're about to try to do. Um because
obviously we try to do something through
councelor Santos in 2023 which hasn't
had that much effect which is sad to
hear but um you know this is definitely
a council that's not going to just throw
one idea out. If it doesn't work say hey
we tried we're going to try something
else. So I'm going to refer this back to
staff to set up a round table um and uh
hopefully we can finally get a solution.
>> Good old fashioned task force.
>> Yeah.
>> Thank you very much. I see nodding all
across the front desk. So we have a
motion moved by councelor Keenan to uh
have the round table and to receive the
delegation from Miss Michelle Goautier.
All in favor that carries. Thank you
very much.
>> And thank you. And with that we will now
ask for Linda Lewis Bmpton resident to
come forward to speak to us in regards
to garbage and littering concerns.
Thank you for being here, Linda.
Welcome. Thank you. Thank you. And good
morning to our council members and our
mayor. Um I'm here today to address an
issue that has become increasingly worse
over the last couple of years. And I'm
concerned it's going to get worse due to
the complete lack of consequences not
being imposed on the offenders.
When I leave my home for a walk, and I
do this quite often, usually four or
five times a week, um I see piles of
household garbage, broken furniture,
discarded filthy mattresses, ripped open
garbage bags, and other waste left at
the curb or scattered across private
properties. When I visit friends, run
errands, or travel through other
neighborhoods, I see the same thing. The
question many residents are asking is
simple. What has happened to our city?
These piles of garbage are more than
just an eyesore. They create legitimate
health and safety concerns. We all know
Bmpton continues to struggle with the
rodent infestations and garbage left
sitting for days or even weeks provide
exactly the conditions that attract rats
and other pests. And I've seen a lot of
them lately. Um my grandson was out the
other day and he was vaping and he said
there's five of them all in a row. Five
raccoons. He says, "I I maybe I" I said,
"Well, maybe they're a family." So, we
just kind of looked and we laughed. Um,
residents don't seem to care whether the
garbage is technically on the boulevard,
at the curb, or a few feet inside the
property line. What they see is garbage
that originated from a specific
property, and it's negatively affecting
the surrounding neighborhood. Far too
often, offenders receive repeat warnings
and repeat education and ongoing chances
while neighboring residents continue to
deal with the consequences. And there's
a lot of consequences in throughout the
whole neighborhood. When I go walking,
it's incredible the amount of garbage.
Like I expected I I waited. Wintertime
comes, you know, there's garbage. People
throw things all over the place. It's
fine, right? But it never seems to get
cleaned up. [sighs]
In situations where remediation efforts
may be required, such as refuse
violations, repeat violations will be
addressed with an immediate penalty
notice in addition to this and issuance
of an order to comply. Sorry, I
[clears throat] missed one whole thing.
I'm so sorry. Warnings and education are
not enforcement. Ticketing is
enforcement. I am asking council to
direct staff in enforcement to do what
was represented in SOP update in
February 19th, 2025. On page three of
the updated SOPs, it clearly states with
regards to repeat violation locations,
in situations where remediation efforts
may be required, such as refuse
violations, repeat violations will be
addressed with an immediate penalty
notice in addition to the issuance of an
order to comply. A further penalty
notice will be issued if the conditions
of the order to comply are not met and
remediation efforts will be undertaken.
costs associated with a remediation
efforts will be attached to the property
in a tax role. The problem is not the
absence of rules. The problem continues
to be the absent of enforcement.
Taxpayers bear the cost of repeatedly
cleaning up after individuals who
knowingly ignore the city's bylaws.
Bmpton residents deserve clean, safe,
and well-maintained neighborhoods. They
deserve to know that when violations are
reported, meaningful action will be
taken. I urge council to hold
enforcement leadership accountability
for the updated SOPs and ask why the
updated SOPs from over a year ago have
not been applied to ensure that
offenders face meaningful consequences
and thank you so much for your time. I
appreciate it.
>> Thank you, Linda. And I do have
speakers, so please sit tight.
>> I have councelor Keenan.
Thank you and through you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you so much for your delegation.
Um, I can't tell you how many complaints
we get about garbage, but myself and
councilor maduros definitely get a lot
about repeat offenders.
>> Yeah.
>> Um, and it's it's extremely frustrating.
Um, you know, we've
>> so from from our stance points as Heroes
Council, we we know that there's a um a
policy that's been put in place that is,
you know, escalated fines for repeat
offenders, but the complaints that we're
getting to our offices is about repeat
offenders not being ticketed and being
given multiple chances.
>> Um, do you feel that a proactive
approach might solve that or do you
think it's an educational thing
yourself? I I think a proactive what I'm
seeing are the same people that do it
over it's it's the same as the three
feet grass and the whole nine yards.
It's the same group of people in rooming
houses usually a lot of the time where
I'll see garbage that's stacked up and
pouring out of their bins which of
course if you have a a windy day it's
it's going to fly all over the place.
There's no doubt about it because the
lid is up and it's it's sitting there.
So, a proactive approach, right? Maybe
education can help with that, but I'm
not sure that um when you've got like
seven, eight, nine people living in a
house that they're all going to do the
same thing. And that's probably part of
the problem. But to see the garbage,
it's just And it's been going on for
about two and a half years. I've never
seen it this bad. Never.
>> Yeah. Because it's it's our
understanding here as council that we
have a zero tolerance policy for read
offend repeat offenders.
>> Agree. we definitely hope is being
followed by um bylaw at the appropriate
time. I'll also send your delegation to
bylaw um to um maybe ask for some
additional metrics on u repeat offenders
specifically and an approach on how we
can deal with um repeat offenders a
little bit more than we currently are
because this is obviously
>> you guys can make so much money to help
compensate for that as well because I
mean at the end of the day I can
remember probably about 5 years ago I
had a neighbor that that actually had a
compliance she had to cut her grass and
she had so much time to do it in or she
was going to be fined and that was it.
But she at least got a warning for it,
right? And the whole nine yards. I don't
know how it works today. I know there
are fines that are justified for that
type of thing, but I mean, as I said, if
it's a one-time thing, it's fine. This
is a repeated offense,
>> of course. Yeah. So, and I know um
councelor Santos has definitely been
working very hard on this herself um and
you know brought back some great
information to me from uh FCM which I'm
hoping she'll share here today but it's
definitely um her championing that side
of things. So, I'll leave that for her.
Um but thank you so much for your
delegation. Really appreciate it.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you councelor Kenan. Councelor
Santos.
>> Thank you so much. Um and and please
stay thank you for your delegation in in
wards one and five. I've been dealing
with very similar issues as well and
>> where I'm from.
>> Yeah. Well, we I hear you. But we're,
you know, we're all being piloted with
the RRL alto together. And the good news
is that there has been some improvements
in some neighborhoods with those who are
becoming more compliant. The biggest
challenge for us are exactly what you
described, what we're talking about now,
what Michelle just described are the
repeat chronic offenders. And what's
interesting is that they in many cases
because I ask bylaw, did we ticket them?
They say yes. Did they pay the fine?
They say yes. Did they pine pay the fine
again? They say yes. So the challenge is
is that the cost of doing business to
these landlords is just to operate as a
slum landlord because they just consider
it the cost of doing business. And so
what we need to do is figure out a way
and track which I which we're we're
going to be moving in that direction now
because we've been able to weed out the
worst of the worst and now we just need
to deal with the worst of the worst in a
very proactive way. And we need to make
it so that the cost of doing business as
a slum landlord
no longer is of benefit to them.
>> And what's interesting and thank you
councelor Keening for bringing up FCM.
And I'm going to ask you questions
because this is what I brought back from
FCM. Edmonton. And Edmonton, by the way,
is in a worse off position than Bmpton
cuz I did a bus tour of all the slum
properties across Edmonton and how
they're dealing with them. That's what I
did at of at of SAM finding solutions to
this problem as well. And um uh what
they did is they created an initiative
called the problem property initiative.
And it's an entire team of people who
are dealing with chronic repeat
offenders. And I'll ask you a couple of
questions. So this is what's considered
a problem property.
>> Sure.
>> A problem property is a history of
repeated or excessive neglect,
disrepair, or safety concerns. Yes or
no? Is that something you've been
dealing with? Yes.
>> With a history of deliberate violations
andor non-compliance by property owners
or tenants.
>> Sorry. with a history of deliberate
violations and/or non-compliance by
property owners or tenants.
>> Yep.
>> Absolutely.
>> That pose a significant public risk or
fire risk.
>> Mhm.
>> That are abandoned and unsecured and may
be accessible to the public. That
doesn't imply in this case.
>> No.
>> Okay. Where ongoing criminal activities
may be taking place.
>> Uh yeah. Yeah. that require coordinated
response from several enforcement and/or
social support agencies.
>> Yeah. So, Edmonton,
God bless, has come up with a very
interesting initiative dealing
specifically with chronic repeat
offenders.
And when I asked the deputy fire chief,
who was the talking head for the entire
program, how do you determine what a
problematic property? It's not just this
list. He said to me, "If the property
requires more than one department to
address the issue, if it requires
building, if it requires bylaw and
repeat offenses from bylaw, if it
requires fire, if it requires different
departments, it's a problem property."
Why? Because it's sucking up all the
resources at the city in order to deal
repeatedly on that property.
>> That's right. So, I'm excited because
when we bring that report forward and
I've already took talked to staff as
well as my council members here, um we
will be looking at that Edmonton model.
We will be setting up meetings with them
after my visit with them and talking to
their various departments. Um and we'll
look at how we could implement some of
these things in the city of Bmpton. In
fact, and and I know there are other
delegations coming up as well, but this
is just a a prelude.
They even have a subclass property tax
rate whereby if you are identified as a
serious problem property, they actually
increase your property tax bill by 3%.
>> Hey, that's a great idea.
>> Because suddenly, if you do that, the
cost of doing business as a slum
landlord no longer makes sense
financially. And because of that, they
have cleared out some of they've
demolished some of their problem
properties and the landlord finally has
built a new like multiplex beautiful
units. And so that's a success story
that I'm hoping in some ways we may be
able to take a look at here in Bmpton.
Mind you, in Alberta, their tax laws are
different than Ontario. Um, so the on
Ontario government would have to give us
permission to create something like that
which will also require your advocacy at
the provincial level. Does that sound
like a plan?
>> Sounds like a plan.
>> Awesome. Thank you for your delegation.
>> You're welcome.
>> Thank you very much, Councelor Santos,
for your traveled experience and working
with FCM. Very valuable information.
Yes.
>> Thank you so much. Next, I have
councelor Power.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Thank you for your
delegation. Um,
education is a big issue that we have
and and I think when I look back, I do
walking tours with residents in some of
the problem neighborhoods and I'll go
and knock on doors and when you're
talking about rooming houses or what
have you, you see garbage buckets out in
the front or furniture out in the front.
Um, it's not segmented. So they don't
understand the difference between
recycling waste and then ref or compost
and you see the and so our garbage
collection doesn't get picked up and
then it sits there for weeks on end
because it's not being picked up. Then
you get the rodents then you get the
other issues that come up and it's just
unsightly. Um so I think as part of that
round table that um councelor Keenan was
talking about um we need to look at ways
that we not only get out to like when I
go door to door and I'll go with the
residents and they'll point out that I
mean they don't have to point out the
houses we know which ones they are but
um I'll go up to the door and I have um
a bylaw information packet and I also
have a garbage information packet that I
will give to the residents of the home
whether they be renters or homeowners.
And believe me, there are some
homeowners that have the same issues.
Um,
>> but um even like as far as last week, I
I was uh in one neighborhood and and I
contacted Gerri and uh asked them for
some orders to complies and thankfully
they did do that for us. Um but the
education piece is is a is a massive
opportunity for us. Um and we're not
doing enough. I don't feel we're doing
enough as um community to get that
education out there. Um because if they
don't understand the segment or
segregate the garbage, then it's never
going to get picked up. And I can send
out our own city department or I can
send out the region appeal uh garbage
trucks uh after the fact or if they
don't know that they have to separate a
toilet tank from the toilet before it
gets picked up.
>> Yeah.
>> Right. it's never going to get picked up
and that toilet sits. There's nothing
worse than a toilet sitting on the front
lawn. I um but so I I think that
education piece has to be a part of that
round table and how do we not only get
the information to the residents, but
how do we also get the region who does
our garbage collection to start being
more proactive at it as well. Uh and I
don't sit on regional council, so I'll
I'll look to my colleagues here that do
sit on regional council. um but get the
region to be more proactive at
collecting, but also the province has
handcuffed us as well with this
consolidated recycling program that they
have. Um and as of next month, they no
longer you can no longer put recycling
bags at the curb. So everything has to
go in the bins. So we're about to have
an explosion of garbage and explosion of
recycling at our curbs.
>> Or in front of our garages or at the
side of the house where all the rodents
go. So, I think the round table idea is
a great idea, but I think we also need
to look at where we're going to get that
information out and that education out.
>> Yeah. Yeah, I hear you. Yeah,
absolutely. I mean, a story of one of my
walks is watching a U-Haul that had
absolutely no license plate. So, I mean,
I couldn't get it. Dumping all this
stuff. And the problem is it was um an
apartment building. So, who are you
going to find responsible? I believe
that some people need to be educated and
it will work. And I believe that some
people just don't want to pay whatever
it is they're supposed to pay when you
actually go to the recycling bin. So I
think education is one form, but I think
some people are doing it because they
don't want to pay those fees. I mean,
it's not a lot. I've gone to the dumping
ground. I've talked to friends. They say
the same thing. They just don't want to
pay the seven or eight it's going to
cost to dump their stuff. So much easier
for them to do it that way. And they
won't get caught doing it because I mean
it's in an apartment building. who are
you going to and then some of them I do
believe can be kind of sort of talked to
or whether there's a flyer put out or
whether there's something mentioned I
think that a lot of people don't I know
there's a lot of stuff that's posted
online but I think some of those people
don't read that right whether they don't
understand it I don't know um but I
think that's part of the problem is
education and but I also think the
second part of that is being proactive
when they don't when they're educated
and they don't follow the rules, there
has to be consequences because there
aren't any consequences going on right
now. At least not in my neighborhood and
where I'm walking. There's it's the same
people all the time and there's nothing
they feel and sometimes it's normalized,
right? If they're doing it and I see it,
you know, I've got a bag of chips,
there's a whole bunch of garbage there,
so I'm just going to throw it there,
right? So, I mean, it's it's become a
little more normalized than I would like
to see in Bmpton. I mean this I've been
here for 37 years so it's like what's
going on [laughter]
so yeah education is part part of the
problem I think right I can't disagree
>> very good thank you I have another
speaker councelor tour and uh for
members of committee I've been
>> you still have the floor no thank you
>> we've been having a great discussion
this morning but I ask members to try to
focus their efforts on questions of
clarification ation council tour.
>> Thank you through you, Mr. Chair. Um,
just to echo some of the comments that
councelor Power just made here. Um, you
know, I I I see this as an issue only in
some parts of my uh wards, especially in
areas that are higher densities. um
whether those are town houses or if it's
uh homes with ARUS um that's where we
typically um come across these concerns.
I believe education is a key part of it
but at the same time um I believe uh we
have the opportunity to redesign uh some
of our systems especially with the
opportunity of getting waste collection
downloaded now uh to the lower tier here
at the city of Bmpton. Um, you know,
when you have just that one bin outside
of the curb, it can serve a family of up
to four people. Um, but when you have
more than four people in a house in
multiple units, uh, it is definitely not
enough. And there's been a lot of those
cases where, you know, garbage has been
either tied up in bags or left on top of
the bins. And on a windy day, you see it
all across the neighborhood. Happens
across areas where there are apartment
buildings. House of Power and I were uh,
doing a park cleanup, I think a couple
of years ago. uh in those areas as well.
You will see garbage flying out into u
park areas and get caught up in there.
So it is definitely an issue but um I
think to solely uh pinpoint this as an
issue as a userdriven issue I think
would be unfair. um you know I'm sure
there are those cases but I think there
is an opportunity that uh you know
perhaps through staff when we're looking
at waste collection uh in the future I
hope that we can look at opportunities
where if there are multiple units uh at
a residential address that are
registered that we uh have the
opportunity to have uh multiple bins
that could collect uh waste from those
houses as well. Um I think that's the
best way one of the ways at least that
we can uh move forward on this issue
along with the educational piece of it.
Um but and lastly uh through you Mr.
Chair uh I would also just um advise
that maybe don't casually throw around
words like slum cities or slum landlords
or getting a tour of the slums of
another city. Uh those are very
derogatory terms and inappropriate for
these council chambers. Thank you.
Thank you very much, councelor Power.
>> Thank you through chair. Um I I just
want to kind of echo some of what
councelor Tur just said. Um we need to
be perfectly clear that this is not just
a residential rental problem. Um it's
not just roaming houses. Um, and he he
made reference to Nightsbridge
um buildings where I'm a ward counselor
of and they they don't have enough bins.
And I think about Balmorro uh the
townhouse complex towards uh Dixie at
the end of Bal Mororrow. They throw all
their garbage everybody throws their
garbage the night before to the curb and
it's you know you get 20 20 town houses
all piling up their garbage at the curb
and it's unsightly. It's disgusting.
It's all kinds of things. So, we we also
have to go after the property owners or
the building management uh individuals.
We we have to make something so
comprehensive that it's not just
targeted to one area over the other.
>> Agreed. Yep.
>> Thank you very much. I see no further
speakers, Linda. So, I will ask for a
motion of receipt from councelor Power.
All in favor? That carries. Thank you so
much for your delegation this morning.
>> Thank you very much for listening. Thank
you.
to receive. That was a motion of
receipt. Okay. Thank you. And so we now
invite our next delegate, Teresa
Bragado, Bmpton resident, regarding
parking concerns. Welcome, Teresa.
>> Good morning, mayor and members of
council. My name is Teresa Bado, and I
have been a resident of Bmpton for over
55 years. Today, I am here because
enough is enough. I am frustrated with
hearing promises while seeing little to
no results when it comes to bylaw
enforcement in Bmpton. These are not
isolated incidents. Residents face these
issues daily. A simple 45minute walk
through virtually any neighborhood re
reveals dozens upon dozens of obvious
parking infractions and bylaw
violations. I encounter vehicles
obstructing sidewalks and find cars
parked so far over the sidewalk that I
am forced onto the road to get around
them. These violations are neither
subtle nor difficult to identify. They
are obvious, visible, and occurring
every day across the city. As a result,
I'm regularly forced to walk in traffic.
I don't even want to drive in Bmpton in
a car in traffic, let alone walk in
traffic, creating an unnecessary and
entirely avoidable safety risk for
myself and other pedestrians. It happens
so often now that I wear a reflective
safety vest when I walk my dog in the
early morning since I cannot use the
sidewalk. Let's be clear, sidewalks are
meant for walking, not for extending
private driveways or serving as
unauthorized parking spots. We are also
seeing a disturbing trend of boulevards
and driveways being illegally widened
with patio stones that can't handle the
weight of vehicles. Bylaw enforcement's
failure to consistently enforce these
violations sends the message that
pedestrian safety is not their concern
compared to driver convenience. This is
unacceptable.
What makes this even more frustrating is
that elected council approved additional
funding to hire more enforcement
officers. Taxpayers were told that
increasing resources would improve
enforcement and address the growing
number of complaints. So I have to ask
bylaw enforcement where are the results?
The problem is obvious. The current
bylaw enforcement process of warning
first approach is not working. How many
warnings are enough? One, two, five
warnings? At this point, it is difficult
to accept the argument that more
education is required. Residents are
left wondering how many years of
education and warnings are considered
sufficient before enforcement actually
begins. These violations do not require
another conversation, reminder, outreach
campaign. They require tickets over and
over again. This is exactly what
residents expect. But what h but what we
continue to see instead is repeat
offenders who have learned that there
are little if any consequences for
violating the rules. This is called
enabling and prevents repeat offenders
to take responsibility for their
problematic behaviors. The reality on
the ground does not match the picture
that enforcement management has been
presenting to councils over the years.
Residents do not experience their
neighborhoods through carefully selected
statistics and performance metrics. They
experience them through what they see on
their streets, sidewalks, and
communities. Most of the residents
follow the rules because they respect
their neighbors. We take pride in their
community, and we understand that living
in a city requires a shared commitment
to basic standards. Why should those
residents continue to watch the same
offenders repeatedly ignore the rules
without consequences? What message does
that send to the people who do the right
thing? The residents of Bmpton have
already paid for increased enforcement
through their tax dollars. We funded
additional officers back in 2024 when
the department received 4.3 million for
hiring of additional enforcement
officers to add to the then total of 90.
We expect improved outcomes. We expect
visible enforcement. We expect
accountability. Today I'm requesting
that council direct bylaw enforcement
management to provide clear data on the
effectiveness of the additional
enforcement resources that were
approved. How many officers were hired
that actually respond to enforcement
complaints as opposed to managers and
supervisors? How many complaints were
resolved? How many tickets were issued?
How many repeat offenders continue to
receive warnings rather than penalties?
Other than the we will assign the issue
to a bylaw enforcement officer within 7
days. What are the enforcement and
delivery service level commitments?
Elected council must hold enforcement
manageable accountable for delivering
measurable results, not explanations,
excuses or selectively presented
statistics. We are asking bylaw
enforcement to demonstrate that the
investment made by Bmpton taxpayers is
producing real results in our
neighborhood. I have lived in Bmpton for
over 55 years. It is deeply
disappointing to see that this Bmpton is
not the Bmpton that I grew up in. It has
been declining rapidly in the last 8
years. Residents deserve better and they
deserve every right to expect the same
high standards that was once operated in
Bmpton from those entrusted with public
funds and enforcing city's bylaws. Thank
you.
[applause]
Thank you very much, Teresa. And I have
speakers. Councelor Plesi.
>> Thank you. Uh, thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thanks, Teresa, for coming and
delegating.
>> I'm a bit deaf, so you have to be a
little louder.
>> Okay.
>> Thanks, Teresa.
>> No, it works. Seriously,
>> Teresa, thanks so much for coming and
delegating. Thank you for the numerous
uh emails that you send. Uh, thanks for
yelling at us. I We do truly appreciate
it. You do
>> to be honest. I've been here. I've never
involved myself in anything because I
love Bmpton
>> and and it's I know you're passionate
about this city. I know [clears throat]
you love this city. Um we've spoken many
times through email sometimes at 1 2:00
in the morning [laughter] about about
things. Um you shouldn't have to ask
those questions. You shouldn't have to
wonder where these uh where the bot
officers are, where the money went,
where it was spent. You shouldn't have
to. Uh, but it's come to the point where
you do have to because um you're not
seeing the countless number of and I
think the very first email you sent me
was about a car parked over uh over the
sidewalk and it's coming to the point
now that councelor Ber and myself are
actually going to uh community meetings
where there's about five or six
residents that meet us, one in
particular, and he wants to be able to
park his Range Rover on the sidewalk and
he wants us to make that a law for him
for him to do that.
>> And it's and it's unfortunate because
>> that then pushes you to start asking the
questions. And if we have residents that
that can actually that actually start
thinking that they have a right to do
that and impede the the the well-being
and life of other residents that are
walking their dog that are elderly um uh
wheelchairs, everything like that. It
it's there's a point here where you're
absolutely right. notices um you know
get overlooked and education becomes you
know not educating um and then the fines
are the only way to uh to to educate
people cuz where you hit it we we said
it about the traffic cameras the speed
cameras that was the only thing the
research that we've done
>> it it says that that's the only thing
that actually worked and speed is now
becoming um is is starting to climb up
in every single one of those areas is
that we had the speed cameras, which is
unfortunate. But with that, um, it was a
long preamble to ask that, uh, your
questions be, uh, be sent to staff and
for staff to come back with, uh, with a
response to those questions,
>> um, at the next council meeting or
if the next council meeting is okay or
um, when do you have other stuff going
back, council?
>> Okay.
So, we'll leave it open. If you can make
it back for next council meeting, great.
If not, then then I don't want to push
you in, but but have something come back
at a reasonable time.
>> Again, Teresa, thank you for your
delegation.
>> Thank you.
>> And uh if the chair asks if uh councelor
Plesi would be satisfied with it coming
back with the rest of the report that
was moved earlier today in regards to
these delegations, would that be
appropriate?
>> I asked that question. When's that
coming back?
team
>> at the same time.
>> No, no, I need those questions answered
first. I think Yeah, I think I I would
like those questions answered first. I
think we already have the answers for
for the most part of it. So, I look
forward to hopefully having it next
council, if not the one after that.
Teresa, thank you again. Thank you, Mr.
Chair. That's very clear. Thank you,
Councelor Keenan.
>> Thank you so much. And Teresa, thank you
so much for your delegation. Uh really
appreciate you coming in. Um I just want
to add on to councelor Plesi's more
importantly not just your questions. I I
would like to know in that report how
many parking calls came in that weren't
answered and that tickets weren't given
to as part of that report. Please Mr.
Chair. Thank you.
>> Next councelor Santos.
>> Thank you to you Mr. Chair. Thanks
Teresa for coming to to delegate today
and um you know your your level of
frustration is also many residents who
feel the same. Parking continues to be
the number one complaint issue in this
in the city of Bmpton. Certainly, you
know, I have residents who call me
directly because they can't get their um
motorized wheelchair across the sidewalk
because there are cars that are
blocking. I've had uh the same resident
deal with um improper clearing of the
sidewalk and they can't get their
wheelchair across because not only is
there snow issue but then there's also
the the car issue in in the sidewalk. So
one by one many of us have been dealing
with this directly but you're right
there has to be an more efficient
effective way of dealing with the top
concern uh and complaints that we see
receive in the city of Brmpton which is
parking and we just launched the new
automated license plate reader
technology. I think that that is going
to help expedite that process a lot
more. I do believe and I think this is a
if I can get clarification from staff on
this, the automated license plate
reading technology um on the bylaw
enforcement vehicles, can they also
track the overhang vehicles and um those
vehicles that are overhang over the
sidewalk
or is it just illegally on the road?
>> Uh through you, Mr. Chair. Yes,
councelor Santos. technology is quite
sophisticated. So that that matter could
be picked up as well.
>> Okay. So if that's the case, just so so
you know, Teresa, when we implement and
I would like to request we go on
whatever streets Teresa is dealing with
[laughter]
first with those automated license plate
readers.
>> Um but um when they it's a bit
different. So the bylaw officer doesn't
get out of the car anymore.
>> They actually get a ticket in the mail.
>> Okay. So, so if just for education
purposes for the residents here, when
that vehicle comes by, you won't see
necessarily a ticket on the windshield.
They will get a ticket on the mail. So,
at some point, they will realize that
they are parking illegally. We'll have
the evidence to prove it and then they
will they will eventually learn. But
just so folks know, they may not know
and they may not get that ticket because
they're going to be getting it in the
mail a few days later. I know that that
AAL license plate reading was instituted
announcement was made in December 2019.
It was rolled out the middle of January
2020. Are there any statistics which
states how how effective that was before
you purchased the additional six for
2026?
>> Yeah, we we can get those statistics for
you. There are they are um it was quite
effective when we were piloting it. I
think it was one or two vehicles at the
time. um very rapid, really fast in
processing the tickets and it's part of
why we implemented even more um but for
but when we get those answers back at
council we could probably get that
answer back for you as well. Okay,
thanks Teresa.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you very much. So Teresa, we have
a motion moved by councelor Plesi as on
screen to also receive this delegation.
All in favor
>> councelor Plesi further
>> apologies Mr. chair. Um there was a
question about the number of officers,
the monies that were allocated to those
officers as well. If we could just
include that. I know we'll go back and
look at everything you said. Um and and
include that into the referral, please.
I know I just didn't want to I don't see
it captured. So, we're going to go back
and look at all the questions that you
just asked, plus I'll have our offices
look at past emails about any other
outstanding questions and then include
that into it as well. Please. Thank you.
>> Thank you, councelor. Motion moved by
councelor Plesi. All in favor? That
carries. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> And our next delegation is from Kim
Ramita regarding property standards and
parking concerns. Welcome, Kim.
>> Kind [snorts] of nervous now to be
following Teresa.
That was very passionate Teresa.
[laughter]
Uh good morning, Mayor Brown and members
of council. My name is Kim. I lived in
Bmpton over 40 years. Uh before I start
today, I'd like to take a moment to
recognize my two ward counselors for all
their hard work and dedication towards
two and six. Councelor Plesi and
councelor Bar, thank you for always
listening and supporting our
neighborhood group. Without you both, we
would not have been able to resolve many
of the issues that have come up over the
years that are important to us. So, I
thank you both for your commitment and
willingness to always work with all the
residents of your wards.
Across neighborhoods in this city,
residents continue to see the same
persistent issues. Vehicles parked on
sidewalks and lawns, blocked pedestrian
access, overflowing garbage, neglected
properties, and overcrowded rental units
operating without meaningful
consequence. These issues are not
hidden. They are visible, repeated, and
widespread. The lack of enforcement
effectiveness is not just an
inconvenience. It is a safety crisis.
Cars parked overnight on streets congest
those streets, which make it virtually
impossible for emergency response teams
to respond effectively. A friend told me
of an incident where at 10 p.m. one
evening, she called 311 to report cars
parked in front of her driveway, as well
as cars parked in excess of 3 hours on
the street. At 4:00 a.m., firefighters
were knocking on doors to get vehicles
moved that were still parked so they
could attend the emergency further down
the street. It is disturbing to hear
enforcement leadership say during a
presentation that parking does not
affect public safety and those calls are
not prioritized. Residents are doing
exactly what they have been asked to do
by enforcement. We are reporting issues
through 311 and submitting images of the
infraction. When is enforcement going to
do what is asked of them and actually
enforce?
Residents were told that enforcement
would improve through additional hires
and other investments. However, on the
ground, residents continue to see the
same repeat offenders operating without
meaningful consequences. This is an
accountability accountability failure in
how enforcement leadership is directing
priorities, applying discretion, and
measuring success. The current model is
reactive. It relies on complaints to
trigger action rather than ensuring
visible and consistent enforcement
presence in areas where violations are
already well known and ongoing. That
approach has resulted in a system where
residents must repeatedly report the
same issues in order for minimal action
to occur. That is not enforcement. That
is administrative delay disguised
process. The consequence of
enforcement's failure is clear.
declining public confidence, frustrated
residents, and neighborhoods where
bylaws exist but are not consistently
upheld. Enforcement leadership is
responsible for outcomes, not activity,
not internal reporting, not procedural
explanations, outcomes. And the outcomes
residents are experiencing are not
acceptable.
The current enforcement framework is not
working and is not delivering results
that align with residents expectations.
It is therefore incumbent upon council
to direct staff to make swift and
impactful changes with a sense of
urgency as our communities continue to
deteriorate. Bylaws are the baseline
agreement we make with one another to
keep our communities safe, clean, and
livable. When the enforcement of our
bylaws has failed, the civic contract
breaks down. It is time for Bmpton
Enforcement to prioritize the
expectations of residents as they are
not currently being met and protect the
families who call this city home.
Residents are not asking for
extraordinary measures. We are asking
for consistent, visible, and enforced
application of the rules that already
exist. I am requesting council to direct
staff, enforcement leadership, and
management to be held accountable, to
realign their priorities with what
residents have consistently requested,
and to recognize that as taxpayers and
the customers of this service, residents
expect to be heard and served
effectively, something that to date has
not been happening.
>> Thank you very much, Kim. and my first
speaker, councelor Bar.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you,
Kim, for coming here. And honestly,
councelor Ples and I, we've have been
working with the community and seeing
the frustration that you are facing. I I
do understand there's different levels
of government that are involved just
with loopholes going through. Um, we
talked about it with our walkabouts. We
had meetings together and you know, it's
unfortunate that we still have these
parking issues. is not just here but
it's you know everywhere in a lot of
cities that we see in our neighboring
cities. So maybe um through you Mr.
Chair maybe we can add the property
standards to our roundt task force which
will be a great idea to address some of
the issues that our residents had but
also how can we um address those um the
parking related to those rooming houses.
>> Thank you very thank you very much
councelor Bar. So, we'll ask I see the
clerk nodding that we could have that
added. Councelor Plesi.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Uh, thank you for
coming and delegating. Um, I'm going to
talk a little bit, I think, about the
prioritization, the phone calls that you
have made or your residents cuz you
represent today. You represent a ton of
residents especially in the area of uh
of Stonegate uh that have been very
vocal. We know a number of the issues,
number of the calls that they have made.
Um what is your what are you hearing
about the interaction between the
residents and 311 about the prioritizing
of the calls that are coming in whether
it be say for this instance uh for the
instance that you gave an example of the
car parked in front of the driveway.
>> So what is happening is a lot of these
calls seem to go unanswered. Um, we go
through the process of using the app,
then sending an email, then calling by
law, following up, and when that doesn't
work, we're now contacting yourself and
counselor bra.
>> And that shouldn't be happening. I
should not have to make four different
requests and then now get both of you
involved for something that needs to be
dealt with by enforcement.
>> I mean, I'm sure you have other things
to do. And I guess what I would like to
understand, and I've asked this before
about the prioritization
uh specifically around the 311 callers
and who actually determines whether this
is um you know is is one of those
priority one things. It's an emergency
because the way I look at it is it's
it's an emergency in a sense that it's
affecting that person's life at that
time. It's not a cat in a tree, but it's
or it's not a pizza was delivered to the
wrong address, which has happened. Um,
but it's it's if a car is blocked on a
driveway, if if if there's, you know,
parking concerns, if there's no
[clears throat] and and I'm referring to
more like those after hours calls where,
you know, we we used to be the 24-hour
and then we changed it down to uh x
number of hours. Um, are we I guess a
question through you, Mr. chair to staff
is uh who determines the 311
um prioritization
and where are we in terms of the uh
hours of operations for 311 answering
calls as opposed to um it going to
voicemail if staff can answer that
question.
>> Thank you counselor through the chair. I
I'll get a bit more detail on the hours
in a moment. I believe after hours they
go to bylaw directly.
Um but I'll let me double check. Um in
respect of the prioritization that is uh
I'll turn it over to Laura. you can
speak to um as you can imagine if it's
an emergency um we convey that or
transfer to police fire as as the nature
would be but prioritization of a call in
terms of
>> the as you mentioned the P1 P2 that's
that's more of a a bylaw thing and I'll
turn it over to Laura to speak to that
thank you
>> uh thanks Jason and three Mr. Chair,
councelor Plesi, the the um priorities
is there's a safety m safety matrix that
determines the how a call is dispatched.
Um after hours, it's corporate security
that manages those calls. Uh believe
that's from midnight to 7, something
like that. But they're also aware of
that matrix. I don't have the specifics
of it, but I know that that was
developed primarily bylaw in conjunction
with our dispatch partners. So there is
a criteria. I'm happy to give you more
information on that. Okay. So, maybe if
we can get some more information. Um,
that being said, and Kim, you know this
and a number of residents know 31 311 is
going through some changes. It is I
think I personally believe that, you
know, it is going to be a fantastic
service that um that will be once it's
once it's completed.
But I haven't heard anything about
what's going on in a minute. So maybe if
we can have uh an update if there is
already an update or something uh that
can be provided to uh to council and to
the public. Um just to Jason. Yeah.
Through the chair. Um I can share it
with uh council today. Um but if uh
there we have a lot of details on our
website about the 311 call center
modernization. Um phase 2 is underway
and aiming for uh later this year,
probably September, October for
finalization on on phase two around uh
people being able to kind of follow the
call through the process and some uh uh
reminders to internal parties or
external parties uh who who wherever the
the call is uh residents will be able to
kind of follow and see where their call
is. And then just to follow up on the um
as Lauri mentioned, it's uh 311 is 7 am
to or 7 yeah 7 am to 12 am and then it's
over to security. Um
>> okay. Then it needs to move over. Right.
But somebody's answering
>> specific timelines.
>> You can leave a message or you can stay
on the line to get to somebody. Right.
So it's still the it's still a rolling
it's 24hour.
>> Correct.
>> Right.
um to the person that's in 311 that told
me about uh what is coming about
grabbing residents and working with them
to go through a process to to make the
system better. Kim's one of the people
that I want on that list. So Kim, you're
going to come in, you're going to work
through and and so if I can just make
that known now, I appreciate that. Thank
you, Mr. Chair.
>> Thank you, Councelor Plesi. Next, I have
councelor Brock. Thank you.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just want to add,
so we do have Roma from 311 um who has
been an expert and has been working um
very digitally with our 311
communication center, especially with
the modifying and improvements coming
up. Maybe just for clarification if uh
if our Roma or staff can come up and
just to kind of clarify how to
prioritize and what are some of the
things that residents do get confused
with when they click something off and
that may not be a priority or not. And
just some clarification for some of our
residents here. That's all. Yeah.
Good morning through the chair.
>> Good morning.
>> Um, councelor Bart and with regards
sorry, can you just what was the exact
question that you wanted
in terms of priorities?
>> Thank you. Um, thank you through Mr.
Chair. Just want to ask maybe we can
clarify um how priorities take place.
Maybe there's I know uh residents do
have to check mark a certain uh point
where maybe if there's a parking issue
they have to they have to check mark
certain levels and that kind of
determines the prioritization for some
of the areas. Can we just clarify how
those procedures and steps are when they
go through 311
>> run you through a service request?
>> Yes. If
>> I could just ask you to move the mic
down, please. Oh, the mic down. Sorry.
>> So, I can hear you. Sorry. I'm a little
Thank you.
>> My apologies. So, when someone calls in
for a parking request, for example,
depending on what the parking request
is, you can go on tile, you can go
online, you can go through the portal,
they will click and they there are
options to choose down to. So,
if it's blocked, then that is an
emergency. That is a priority call
because someone can't get out of their
driveway. If it is a two to six, if it
is a extended like some sort of parking
problem, I can't really answer to that
because it just goes integrates
indirectly into the Amanda bylaw system
and then those are picked up
by the enforcement officers.
>> Thank you, chair. And I think I just
want to clarify that when you click off
blocked that's an priority and when we
click off 2 to six it's not a priority.
Is that correct?
>> Oh sorry I'll Rita wants to
>> good morning through the chair. Yes that
is correct. I'll speak a little bit more
from the operations side. So when the
residents are clicking the appropriate
parking uh violation in the back end uh
bylaw enforcement application maps it
according to priority 1, priority 2,
priority three. So a blocked driveway is
definitely priority one. Uh a 2 to six
time defense is priority three. Uh so uh
the officers and I'm not speaking on
behalf of bylaw but our officers will go
out for the block driveway. Um 7:00 a.m.
12:00 a.m. we manage the dispatch. Uh
therefore we dispatch priority ones.
It's a top priority uh with regards to
after hours the service optimization
part uh for security services. the
matrix is outlined uh clear and concise
what the officers get dispatched to. So
priority ones is always top of the list
and after 12 a.m. if I may step in it is
usually we it's usually urgent requests
only so harm to people property or
animals.
>> Thank you. Thank you three Mr. Chair and
maybe for Kim um maybe what what are
some of the barriers that you're facing
when you're um going through 311?
just getting a response. I mean, I get
the automated response, but then a lot
of the time, nobody comes out. We're
making the same report over and it's not
just me. It's our neighborhood. It's
neighborhoods that are, you know,
surrounding us. Um, and what happens is
I think if we addressed some of these
smaller issues, a lot of the bigger
issues we are having would probably go
away
>> for sure.
>> No, thank you for that. And I think a
lot of it, you know, so I know city of
Bmpton along with council members and
mayor Brown, we're all working together
trying to make sure bylaw officers are
going up, but again, they're stretched
out. Um that's definitely something that
we're looking at priority ones to take
place, but I know um with our team and
our offices working together, hopefully
we can fix up some of the areas, you
know, slowly and steadily. Thank you. Do
uh we know how big the uh backlog is for
Lila?
>> That's a good question. Do we
have any do
>> so we have a question with regards to
backlog if someone from by could provide
a response or from
could we get that information back in
the report?
>> Councelor Plushy.
>> Thank you Mr. Chair. Um, so I I think
that's a difficult question to answer
because
and I think Kim, you know this as well
as I do, we've talked about it where
there's been calls that have come in and
then all of a sudden they they they're
[clears throat] gone and because of for
whatever reason, uh, you know, that car
is gone or or it was something like the
like that loud muffler one where you
know by the time you get out there it's
going to be gone or for various reasons.
Um, so I think that's a difficult
question, but in general, could that
could that question be potentially
answered uh by way of this the
information that we're asking for uh for
it to come back?
>> Could we I don't know how we answer that
question if maybe Laura can you speak to
that
>> through you Mr. Chair, you're correct,
Councelor Plesi. Quite often, I mean, we
go to every priority one call. So, that
is that's why they're priority one. In
regards to priority two, we hit most of
those or when we get there, the car is
no longer there. So, the officer will
record that. So, we can quantify how the
parking calls are being handled and
bring that back in some fashion. Let me
see if I can in and taken from somebody
that's um gone through the 311 app to
complain about a vehicle that was parked
um on a bend during a snowstorm. Um, I
guess I so I like many residents um and
the ones that are here today uh come to
a point where I'm I'm I'm fed up and I
want to I want to be heard and I'm here
uh screaming for help. Um, so I want to
know that when I call somebody or
residents want to know that them when
they call somebody that that individual
is that bile officer is waiting for my
call and is going to run out and go to
the call and fix the problem. Okay. So
that's the simplicity of of what I want
uh when I make a phone call or when or
when residents call. Now, how many other
residents are like us throughout the
night are making the same call? So, I
think if we can narrow down what the
question is to say, how many officers
are out there on any given night? Pick
our busiest night. How many calls are
coming in? Pick our busiest night. How
many calls are each officer attending?
How long does it take for each officer
to attend the call? Now, I know that's a
tricky one because there's a lot of
times where they have to go out and if
they're waiting for somebody to show up,
they have to wait. Or if they have to do
a report, that takes time because if
it's going to the courts, then they need
to make sure that our officers I think
do a fantastic job in terms of docu the
documentation and everything that they
need that we certainly need to make sure
that this person is going to, you know,
not get off scot-free. So, so they do
they do a fantastic job um that way. So,
if maybe we can
try and bulk that into what that
question actually is.
>> Do you know what I'm trying to say,
Laura?
>> Uh three, Mr. Chair. Yes, Council Ples.
I think that's that actually is painting
more of a real life picture and and I
I'll work with the team to see how we
can get that real data, you know,
>> workable data to council. I I do know
that um we have made a lot of changes
and enhancements in particularly with
our tow roster those kinds of you know
we have recent stats but maybe we can
take a bigger look at how the
progression has happened. Yeah. And as
vice chair of legislative services, I
hear about, you know, the good things
that are happening right across um but
maybe if we can and I don't know what
that timeline looks like. Maybe you can
report next week to let me know what how
long cuz that looks like it it may be a
bigger scope or we already have that
information. I don't know. But I asked
that to be part of the uh deferral or
the referral
um of the other one
or did somebody ask that already? No, we
are we are adding these issues to the
scope of discussions for future bylaw
enforcement. Sure. And part of the round
table
>> but the but that report added to my
about Teresa's uh uh referral that
delegation
if I can have that information come
back.
>> So I'll ask for the clerk to note that
to for it to be added.
>> Perfect. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> Thanks Kim for your delegation.
>> Thank you. So we have a motion moved by
councelor bar to
add these items to the scope of
discussion for future by law enforcement
and round table and also for receipts of
the delegation. All in favor? That
carries. And so with that we now move on
to our next delegation which is from Jim
McKay Bmpton resident regarding grass
cutting and snow clearing. Welcome sir.
Thank you. It's actually Mai. I'm not
the ABC sports um broadcaster. I think
he passed away a few years ago.
>> Mr. Mai.
>> Anyway, I just want to uh thank
everybody for um listening to me today.
Uh special thanks to uh Dennis and
Martin, our counselors that have been um
fighting the good fight. Um I have a
five minute speech here. It's pretty
redundant, so I'm not going to go in it.
So, I'm going to fly by the seat of my
pants and you're going to hear some
terms that you've heard lots of times
before, but I really think when we talk
about this problem, it's been ongoing
for two years. And I don't think you
know what you're solving for. I don't
think strategically know what you're
trying to solve for because when staff
go out and bring something into
compliance, they're in compliance.
at that point in time they've solved the
problem. The fact that it happens again
two weeks later is not their problem. So
your objectives strategically
need to be rethought
and to a certain extent all the comments
that are coming from this side
should perhaps be set aside and listen
and bring in the really good experts who
know how to solve these types of
problems.
I spent 30 years in risk management. We
dealt with problems every day. We use
data. We use riskbased solutions and
strategic metrics. I know you've never
heard that Dennis and Martin from me.
It's a broken record. But I heard Lara
say, "I can get you that information
today." I heard people say, "Well, what
about what's the problem with repeat
offenders?" These are the strategic
metrics that you need to have at your
fingertips. So you know progress has
been made. You get facts that tell you
this is what we've done. You never get
facts about well this is still a
problem. We haven't solved this. We
don't know how to get to it. Because you
need to have the right objectives in
place. And that objective pretty clearly
based on the amount of discussion we've
heard about uh repeat offenders is you
need to prevent this from happening. not
just bring it into compliance. It's
happening over and over and over by the
same people and you're looking at this
on mass instead of a focused approach
against the repeat offenders that would
cut your cost down. Bring allow you to
focus on the people that are causing the
problem and once those problems diminish
then you can start going back and
solving everybody's problems. you don't
have the resources because we've been
talking about this for two years to
answer everybody's call. You're going to
have to figure out what gets done first
and it should be repeat offenders.
Again, I heard the prioritization
process works against um on a security
basis. Well, security has to be an
override, so you can't avoid it, but why
not deal with this on a repeat offender
basis? number one issue that's been
talked about by everybody at this table
today. If you focused on those, that
message will get out just like the
parking the speeding tickets message got
out. You can get there very very
quickly.
Uh
that riskbased approach leverages data.
You don't have the right metrics. I know
it because I get the same output reports
every single time. And there's so many
questions that you that we should be
asking. You can't get to the answers
because the data is not there. You need
to look at your data. You need to know
what do I want to know and what are the
things that I need to know that I'm not
getting. Like if a repeat offender is
going crazy and we don't even know about
it, that should be highlighted. That
should be strategic. Strategically, this
council should say, "We've wiped out 20%
of the repeat offenders." And you need
to put fines in place that increase,
escalate, and are a deterrent
because right now, I heard that, well,
it's a cost of business. They can just,
okay, I'll pay it. They're not going to
get me for another year. I'll pay it. In
the meantime, I'll continue and not
change my ways.
Rod, you talked about education. I don't
think this is an education problem. If
you want it to be an education problem,
the first time they get a fine, give
them a pamphlet and say, "Read this so
you don't do it again." But don't spend
a lot of money on education when that's
not what's we're losing the war here.
We're losing the war because people are
taking advantage of a system where trust
used to be in place and the trust is no
longer in place and people are running
circles around us and you're playing by
the rules and they're killing you. We
see it all over the place in politics
today.
Uh,
sorry. This is off the cuff, so you're
going to have to um I think my four
points just to finish would be make sure
you know what you're trying to solve
for. I don't think it's compliance and I
don't think it's education. The issue is
so pervas pervasive that you need to
look at this from a prevention
standpoint. How do you prevent this from
happening? That should be your number
one question that I would be solving
for.
>> Thank you. Thank you very much, Jim.
>> Oh,
[applause]
this this was supposed to be ad hoc. I
was supposed to have lots of time, but
sorry, I rambled.
>> I will ask councelor Keenan to start us
off with you at our his first question.
Thank you.
>> Uh thank you so much. Um you know, time
and time again, I've heard you with the
matrix and we're not looking at the
right stuff. Um and obviously you feel
like this is something that will make a
significant difference. So, I'm going to
ask you to join that round table to
provide us what those metrics should be
and let's utilize the experience that
you have um to to do that. Um so, thank
you so much for your delegation and your
passion, but just to keep it brief, I
feel if we put you there um we'll get to
the results that we're expecting because
I have heard you at town halls
expressing the same thing time and time
again, noting that there is improvement
happening, but we need to balance it and
show what those true numbers are and
what those metrics should be. So happy
to have you on that round table if you
would accept and then we could finally
um get to the bottom of it and not you
know be danced around as you put it.
>> Yeah. I and I just want to say I think
there's improvement and I'm not trying
to be critical but when you tell me that
um calls or issues or tickets have gone
up 20%.
I don't know if calls have gone up 50%.
So I never know whether we're truly
getting the right performance that we
think we are. And until you look at this
properly with the right lens with the
right uh ex [clears throat] uh outside
influences,
you're you're guessing.
>> Yeah. Thank you so much for your
delegation. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
>> Thank you, Councelor Santos.
>> Thanks so much for your delegation, Jim.
And I hear you. I hear your frustration
as well in terms of the the repeat
offenders. you brought something up
that's really important and happy you're
going to be on the task force as well.
Um I'm going to bring back the uh model
in Edmonton again because what was
interesting there was that they not only
used data and 311 data and fines and
tickets as data but they also did
something because they they have a task
force dealing with this with residents
as well which is great. So we're kind of
moving in that direction in dealing with
repeat offenders. They also have
something. They collect community impact
statements on those problem properties
that are having such a huge impact on
their neighboring properties and their
neighbors mental health, well-being,
quality of life. And that's what
unfortunately where this frustration is
coming from because you want your
neighborhood to be clean and safe. You
take care of your property. You do the
grass. You take care of the garbage
properly. And then for some reason the
neighbor next to you or two down doors
down from you, you're also doing work to
hold them accountable to take care of
their property. So the frustration is
very real because they are repeatedly
not taking care of the property and
impacting everyone else. So one of the
things that they did in Edmonton with
their problem property initiative was
take community impact statements that
would also withhold in court.
They said to us during this this um
experience and I think we're going to be
able to implement a lot of best
practices from them that you know
sometimes municipalities are scared that
someone's going to take them to court
and that the landlord's going to take
them to court and the deputy chief who
was the person in charge of this program
said you know what let them take us to
court at the end of the day the people
who are suffering because of this one
problematic property are the residents
who surround them. So, let them take us
to court. And so, they started
developing community impact statements
and collecting evidence to add to the uh
data that you're talking about in terms
of the complaints coming in, the fines
that are being charged, etc. So I think
that when we bring the report forward,
the RL update report, we will add also
recommendations to take a look at the
city of Edmonton model to include things
like the community impact statements
that are collected, their subclass tax
rate, how they've created other um
internals task force to deal with repeat
offenders. Does that sound good to you,
Tim?
>> Well, you don't have to recreate the the
wheel here, right? If somebody's built a
mouse trap that's working,
>> Yeah. It's a lot easier to implement.
It'll cost you less and you can move
much faster.
>> Thank you for your delegation.
>> Thank you, Councelor Santos. Councelor
Maderos.
>> Uh thank you for you uh Mr. Chair. Uh
thank you for the delegation, Jim. Um
again, uh I I do appreciate um all the
comments. I think you touched on
something I think that we sort of deal
with here because you know one of the
first impressions I keep hearing and and
trying to demystify it um staff when
they present reports all our data a
resultsbased plan there there's a whole
level of accountability in this
organization there's a senior leadership
table um staff report to the
commissioner the commissioner reports
that come to council that is our duty
We don't get into the weeds on that
specific address. We look at the broad
data and there has been improvement.
There has been investments. Um I won't
get into the whole sort of broad
contextual piece is you know same thing
that our police officers struggle with
as our population over the last 10 years
has really outgrown.
We're struggling to keep, you know, from
the policing perspective to keep
adequate policing to our population
growth because you can't just keep
throwing money because that'd be a huge
impact on the tax bill. Similar to the
struggles police have, we can't just
keep hiring bylaw officers over and over
and over. So, one of the challenges that
you've, you know, I think have been very
effective on saying is how do you
regulate personal behavior? It's the
same thing I would throw back to you is
why can't police stop speeding? Why
can't police stop crime? It's individual
behavior. So this idea that we can get
in front what we can do, you know, and I
think you've you're effective on doing
this is we get reports staff put in
time. they they have the stats, they
have the results based, but anecdotally
because I live in the same community as
you I will know certain people got
ticketed and again I know there's a
process we have to follow and I think a
little bit of what we're dealing with
here is you know talking about the
effectiveness how effective is this? So
I'm not sure if you might know we do
have an audit committee. I believe uh
councelor Keenan is so this council has
the opportunity to effectively do an
audit on programs and services they
think that need to be looked at. So I
think you know one of the things I'm
happy to refer this delegation to the
audit committee uh regarding our
enforcement perspective that's where uh
because what I see is you know from our
perspective we get reports I'm not a by
officer even though I've gone out with
the bylaw officers I've spent the day in
their shoes because I see there's a
disconnect with the community what their
expectations are and the fine work that
our our folks are doing and to simply
You know what I keep hearing as sort of
a uh I would say as a a theme is that
there's a lack of effectiveness or
there's no program evaluation. And I
could tell you from our perspective
being around this table, staff probably
do this on a daily basis. There's a lot
of pressure on them from this council
because we're getting pressure from the
community. Um, so I think that the the
the real struggle that we're having
right now is the overall results we're
seeing and we compare it probably to
other communities. We have improved.
It's not again what people's
expectations are because people's
expectations are they don't want to see
that same number house, you know, still
have that garbage, still have that so
on. But effectively, you know, we've
challenged our staff and I think if you
know, having spent the day with them,
having understand the processes we're
going, you know, I I do think it merits
us looking at when you talk about
effectiveness, but we're never going to
get to that absolute number where it
stops and that's the struggle with. So,
you know, as we continue on this, it's a
sort of, you know, you talked about the
lost war. I'm not sure if it's a lost
war. we continue to sort of, you know,
to to go after it. But then after, you
know, when I mirror what happens in sort
of crime issues when everyone talks
about need bail reform, everyone gets
off the street, crime keeps going on,
crime keeps going. We, you know, to a
smaller degree are struggling with that
same what is sort of that bail reform
that we need here. What do we go after
the defendants? And I think, you know,
one of the things I think councelor uh
Santos touched upon is having more
resources from the province. You know,
we can't just go levy taxes on a home
and and the the uh the uh possibility of
this doing is from a provincial
perspective. I think it's almost going
to be zilch. So, what I think right now,
I think you've touched upon something
because there seems to be a lack of
confidence. How do we restore confidence
that, you know, things are measurably
getting better? because I do see out
there people hear things are getting
better but these are very recurring
issues and you know I think there is
just to so people understand there's
program evaluation going on there's
policy reform there's levels of
accountability there's a leadership team
people know and and right now we have an
election coming up and that's probably
the most for example accountability that
we will face but you know I think I just
didn't want people to leave here today
to think there isn't conversations
around the table. How do we constantly
improve our uh our uh um you know
enforcement? How do we ensure we're not
getting by officers? That is probably on
top of mind every day. So I think you
know trying to get some restore
confidence you know would sending it to
an audit having an audit of our
enforcement is that something that you
think would retore confidence someone
who's in that field to come back and get
that information to sort of see what a
third party would see and we've you know
to my knowledge and my understandability
again there's channels of accountability
this goes through three or four layers
of people on it and ultimately we're
accountable to you but with an and audit
sort of give you that sort of
understanding because comparatively I
would challenge probably to all
neighboring communities we're not that
bad in terms of our enforcement doesn't
mean that we're opportune that you're
not going to be happy because this is
ongoing you know addressing the issue um
so just wondering from your perspective
of do you think an audit of our
enforcement would do would have that
effectiveness and trying to restore
confidence that we're on the right page
>> pardon That was a fivem minute question.
[laughter]
Um, so I think at some point in time an
audit would be helpful. I think this
there's enough knowledge circulating
here that you could start. I really like
the Edmonton idea. There's been other
things that have been raised uh, you
know, for um, things you could do. Um, I
I think I would concentrate on what are
the lowhanging fruit that you can focus
on and get out the door quickly and
maybe two years down the road have an
audit then. But I also want to be clear,
I didn't say that there hasn't been
improvement. What I said was because the
metrics aren't very um uh uh good. I
don't know whether that's true or not.
And so and and if you it's just simple
trending. If your calls are going up
20%.
But you're only getting uh 10% of
satisfactory conclusions on your on your
work by the enforcement, you're actually
falling further behind. And you you
can't make that comparison based on the
data that everybody presents to us all
the time. So you need to have that
reporting data in place so that you can
get those those answers and that will
help instill the confidence as well as
you say here's my objectives and then
you say I'm using the Edmonton report.
It's going to solve these things. Um
these other items are going to solve
that. Here's the ones that we can't get
to right away because we've got res
resource constraints. get those things
in place and then say okay and now we're
going to top it off with an audit down
the road that says what have we done and
how good have we done it and they'll be
able to help you with that.
>> Yeah. And and through you Mr. chair. Um,
you know, I appreciate when you're
looking at the data sets. You know, I
would challenge probably other
municipalities probably, you know,
report on the same data sets and metrics
and maybe the round table will help
restore some confidence on those data
sets that you think that we're not or
that you think are not being uh compiled
that is not informing more effective
programming response. And I think that
connect that this connection a little
bit because again from from what I've
seen here um in terms of where we're
going from bylaw and where we're going
you know I think we've been effective uh
as an organization our municipality is
really focused on this issue more so in
other communities and more so and and
I'm not sure if it might be a surprise
other municipalities come to Bmpton to
try to get resources speak to our bylaw
officers because of their expertise
because they don't face the amount of
issues that we have and the complexity
of those issues and I think you know one
of the things that we should be sort of
proud as a community is the fact that
there is this laser focused on this
issue and I I I just think that you know
some of the sort of language that you
keep referring to in terms of not the
right metrics while you know in terms of
other municipalities they're looking at
the exact same metrics that we are there
isn't a magical you know metric out
there that will provide provide us that
input that will be able to make us more
effective and and that is sort of the
challenge and and you know having a
round table is going to be great for us
to all sit around and discuss this but I
don't want to underestimate or sell
short that this isn't laser focused by
our staff and I you know I appreciate
>> Martin just saying yeah you you can be
improving and still fall falling behind
>> understandably
>> okay so I I'm not having this debate
with you. I'm not saying I haven't seen
improvement. I talked to you. I talked
to Dennis. I've seen good work happen.
But today in this discussion,
there were three requests from this side
of the office or the building for new
metrics and Lauren said, "Oh, okay. I'm
going to go back and get you that." Like
that came from this discussion. That's
not Jim Mai saying this is a strategic
metric. You guys are saying I need this
information. That's when you have
information on on repeat offenders. You
can go to people and say, "I know it's a
problem, but we've knocked it down by
80%."
And people go, "80%."
And [clears throat] like that's the
confidence building, but when I look at
a stat that I can't draw any conclusions
from other than you're telling me it's
working and then 10 people stand up here
and criticize what's happening to them
personally, you're never going to win
that war that way. It's never going to
happen.
>> Thank you, Jim. Any further questions?
Yeah. No, I I'd like to refer if it's
possible to refer to audit committee as
well. Not only receive it but also refer
to audit committee. Um and uh I thank
you very much. Thank you.
>> Thank you very much councelor Maderos.
So we have legislative services wishes
to speak. Laura,
>> thank you counselor or Mr. Chair. Um we
are scheduled to um have an audit
committee uh exercise in 2027. So I
think this is very good timing if we've
got the the round table take those
findings as well. So I I see I see a a
flow here which is which is I think
going to be quite helpful. One of the
things that I'd like to say uh Jim thank
you again for we've had a few
conversations and I've come to realize
that part of what the gap perhaps is is
I know what the current volumes are and
the improvements. perhaps we're not
doing a good enough job of sharing all
of that data. So, you know, your lens is
going to be very helpful for us to
understand where the gaps are in our
communication. Uh just for example,
parking calls have gone up 2% but
tickets have gone up by 50%. So,
>> that's a great metric.
>> I know. I thought I'd make you smile.
So, [laughter]
>> my confidence building already
>> there. So, but you know, but truly we do
appreciate the different perspectives
and I think we're we have an opportunity
here to see continued improvement.
>> Thank you very much. So, we have a
motion of referral to the audit
committee and also motion of receipt for
the delegation for Mr. Jim Mai. All in
favor? That carries. Thank you, Jim. And
we're now looking at the time, but I do
believe we have two more delegations
that I think we need to get to. Our
first our second to last is from Mike
Agus, Bmpton resident, regarding
enforcement operations citywide,
including complaints and processes and
service delivery relating to property
standards and parking enforcement.
Welcome, Mike.
>> Hi. Uh, respectfully, can I just request
an extra minute or 60 seconds? Uh,
please.
>> In looking at our committee, you have
it.
>> Thank you. I want to uh acknowledge
Mayor Brown, Councelor Dennis Keenan,
and Councelor Rowena Santos. Many of the
enforcement changes residents asked over
the past several years were changes that
we were once told were impossible.
Because of your willingness to listen
and uh challenge existing processes and
push for meaningful reform, many of your
changes now have been implemented.
In February 2025, the enforcement SOPs
were approved by council and the report
acknowledged that the previous reactive
enforcement model was inefficient. It
stated that officers time was largely
consumed by traveling between different
enforcement calls, often requiring
multiple trips across the the city
during a shift. It is now mid 2026
and recently after speaking to an
officer he stated that during his shift
he would be able to attend 7 to 12 calls
on average per day. He confirmed that he
spends most of his day driving around.
He also shared that the officers
referred to this as spinning wheels all
day. The Amanda system distributes files
to officers based on a flawed
methodology. A single property with
multiple violations can uh generate
multiple Kobe files. Those files are
often assigned to multiple officers and
therefore will be investigated
separately. The current auto rotation
distribution methodology creates an even
distribution workload on paper to
officers to enforcement officers.
However, it creates an inefficient
system that produces a neverending
backlog.
We do not always need to solve problems
with more money and more staff. The
question that needs to be addressed is
why does the enforcement management
continue to allow the Amanda system to
continue to waste resources by
needlessly deploying officers all over
the city which has already been
recognized a year ago to be inefficient.
The enforcement 2025 SOP also described
the proactive loop methodology as a way
that officers to attend known areas of
concern in an efficient in an efficient
geographical order. The SOPs also stated
that officers assigned to these loops
are supposed to prioritize capturing all
violations. What residents are actually
experiencing is that the proactive loop
does not function as a true street level
proactive enforcement. A property can be
identified through what residence is
told as a proactive loop while another
property less than 100 ft away in worst
condition receives no action at all. The
loop if the loop is truly proactive then
residents should reasonably expect
violations to be in the immediate area
to be addressed while the officer is
already there. If the loop is only
following up on active complaints, then
it should not be communicated to
residents as proactive enforcement.
Those are two very different things.
What enforcement leadership is
delivering is a reactive model with a
proactive label attached to it. The
February 2025 SOP states that
progressive enforcement does not reset
for each violation. Officers are to
review the premise, enforcement history,
and where education has been reasonably
provided to proceed to enforcement.
We see the same problematic properties
year after year. Despite our repeated
reporting and following up, residents
are asking why escalated enforcement is
not being applied consistently.
A chronic non-compliant property should
not be able to cycle through various
infractions and be given repeat warnings
as resident get the same short-term
compliance and the same relapse
following by the same lack of
consequences. I have personally observed
uh an officer say, "I'm not going to
give you a ticket if you clean up the
garbage by the end of the day." despite
the property being a very problematic
property and it has been confirmed that
the property was on the proactive loop.
This is not enforcement. This is a loop
of non-compliance.
Properties have uh properties have
documented history of non-compliance.
The appropriate enforcement response of
e escalation is clearly documented in
the February 2025 SOP and that's not
being followed. Enforcement escalation
highlights part of the issue as well.
Escalation should not uh escalation
should be the exception for residents to
get resolution and unfortunately it has
often become the only path of
resolution.
This demonstrates that the regular
process is simply not working. Residents
responsibility should end once the issue
has been reported. However, the reality
is that residents are left to manage
their complaint to ensure their
resolution. Residents should not have to
track Kobe numbers for months as they
should be able to trust the process.
Taxpayers already fund a well-paid
bureaucracy of supervisors, managers,
senior enforcement personnel whose
mandate is to oversee operations,
monitor compliance trends, review
enforcement outcomes, and ensure
procedural consistency. Given the city's
reported increases in patrol,
enforcement actions, fines, technology,
and related resources, the city already
possesses significant administration and
operational capacity within the existing
staffing structure. However, increased
activity does not prove that there has
been gains in efficiency and improved
outcomes that residents were told they
could expect.
I am respectfully requesting council to
support an independent operational
review of how the Amanda system assigns
files and what efficiencies can be
optimized with existing resources. I am
happy to be a resident adviser of the
review to ensure taxpayers funded
enforcement resources are being used
efficiently. residents deserve proof
that legislative services and
enforcement management are efficiently
managing the resources it already has.
Thank you.
>> Thank you, Mike.
[applause]
Councelor Keenan,
>> thank you. And thank you, Mike, for your
delegation. Um, you're probably uh one
of the smartest residents when it comes
to knowing our bylaws inside and out.
Uh, you you definitely have taught me a
thing or two. So, thank you for that.
Um, I understand the frustration with
the Amanda system. Um, to the point
where I didn't know it was called the
Amanda system in this particular I've
only heard us talk about that when it
came to planning. Um, so
I know the frustrations when a by
officer is driving by and tons of
properties there and we're told that
that car is being going to other calls.
Um, it's been happening for quite some
time. Um, so I will take your suggestion
here because I've recently seen
technology and we're going through this
with AI and stuff on how it things can
be done better and more efficiently.
I've seen one through public works when
it comes to potholes and how that
software can, you know, tell you the
size of the pothole, direct the routes
where people should go and the
efficiency that it brings. When I looked
at it, I said, "Wow, they should be in
311 for multiple more things." Um, but I
think what I'll do is I'll refer this to
staff to look at um new technology and
AI and report back to council on um more
efficiencies when it comes to what that
could be. Um the the next piece is the
proactive um portion. It's something
we've been talking about for a long
time. Pieces of it. Um I do know that uh
Rob Higs has been working on something.
So, um, if I could ask maybe Rob, when
is or to, uh, the commissioner, um, do
we know when something like that will be
coming and being presented to us or
would you like me to refer this to have
that report brought to council?
>> Uh, through you, Mr. Chair. Uh,
councelor Keenan, we, uh, perhaps we can
give a highlight of what that new
pilot's going to look like. Um, maybe
after we get through the delegations and
bring the RL report up. We're we're
prepared to introduce it.
>> So, perfect. and and just on time. I
just want to thank you again. Um and
hopefully these two um items that you've
brought up amongst others will be solved
through these delegations and working
with staff. So, thank you so much.
>> Perfect. Thank you.
>> Thank you, Councelor Santos. Come back,
Mike.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Just a very quick
thank you, Mike, for your perseverance.
I know that you do this because you want
to see our neighborhoods look better,
for us to do better, and I know that the
repeat offenders continues to be a
frustration for everyone. when we bring
up the RL report at the end of these
delegations, um we'll hear about the
proactive pilot that that folks have
been working on, which is going to be a
new thing on top of the task force and
some of the other things we're going to
be doing based on all of these
delegations. So, thank you so much,
Mike.
>> Thank you, Roina.
>> Thank you very much. We have a motion
moved by Councelor Keenan to refer this
delegation to staff and to receive the
delegation. All in favor? That carries.
Thank you, Mike.
>> Thank you. And now we will welcome
Kathleen McDermott, Branson resident in
regards to property standards concerns.
Kathleen, welcome.
>> Thank you, chair. Thank you, uh, Mayor
Brown and members of council for the
opportunity to address my concerns
regarding, um, enforcement of property
standards in the city of Bmpton. I'm
here today to speak about what I believe
is an ongoing failure to consistently,
effectively, and most importantly,
efficiently enforce property standards
across our city. this respons the
responsibility of service delivery
ultimately rests with enforcement
management and it's our neighborhoods
that bear the consequences while
enforcement continues to fall short.
Before I continue, however, I'd like to
thank those members of councils,
especially my ward counselors who have
repeatedly met with residents, listen to
our concerns, and worked with us to find
solutions. Your continued willingness to
engage with residents has been
appreciated. Additionally, I would like
to call out councilors Kenan and Santos
for specifically championing the RRL.
Thank you for your tremendous work to
date. I know we can count on you both to
continue making positive changes. So,
thank you. Unfortunately, the public
holds council responsible for many of
the shortcomings. They're actually the
responsibility of city bureaucrats, in
this case, enforcement management.
Council members have consistently
engaged with residents in a meaningful
way and always advocated on behalf of us
in pursuit of meaningful solutions. So,
thank you. Accountability for service
delivery ultimately rests with
enforcement leadership. Despite repeated
attempts by residents to engage
constructively with enforcement, many
feel their concerns are dismissed rather
than meaningfully addressed. Property
standards and municipal bylaws exist for
a reason. Residents expect that when
violations are reported, they will be
investigated promptly, addressed fairly,
and resolved effectively to minimize
repeat and ongoing violations.
Unfortunately, the reality experienced
by residents is very, very different.
Over the past several years, I've spoken
with numerous residents who have
reported concerns regarding neglected
property maintenance, chronic parking
violations, including parking on lawns,
overcrowded, overflowing garbage, and
many other property standard
infractions. Many of these concerns are
concentrated in rental properties,
whether legal or illegal. Time and time
again, residents describe long delays,
repeated file closures without
meaningful resolution, inconsistent
enforcement, and outcomes that do not
accurately reflect the conditions that
were first reported. As a result, public
confidence in the city's enforcement
process has severely eroded. Many
residents no longer believe that
reporting violations will actually lead
to meaningful um action and have given
up entirely.
Many residents are reluctant to appear
before council through public de
delegations. So, I not only speak for
myself, I speak for many residents who
are frustrated and extremely
discouraged. In May 2024, Mike and I met
with Mayor Brown to discuss these
concerns. We met again in 2025 and were
joined by the commissioner of
legislative services under whose
portfolio enforcement reports. During
the discussions, we discussed
enforcement standard operating
procedures and it became very apparent
that the challenges stem from how these
procedures are designed and applied. The
questions remain what council and
residents understand as zero tolerance
and proactive
uh uh what they actually mean and
whether enforcement's operational
definitions reflect those expectations.
Similarly, residents consider a
proactive enforcement offers different
significantly from what is being
delivered on the ground. Many residents
believe that the current emphasis on
education as a primary enforcement
response is not aligned with community
expectations. Residents understand the
value of education but also expect
meaningful consequences for repeat
offenders and chronic non-compliance.
Unfortunately, there is a Grand
Canyonsized gap between council's
expectations, residents lived
experiences, and enforcement's
operational practices. Council has
consistently demonstrated a desire to
protect our neighborhoods and maintain
community standards. Residents expect
bylaws and property standards to be
enforced in a fair, timely, and
effective manner. Yet procedures used by
enforcement often produce outcomes that
fall extremely short of those
expectations and residents lived
experiences. Residents are not seeing
results and that is why we are here. I'm
formally requesting that council
undertake an independent thorough review
of enforcement leadership structure,
their standard operating procedures,
performance metrics, and accountability
mechanisms. A process designed without
consideration for resident outcomes and
lived experiences cannot act accurately
measure success. Success cannot be
solely measured by the number of files
closed. Success should be measured by
whether ne neighborhood out concerns are
resolved. Community standards are
maintained and residents experience
tangible improvements in their
neighborhoods. Council has consistently
aligned and championed our cause and
demonstrated its commitment to
protecting Bmpton's neighborhoods. I'm
asking today that enforcement practices
be brought into alignment with that
vision so that residents have confidence
that property standards are being
meaningfully enforced. I'm leaving
behind a package today containing more
than 150 photographs taken over just the
past two weeks. These images provide a
snapshot of conditions across our
neighborhoods and should raise serious
concerns about the and questions about
the effectiveness as what's being
described as proactive enforcement.
The images will speak for themselves. So
again, thank you for your time today and
your continued commitment to the
residents of Bmpton. I thank you.
>> Thank you very much, Kathleen.
Thank you,
>> Councelor Kenan.
>> Thank you. And through you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you, Kathleen, um for your
continued dedication to the city. Um you
know, I strongly listen to your
delegation. I feel like council here
today have directed um staff to report
back on a lot of the items that um you
brought up in your delegation. So my
only question to you is is there
anything that we have missed that you
would like to um like for council to do
still?
>> Um I think we're looking for outcomes
and um I think it's a step in the right
direction when um community members are
being invited into audit processes um
and to participate actively. I know
there was a suggestion of having a
committee and it might not be this term,
it might be next term. Um that is
something that we've been asking for and
um we haven't unfortunately had a um
meaningful birectional uh engagement
with enforcement. Um this is typically
um we find there's a lack of
collaboration there. We've despite our
best efforts um at town halls we see we
hear the same thing over and over again.
So having some sort of um community
presence um and having enforcement at
the table and having to listen to us
because they're it it's they're
reporting on things that aren't
necessarily important to us. Um yeah,
great there's um you know you've stopped
A, B, or C, but it's really X, Y, and Z
that's top priority as the priorities
need to align. So having that
birectional communication I think will
be helpful.
Okay. So, um, thank you again for coming
in. Um, you know, I I I do believe that
that's going to be a big part of how we
can change things. I know that yourself
and a lot of residents of mine and
councelor Maduros were involved in the
311 dialogue to help fix some issues
we're having with 311 and we've seen the
success there. So, I look forward to
seeing the success here as well. Thank
you, Mr. Chair.
>> Thank you, councelor. Councelor Santos.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. And I think after
Kathleen's delegation, we should move
the RL report up. um and just deal with
that and also have Rob Higs talk about
the proactive pilot program that we're
going to be uh implementing uh very
soon. So, uh a couple of things with
respect to the communication and um I
guess regular communication with bylaw
enforcement with the residents. I I'm
going to bring it up again. So in
Edmonton, just so people know, in
Edmonton, they shared that part of their
problem property initiative also
includes a monthly coffee meeting in the
community with bylaw enforcement
officers and fire prevention officers
and fire as well. Um and that open
dialogue informal way for residents to
actually communicate directly with
enforcement officers on a monthly basis
in different neighborhoods has really
established a level of public trust and
understanding um in in the
implementation of how they deal with
chronic repeat uh offenders when it
comes to problem property. So that's
another thing I think when we bring the
report up and ask staff to look at the
Edmonton model that we could also look
at and implement. Another piece that I
just want to highlight too in dealing
with repeat offenders, one thing that
we've been talking about, councelor
Keenan and I, um, with with by law
enforcement, is upon renewal of an RRL
license, if you are deemed as a chronic
repeat offender, in order to renew your
license, you need to pay a security
deposit upfront.
and you have to pay it because you're
known as a repeat offender problem
property that's requiring so much
resources and time and just like if
you're renting out a hotel room they
hold
>> council tour
>> a point of order just uh I don't think
this is a question to the delegation or
related to this delegation if we're
discussing the report then please let me
know Mr.
I'm not done. My question
>> tour we have brought the report forward.
So we are dealing both with the
delegation and before is is also the
report 10.2.2.
>> Yeah. So Kathleen would something like
that be an interesting solution in terms
of like you know for residents to
consider as an improvement. So we're
identifying after 18 months of
implementing the pilot program and now
rolling it out across the city who the
repeat offenders are. you know, if we
can't get a subclass property tax
bracket because the provincial
legislation is not able to allow us to
do that, can we look at something
similar to, you know, you're renting a
hotel room, they're charging back $500
because they want to make sure they get
the room back, you know, in proper
order. In a similar way, in order to
renew your license, you need, if you're
a repeat offender, you require an X
amount security deposit, and we will
hold that until you start changing your
behavior. What do you think about that?
So, um there's it's a bit of an answer.
So, um we uh had suggested or we had met
with uh Mayor Brown to con our concerns
about uh multi-unit properties uh taking
resources and having uh the impact
assessment. It's being reassessed. Um
and unfortunately, it's out of
provincial or sorry, it's provincial
jurisdiction to increase property taxes.
um because we're concerned with the you
know garbage resources and I know
councelor Tur had suggested extra bins
or something like that at the beginning
of the the meeting today. Who's paying
for those resources? Um who gets to um
like all the way down the line there's
resources to manage that process and
then picking up the garbage. I pay
property tax for two bins. So when you
get four bins, who's going to levy that?
So um we had made the so we have gone to
our provincial representative and and
pushed the question about impact. So I'm
not a keyboard warrior. So I get up and
I go and I do those things that you know
I learned from council when I engage. Um
the other thing we had done at attended
a town hall um and Mike had actually
made the suggestion at the time to
enforcement with regards to some sort of
deposit and every time we make a a
suggestion like that it's always turned
around no why it can't be done whereas
when we come to council we always get
counselors working with us and finding a
a way to a path to um what we need. So
there's always a workaround. So always
um so yes is my answer and we have made
that suggestion before but it was met
with a no. So it's very refreshing um
for for you to be able to suggest that
to council Santos. Thank you so much.
>> If I may ask councelor Santos that we
wrap up the delegation first so that we
can then deal with the report.
>> Happy to receive the delegation from
council.
>> All right. So thank you Kathleen. We
have a motion of receipt moved by
councelor Keenan to receive your
delegation. All in favor? That carries.
Thank you. And now we will work on item
10.2.2
report on the RRL. Councelor Santos, you
still have the floor.
>> Thank you through you, Mr. Chair. If I
would ask Director Rob Higs to please
share with us the proactive pilot um
that we're planning to implement. Some
details on that, please.
>> Is he here? Yeah, there he is.
>> And then if I would ask the the clerk if
you could just cue up the added
recommendations based on our discussion
that I've provided earlier today as
well.
>> Through you, chair. Thanks very much,
counselor. Uh at the direction of the
CAO, he'd ask that uh we put forward a a
ward-based proactive enforcement pilot.
Uh what this will do is it will provide
wardspecific counselor informed
proactive enforcement.
Uh while with the full framework will be
sent out uh later today to the
counselors uh explaining the entire
nuances of it. Uh the short version
would be that uh we will provide you
with the top five repeat offenders in
your ward uh as well as what calls are
associated to it and then invite you to
uh look at that list. we will focus on
those five uh and then we'll invite you
to add to that list whether through uh
specific properties that are a concern
that you're seeing that isn't uh
demonstrated within the 311
uh data yet is still a community concern
as well as if it's uh generic streets
that are a consistent issue. uh we will
make endeavors to ensure it's the same
staff assigned on the rotating ward
basis to increase familiarity.
uh within those reasons. What we've
presented uh we can implement without
negatively impacting the operational
budget uh or existing resident requested
service and delivery expectations
or our uh counselor requested and
resident requested uh escalation
services.
council.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. So, it sounds like
we're going to be implementing um and
when will that be implemented, Rob?
>> So, I'll ask I'll start asking for input
today. Uh and we'll be able to implement
on June 29th.
>> Awesome. And then the other piece is
because we've had a bit of a
conversation on this as well. Sometimes
it's not just one problem repeat
offender in the neighborhood. Sometimes
it's like one particular street or one
particular section of a street. I see
nodding heads in the room cuz you know
what I'm talking about because it's the
broken window syndrome, right? If one
repeat offender can get away with it,
then the next uh repeat offender will
also practice the same thing. So, can we
also recommend potentially pockets of
neighborhoods where there is a cluster
of a of the same problem?
>> Absolutely. if it's just a a street in
specific or a group of streets. Uh and
then beyond uh what is identified either
through the data or through the
recommendations, the officers are
dedicated to that ward pairing during
that time.
>> So if they run out of the suggestions,
they will continue with uh enforcement
throughout the remainder of their
assignment.
>> Fantastic. And and not to and so we're
all going to be very excited to see that
happen. Um, and Jim earlier brought up a
really good point which I know Rob
you've shared in the past as well and
council pointed it out too. There have
been improvements and you can see from
the report there have been improvements
is the statistics of of 2% complaints
and then what was the stat on the
parking Laura 65 or whatever percent
increase in the number of fines. So,
while there have been improvements after
18 months of implementing this pilot and
growing it now across the city, um we
are catching up. Right. Right. Rob, you
framed it to me in this almost the same
way that Jim framed it.
>> Absolutely. I I can give you a quick
rundown with enhancements thanks to Jim
just to make sure that we do get that.
Uh the parking was 2% increase with
tickets up 50% and parking fines up
173%. Right.
>> Property standards and municipal calls
are up 26%
uh with tickets up 92% and fines are up
143%.
The discrepancy between the tickets
going up and the fines going up is
partly representative of our graduated
penalties and demonstrative of us uh
capturing those repeat offenders.
Towing is up 201%, again we tow repeat
offenders and it's up significantly.
Um and and it was also uh indicated that
uh we don't bring all the stats to
council, but what we bring is to
demonstrate that we are trending in the
right direction after 18 months of a
36-month process.
>> Thank you, Robin. through the chair. And
to Jim's point, it's just there's a lot
to catch up on. And there's a lot and
and what sticks out the most for
residents and and for me too when I'm
doing walkarounds in neighborhoods are
the repeat offenders are the ones that
the residents have to we have to keep
calling in, get that escalated to our
office. Those are the ones that stick
out the most. And when those stick out
the most, it feels like nothing's
happening and nothing's changing. So I
think hopefully some of the proactive
work and the motions that were passed
and referred to staff from the
delegations will also be help us move us
forward, continue moving forward as
well. And then finally, madame clerk, I
just have two changes to the
recommendations in the report. If we
could put it up on the screen.
Okay. So, the report I is to receive the
report and also that staff be directed
to engage with the city of Edmonton and
review comparable municipal best
practices related to problem properties
and repeat offenders and report back on
options for potential implementation in
the city of Bmpton and also that staff
be directed to advocate to the
appropriate provincial ministries for
legislative changes to address
identified barriers as requested. So
those barriers include our inability at
in the province of Ontario to create a
subclass property tax bracket to deal
with problematic properties in the same
way that Alberta does. So that's just
one example and that is just the amended
uh recommendations to the report. Thank
you very much.
>> Thank you [snorts] councelor Santos.
Councelor Power speaking to the motion.
>> Thank you Mr. Chair. Rob, can you just
explain for the public what's the
difference between this proactive
approach versus the last proactive
approach?
So, this was what was uh specifically
requested is that the ward pairings have
direct input into it. Uh, one of the
things I did note when I looked at the
the top five properties in each ward
pairing is that some of the ones that
the counselors have spoken to us about
are not in that top five. That doesn't
make them any less important. In fact,
the the community is raising them. They
are of significant importance. So, what
this will do, it'll give us another
pathway to direct our pro proactive
efforts.
Thank you, councelor Power. Councelor T.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um, I just like to
when the when the vote comes up, I'd
like to vote separately on uh all those
three items that I see on the screen
here. I'm happy to support the receiving
the interimm update report. Um, staff
have been doing a good job on their
enforcement. I like in WS 9 and 10. just
generally speaking of enforcement, not
particularly to RL. Um, you know, we
don't seem to have we don't seem to have
concerns that are not addressed. So, I'm
happy to receive that report and and see
that they've done a thorough job in
highlighting um the numbers in the
report um and and dividing them up in
terms of uh call volumes or uh new
licenses um bringing properties into
compliance, all those different metrics
there. So happy to receive that, but uh
I'm not supportive of uh a direction to
engage with the city of Edmonton or
other municipalities to see what they're
doing. Uh and I'm not uh going to be
advocating to the provincial government
to create a subclass of properties uh as
well. So I I'll be voting against those
two items. Thank you.
>> Thank you very much, councelor Tur. So,
I will request that we first consider
the motion moved by councelor Santos at
the report prepared by Allison Sander,
manager of special projects and
administration in legislative services
to our committee of council meeting of
June 17th, 2026 regarding the
residential rental licing program
interim update be received. All in
favor? That carries. And next item that
staff be directed to engage with the
city of Edmonton and review comparable
municipal best practices related to
problem properties and repeat offenders
and report back on options for potential
implementation in the city of Bmpton.
Who is in favor? Who is against?
>> I'm opposed to it. So noted by the clerk
and that staff be directed to advocate
to the appropriate provincial ministries
for legislative changes to address
identified barriers as required. Who is
in favor? And who is against?
>> Opposed to it.
>> The clerk has noted and so the three
motions carry with noted opposition.
And so with that, members of committee,
I will ask of your indulgence for us to
receive a a delegation from Pushkar
Chavan, Bmpton resident, regarding the
third hospital required for Bmpton. I
understand
Mr. Chavan has one of our youngest
residents accompanying him here today.
And so that is why we are moving this
delegation up.
Welcome.
>> Welcome Pushkar.
>> Uh thank you. Uh thanks for giving this
opportunity. I have uh Amit Pumar um
whom I'll be talking about a little
later. I have uh for this delegation
Atul Jani, Prashant and Jetu with me. So
um you know I wanted to um have this
delegation for the third hospital and uh
you know during my research and when you
know we were talking about the topics.
Uh this is the first point I wanted to
call out right uh what I realized is
there are few cases which I wanted to I
want to make sure that you know this uh
office hears about it. uh that is of
Amit Kumar right and this is all
concerning with the case of third
hospital or even the second hospital now
uh Amit Kumar's wife was admitted on May
8th uh for her uh delivery of second
child okay
um unfortunately there was a
complication uh on sepsis
uh during her delivery
um and after a few days she was
discharged.
>> Mr. Chavan, I will ask you just to pause
for a moment while we wait for folks who
are attempting to leave the chambers to
be able to do so.
>> Sure. If
>> we could pause the clock
>> and if I can ask for quiet please.
>> Mr. Chavan please.
>> Yeah. So, I'll correct myself. It was
May 9th. Um, and on May 9th, she
delivered uh a beautiful boy. Um, and on
May 11th, uh, she was discharged. Um,
and with symptoms of with early symptoms
of sepsis. Okay. Um throughout this um
hospitalization she was not administered
any antibiotics
or apart from being advised to take
Tylenol and Advil whenever her pain
reoccurs.
On May 12th,
she they again came into the emergency
ward uh with complaints of uh severe
about abdominal pain and um that night
um you know they were again told that
she is fine and they can go back home.
After 2 days
uh she again came into the emergency
ward wherein she bred her last
on that particular day after 2 days.
Okay.
All this while there were no antibiotics
given to her.
And we can all attribute this issue with
lack of doctors, lack of overwhelmed uh
you know doctors, lot of people coming
into emergency ward.
But
somebody being in such a situation and
not being prescribed antibiotics when
the body itself cannot fight, it's a
sheer criminal activity.
I will first of all I will request this
office to help with an inquiry or a
inquest for her death during the
funeral. Now the second part during the
funeral of Miss Priya Sharma her father
who you know was in India could not
visit uh this place for the funeral died
of a brain stroke when watching her
funeral live.
So you can imagine what the family has
gone through. I'm like none of us in
this auditorium would like to have any
of your friends even associated with us
or our family going through this.
I'm like
this is something that I wanted to
discuss um as my first point and
all this while he's been requesting the
hospital to provide some consideration
or some child care help. He got none.
Uh, councelor Bra has been very helpful
to, you know, initiate a kind of a food
bank service or something that can help
this family.
Okay. Um to to keep in mind that you
know this family also had the second
partner Priya Sharma who was helping to
raise his family.
uh equally right so that part of income
is gone. So financially also along with
emotional they are all distressed right.
So I thank Miss Bra uh to help here.
Uh
this is Nan Kumar
you want to say something.
[snorts]
Good afternoon everyone and thank you
for the time.
My name is Amit Kumar. I stand before
you today as a husband who lost his
[snorts]
>> I'm sorry I don't know if I can talk.
[snorts]
I may ask committee for additional time.
Carrie.
>> Yeah. Um you want to sit down? Can sit
down? Have a glass one.
Thank you.
Coming back to my uh topic of uh the
third hospital, right? I think we all
are we are we all are you know u we know
that we require the third hospital or
the second hospital to be done as fast
as possible. Right? We wanted to know
know the status exactly what status has
been as you know is for the second and
third hospital. We've been trying to get
in touch with the MPP our local MPP by
and we have a appointment with uh Mr.
Sakaria by end of this uh month. Uh so
that you know because we know that there
is a portion that city helps 10% and 90%
comes from the state government or the
provincial government. So you wanted to
know that how city has been following up
uh of uh you know making sure that we
have the second hospital and the third
hospital on time.
Uh we have also heard reports where now
the local clinics in Bmpton are being
directed to refer patients only to
Bmpton Civic Hospital and not Missaga
Hospital or Georgetown Hospital. And we
have u like we we did not get time to
click photos and present it here but we
do have heard those of those cases. So
that's my uh third question. Is there
any directive given from the city in
that respect?
My fourth one is why there is no MRI
center in Paramton.
Is it being planned along with the
second or third hospital?
And the fifth one right and this is
something that Amit told us and many
people told us right that whenever we
visit a civic hospital Bmpton civic
hospital
the equipments that have been certified
as audited are broken.
they are not working. So I will request
this office to do a re audit for those
equipments or to do reit of the
auditors.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you Mr. Chavan. I do have
speakers. Mayor Brown.
>> Well, thank you for the courage to come
forward today with your delegation and
share your pain and your story. Um I
know you've asked a few questions um and
I'll do my best to respond to them. I
know councelor Ber wants to speak to
this too. First of all, this council um
believes and we passed a motion
unanimously that the protocols and
preparation for sepsis is inadequate um
in Ontario. We passed a motion based on
a family that came in um with an
experience in Credit Valley where they
lost the mother as well. And so we
started a a request to the province to
have this immediately looked into. The
ability to put forward an inquiry on a
provincial agency is is up to the
province because theos hospitals are run
by the province. Um if there was an
inquiry, it would have to be uh the
province that that does that. I suggest
today though we can um put a letter. I'm
happy to pen a letter demanding that
asking for an inquiry into what happened
here. Um there's also the provincial
ombbudsman and auditor general that you
could forward this to. I suggest we
forward what happened here to the
provincial ombbudsman and auditor
general um because this is um a
senseless avoidable um tragedy. In terms
of what we're doing to get additional
healthc care capacity, as mayor, I've
declared um a public emergency twice.
Once during COVID and once in 2019, uh,
councelor Harkuret Singh, now our deputy
mayor, put forward a motion that we
declare a healthcare emergency. And we
did so to really spark conversation at
at at Queens Park. We hope that this
would cause a question at question
period about why we didn't have a second
hospital. Um, and it caused a media
firestorm. It caused the reaction we
wanted. We began the petition, the
largest petition in the city of Bmpton's
history, and we [snorts] got it into the
provincial budget that they committed to
a hospital. That followed with it going
to Treasury Board, and we finally we got
an allocation. Now they've um allocation
of 2.4 billion, largest healthcare
investment in city history. It went to
um an RFP and um the company was awarded
Bird Construction. They did the
ceremonial sod turning last year and I'm
told we're going to be in full
construction sometime between July and
September. Uh this will have uh this new
hospital will have um uh a full service
emergency department. It will have up to
350 beds funding initially for 250. Um
it's going to have a section on youth
mental health, uh seniors care,
Alzheimer's, dementia. Um and so it will
be um uh a step forward. Um our position
to the province though was as much as we
need a second hospital, we even need a
third hospital. The province did tell us
on numerous occasions they will not take
a request for a third hospital until the
second hospital is dealt with and it's
going to take years to build the second
hospital. They won't even take a We've
got land confidentially that we've
identified. They won't even have the
conversation with us. The Minister of
Health has been very clear. We're
premature. We can't submit a submission
on a third hospital yet. Um, but we're
going to continue to make this a focal
point of our advocacy.
I know we're at 100. In 2019, we were at
100% capacity at our hospital. The in is
full every night. The bigger shock would
be if I got a report that it wasn't at
100% capacity. Two weeks ago, councelor
Santos gave a speech here where she was
almost in tears about the experience of
one of her loved ones. I get those phone
calls tragically every day. And so,
we're going to continue to badger the
province. Um, we met every, you know,
the requirement in Ontario is you have
to do a 10% local share. Um, you have to
have all the permits approved. We've
done everything. We've done our part.
Um, and so we're going to make sure that
this construction is not delayed any
further. The timetable has already been
delayed. Um and uh I can tell you we are
on it um relentlessly to make sure there
is no further delays when we get the
second hospital built and as soon as the
second hospital's built know that our
number one ask of the province is going
to be a third hospital. I'd also say
this is compounded by failures in the
system across the board. For example, um
federally we don't get any funding for
those who don't have health insurance.
We have a massive operational def
deficit. I think it's north of 50
million at Oller because the people that
come in they take care of are
non-residents and have no health
insurance. So they have to cut other
programs to pay for that. That's a
federal failure. Proincially we're in
gridlock because we have paramedics
lined up but they have carriage of a of
a patient because there's not a
healthcare worker. And so you go I visit
the hospital often and I see um I see
the gridlock. Imagine seeing so many
paramedic um vehicles um lined up and
paramedics waiting with a patient. They
want to go out and they want to go out
and and and and help people that and yet
they're waiting there. Um and so that's
a system failure at a provincial level.
We have challenges with healthcare. Um
and even though it's the number one
budget item in the province, it does not
nearly meet the demand and the
requirements of a modern healthcare
system. And so there are structural
issues and I think unfortunately we're
going to see more tragedies until these
are addressed. But count on us to be
vocal and and make this demand and maybe
and maybe you know an inquiry into this
strategy may be the catalyst um for the
change required. So thank you for being
here and rest assured I will be um
fervent in in in our advocacy on this.
>> Thank you Mayor Brown. Councelor Brown.
>> Thank you through you, Mr. Chair. Um,
thank you, Mayor Brown, for those
comments and echoing a lot of the
comments Mayor Brown has said, but it's
it's really sad to see another case
coming through. And I know there's many
more that have not come to this council
member. So, first of all, condolence to
the family of Priya Sharma, um, who has
lost her life to sepsis, which is, uh,
preventable. And again, we're here again
again here today again. [snorts] And
honestly, no family should ever have to
go through this. Um I I can see Mr.
Kamar over there um tried to delegate.
How could he even, you know, say
anything when this was something that
could have been prevented? And seeing
his six-year-old daughter with his son
here today, it is so sad that this can
ever happen. And as a previous health
care professional,
I've seen I've seen how hard our health
care professionals work, but there are
certain gaps and barriers that we're
facing. So, just like counor brown was
saying, we did bring emotion in for
sepsis. So um the critical gaps in
sepsis whether it's a response for
postpartum um patients but it clearly
states um that we need a transparent
review of the hospital actions um clear
communication of findings and also
meaning thing meaningful corrective
measures I think for the family um they
need to see what was done and what could
have been done and I think um
supporting the referral
and the letter that Mayor Brown has
said, I think, you know, let us know
what you need from us, but I know
council members here today and Mayor
Brown have been advocating for the
second hospital and even the third
hospital because we know without health,
you can't do anything and we've seen
that time after time. So always know we
are here advocating for our health care
system but no always know that the
sepsis bundle which is a mandate in the
US but not is in Ontario. We have
advocated for a sepsis bundle to be
mandated in the in in Ontario to see
where we where we can help save lives.
So thank you again for your advocacy.
Thank you again for coming here because
this is important. We need to hear these
stories because how are we going to
voice our concerns if people don't know?
>> Thank you.
>> Okay. Can you also answer about the
third uh point MRI
>> byton does not have an MRI center.
>> So just if I could respond those are
allocations that are provincial
decisions. The Ministry of Health any
allocation for any healthcare service is
a provincial decision point. Um and so
if you're asking why there's not MRIs
outside the hospital if there is a um
the allocation of those dollars are set
proincially.
>> Thank you very much mayor and thank you
Mr. Chavan and condolences to you Mr.
Kumar. We have a motion of receipt uh
moved by myself and also requesting that
Mayor Brown be requested to write
correspondence in support of the
delegation here today.
Uh sorry councelor this is Jendra I
think one question wasn't answered is
there has there been any directive that
Bmpton Bmptonites have to go to Bmpton
civic only cannot go to Georgetown or
cannot go to credit valley in Missaga
because that's what they are following
>> there's never been a um a directive in
the city of Bmpton we don't have domain
over that um but I've never heard of a
of a provincial directive to that extent
u my understanding is that any Ontario
resident can go to any Ontario hospital
and you have the legal right to and the
Canada Health Act actually guarantees
healthcare access if you're a Canadian
citizen in in any province where it
changes if you're outside Canadian um
borders.
>> Thank you very much, Mayor Brown.
>> So, we have the motion as on the screen.
All in favor? That carries. There are
none opposed.
>> For our next delegation, we're going to
request that we skip to delegation 6.5.
Um, we have
>> ma'am.
We will wait a while.
>> We'll ask for the Don Don delegation to
come down, please.
>> We roll with it.
>> Welcome
>> [clears throat]
>> We do we got people online too.
>> Please proceed. Thank you.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair, mayor and the uh
city council. My name is Jeet Tulsi. I
am vice president of a running club
called the Bmpton Benders and I'm
standing here with my colleagues Pam and
Michelle and we represent about a 100
members or so and um we are planning um
our annual event and it's called the
Dondon Dash. Next uh slide please.
And so I'll tell you a little bit about
the organization, a little bit about the
impact of this organization and um then
we have a few asks at the end of end of
this. So the uh Dondon Dash uh was um
host started to be hosted by the Bmpton
vendors. Um it was named after one of
our members and past employee of um I
think 30 odd years with the city of
Bmpton. And um after he was diagnosed
with ALS, we decided to plan this um
plan this event in his honor. And so um
we have been doing this event for about
13 years or so. Next slide, please.
Um since since 2017,
um so the Dondon Dash has grown
significantly. Uh we've donated uh over
$26,000 to the ALS Foundation. Um we're
going to be hosting it like every year.
We're going to be hosting it again on
September 13th. And um Councelor Santos
is smiling and nodding because um she's
taken part in that event along with uh
Mayor Brown um uh councelor Power and um
of course councelor Singh has helped us
out uh with promotions as well. Um the
event even though we're a running club,
it's open to all ages, all uh people you
know with uh who are walking, running,
um etc. And so we want to make this
inclusive of all BMPonians. Next slide,
please.
The impact has been huge. Um, I'm
listening to some of the previous agenda
items here and it's, you know, parking
and and very uh, you know, uh, I guess
things that could could make you could
that could weigh heavily on you. Running
makes everything better. And I would say
that um, if you have an issue with
parking or property or anything like
that, go for a run or a walk and uh,
you'll feel better right away. Uh, our
club promotes physical activity which
makes everything better again. Um it
promotes the uh disease of ALS. Um it's
volunteer volunteer-led. So all of our
activities
um are you know organized by our
community volunteers. All of our money,
our profits go towards the ALS
Foundation. Next slide please.
Um key metrics. So we've grown 160
161%. So that's very significant. This
is representative of significant
volunteer time and commitment by um us
standing here and uh the rest of the
organization, our community um executive
council etc. And you can see the chart
on the right hand side that shows the
growth. So um and we want to take this
event to the next level. We struggled
with uh raising uh funds and securing
sponsors and with a with a community
like a community organization like this,
we struggled to raise, you know, $10,000
in um in sponsorships. And so, uh we're
trying to increase the awareness of this
event so that we can get more
registrance which leads to more um more
uh more revenue as well as more
sponsorship. So next slide please.
Um very quickly our we reach you know
all different facets of the community.
We are primarily Bmptonians all of the
uh the funds are generated here and and
and goes to the ALS but it's really a
community impact by uh impacted uh to
most um BMTonians. We have very very
high repeat participation that shows the
trust that our um runner is having in
us. Next slide please.
And so what we're asking council today
is uh to promote the to help us promote
the event and um I'm happy to say that
uh council has taken that pick up that
ball and started to run with it. They
have asked us for some for some uh
promotional information that we've
already given. Um, and then the second
thing that uh we're asking for is that
currently we're only allowed to book
Professors Lake Recreation Center, which
is where the race is hosted, uh, 9
months in advance. And so that that
limits us in the time we can uh, you
know, secure sponsorship and start our
planning activities. And we're asking,
and I'm almost done here, we're asking
the the council to um see if we can book
the facility one year one year in
advance. And um thirdly, just to just to
spread the word about the the there's
room in this full here. So hoping to get
um more interest in the race and um
secure more sponsorships. So, if you
know anyone in your uh in your wards, in
your network who would be willing to
support a great initiative like this,
we'd love to hear from you.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you very much, Jeep. I do have
speakers. Councelor Santos.
>> Thank you so much, Mr. Chair. I always
love participating in the Don Dash. I
think last year um we were short of
somebody to lead the warm-up and then I
stepped in and just led the warm-up for
everyone. That was a lot of fun. And I'm
happy to do that again. Also happy to
promote and and share my social media.
Um I think the Dondon Dash is is is very
special and more participants. I'd love
to see more participants in in the race
as well and I am happy to refer your
delegation to staff to take a look at
that exception in terms of the one-year
booking in advance. Um and I know that
commissioners just pointed something
out. So maybe through you, Mr. Chair,
maybe the commissioner wants to respond
>> uh through the chair to councelor
Santos. We've already uh waved that
exception. It will be held on an annual
basis and I believe our rec team has
spoken to the group. So that will be on
a go forward basis.
>> It's already done. There you go. I don't
need to refer it because it's already
done. I like that. Anyway, I will see
you on the 13th. Let me know if you need
someone to do the warm-up.
>> Thank you, Councelor Santos. Mayor
Brown.
>> Yeah. Thank you, Cher Vante. just to say
obviously this this run is dear to the
city. Um and Pam, you know, Don is a
legend in our city. Um we want to honor
him. Um a symbol of a selfless
dedication to others. Most people they
have a diagnosis with ALS, you know,
they would shrink, not try to do
something great and lasting during those
difficult years. And so because this is
a longtime city staff member serving 35
35 years
>> 37
>> 37 years you know I still hear from
sports clubs around the city that you
know Don helped them on this or that. Um
and so just whatever we can do. I'd like
to when we refer this um if I could
refer it to um community services and to
communications sort of like we do with
the BVD um half marathon. Um let's make
sure that communication assets in the
city promote this and whether there's a
digital board that's not being used we
can use to to get word out help drive
registration. I would note this weekend
was also the ALS um race to end um to
walk [snorts] to end ALS and it's
actually an exciting time where there's
a ton of research happening on
neurological disorders. There's actually
research and progress happening and
these type of events are the fuel that
are going to get us to that goal of
ending ALS. And so um I love being
there. I know counselor Power is a
passionate supporter of this uh uh race
as well. Um and so looking to
communications maybe through corporate
support services. Let's see what
additional uh tools we can do to help um
uh drive registration up and awareness.
And so if that could be included in the
in the referral.
>> Thank you very much, Mayor. And uh we
have the referral on the screen. Moved
by councelor Santos also for receipts.
All in favor? That carries. And members
of committee, we do have two more
delegations. Are we uh clear to proceed?
>> Yes. Thank you.
>> Okay. So, we have uh delegation 6.5 from
Amadep Singh, the founder of enabled
talent regarding the Bmpton next program
outcomes and growth of enabled talent.
Welcome Amad.
>> Uh good afternoon respected Mayor Brown,
members of council and city staff. My
name is Amandep Singh, founder and CEO
of Enable Talent. Today I'm pleased to
share my journey as a participant of the
Bmpton X program delivered through
Beehive, which is part of the Bmpton
Innovation District. Enable talent is a
company building technology solutions at
the intersection of accessibility,
employment, education, and workforce
inclusion. What started as an idea in
Bmpton last year has now grown into a
company creating impact across Canada
and internationally. Next slide please.
I moved to Bmpton in February 2025 with
an idea and one of the primary reason
was to participate in the Bmpton next
program through Beehive and the Bmpton
innovation district. I had the
opportunity to work with mentors, attend
programming, refine our business model
and connect with founders, advisers and
ecosystem partners.
Those months gave me the foundation to
turn an idea into a company. More
importantly, that gave me an access to
community that genuinely supports
entrepreneurs and innovation. Next
slide, please.
>> Can I ask for quiet please? Please.
Since then, enabled talent has launched
the workforce inclusion network, a p AI
powered platform designed to connect
people [snorts] with disabilities with
employers, government programmings,
educational institution and community
organization.
Today our platform supports if
>> I may just ask you just to pause one
ensure that we have quorum
>> Emily please. Thank you. Uh today our
platform supports inclusive hiring,
talent development, accessibility
planning, workforce analytics and
community management. What makes me
especially proud is that a company
started is BR in Bmpton is now creating
opportunities far beyond our city. Next
slide please.
[snorts]
Over the past year we have expanded our
work across Ontario and Canada have
begun part building partnerships
internationally. We were only Canadian
company to be selected in UNICEF
supported programs with initiatives in
central and western Africa where we have
our solution deployed in Ghana, Kenya,
Nigeria and Mali with further ministry
approval and discussions underway in
Spain, Germany, France, Central Asia,
Middle East and the Caribbean.
uh for a company that began through a
startup program in Bmpton, these
opportunities have been been incredibly
meaningful. Next slide, please.
Alongside this work, we have been
fortunate to receive several recognition
including the city of Bmpton
accessibility recognition entrepreneur
of the year and also being featured as
uh Canada's top three future of work
companies and also being ranked as the
top number one diversity focused
companies in Canada's. While awards are
never the goal, they are a reminder that
innovation and inclusion can go hand in
hand. Next slide please.
Uh I'm happy to share that we uh
recently deployed this project in Sbury
where we had uh entire ecosystem in
presence and as an request and further
discussion we'll be happy to follow the
same model in Bmpton as well. Next slide
please. Next,
uh, as I conclude, I just want to
emphasize one thing. Even as enabled
talent continues to grow nationally and
internationally, we proudly consider
ourself as a Bmpton rooted company. No
matter where our work takes us, Bmpton
will remain part of our identity and our
home base. And I would like to sincerely
thank to the teams at Beehive uh in West
Bmpton team uh Bmpton entrepreneur
center and the Bmpton venture zone team
and the other members of Bmpton
Innovation District. Building this
company wouldn't have been possible
without their support. There is a
[snorts] saying that great cities are
not measured by the companies they
attract but by the companies they help
create. Bmpton helped create enabled
talent from Bmpton next to Global Next.
Thank you, Bmpton, for being part of
this journey. Thank you very much.
>> Thank you very much, Councelor Power.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um,
Enable Talent is a true Bmpton story.
They came in um as through our
innovation ecosystem. They started out
at Beehive and then gone through, but
the work that they've done throughout
and and as the council rep on the
accessibility committee, I've had the
fortune of working alongside Amadep as
well as Jebby. Um, probably Jebby a
little bit more than Amadep just because
I've known Jebby for 20 years.
Um
these guys are should be highly
commended for what they not only do here
in Bmpton but also globally. Um, and
what they what a lot of people don't
know is they've recently launched a
communication app
across Canada for free and it's
primarily in the autism world and um
they went and they developed this app
where others struggle
um to afford other apps that are out
there. Almond and enabled talent have
built this app and now release it
anywhere in Canada for any user for
free. So their community involvement,
their give back, not only their startup
potential is truly commendable and I and
I applaud you and I I'm proud to see
what you've done and can't wait to see
where you go from here.
>> Thank you.
>> Thank you very much, counselor. I see no
further questions. So I would like to
ask for motion to receive the
delegation. All in favor? And that
carries. And so members, we have one
delegation 6.4
from
>> Madame Clerk.
>> You want the presentation beforehand?
>> We do.
>> We do. Let's do the presentation.
>> Thank you.
>> Welcome. Thank you, Councelor Rosente
and Chair. Good afternoon, Mayor and and
members of council. Joining me today to
give a little bit of report on our
Bmpton X in terms of an update is my
colleague Zabir Partell, who represents
the Beehive. The Bmpton X is a pilot
initiative designed to support newcomer
entrepreneurs and accelerate business
formation in our city. Our city of
Bmpton attracts talented newcomers from
around the world and many arrive with
extensive professional experience,
strong entrepreneurial ambitions and
initiatives for business ideas. However,
despite their potential, they often face
barriers when trying to establish and
scale businesses in Canada. These
barriers can include limited access to
networks, mentorship, financing, market
knowledge, and settlement supports.
Bmpton Next was developed to address
these gaps and to create a structured
pathway that helps newcomers
entrepreneurs transition from potential
to economic contribution. The program
aligns directly with council's
priorities around economic growth,
innovation, inclusion, talent
attraction, and business development.
Next slide, please.
What distinguishes the Bmpton next from
traditional entrepreneurship programs
was its integrated support model. The
pilot combined five elements. First, a
hightouch mentorship provided founders
with direct access to experienced
business leaders and entrepreneur. Two,
second, settlement and family support
address challenges that often impact
founders ability to focus on business
growth. The third was the ecosystem and
access to connected participants to
Bramson's innovation and business
network. The fourth was experience
operators sharing practical guidance
based on real world entrepreneurship
experience.
And finally, localized business
connections helped founders established
relationships with Bmpton's ecosystem.
Together, these components created a
founder centered model that addressed
both businesses and personal barriers to
success. Next slide, please. So, a
little bit about the outcomes. The
results of the pilots demonstrated the
value of intentional support for
entrepreneurial talent. Through Bmpton
Next, we supported 121 newcomer
entrepreneurs. More than 400 hours of
one-to-one business mentorships were
delivered. participants received 200
hours of individual settlement support.
The program also assisted 140 family
members recognizing that successful
settlement contributes directly to
successful entrepreneurship.
Most importantly, these founders
established 77 businesses and created 95
jobs here in Bmpton. These are tangible
outcomes that contributed to economic
growth, local employment, and increased
business activity across our community.
The pilot also reinforced Bmpton's
position as a city that welcomes and
supports entrepreneurial talent from
around the world. Next slide, please.
The impact of the program is perhaps
best demonstrated through the successful
participants and founders. Next slide.
Diccastro, an Italian family bakery
entering the Canadian market,
successfully expanded and now operates
two location, employs 2, sorry, 25
people and generates approximately $1.3
million in annual revenue. trips, an
African mobility technology company
entering North America, established its
headquarters here in Bmpton and has
secured a project value of approximately
a half a million dollars. And you just
heard from one of our special members
and in enable talent. This technology
platform focused on accessibility and
workforce inclusion, overcame early
communication and scaling challenges,
and has now grown to over 20,000 users
while building international
partnerships.
These are the examples illustrate the
diversity of the business support
through the program and demonstrated how
strategic intervention can help
transform entrepreneurial potential into
measurable economic impact. Next slide,
please.
As we reflect on the pilot, several
important observations have emerged.
First, global entrepreneurial talent
will choose Bmpton when intentional
support systems are in place. Secondly,
early stage intervention accelerates
business formation and economic
participation.
Third, strong innovation ecosystems
require more than just a program alone.
They require infrastructure, networks,
mentorship and community support. And
finally, sustainable investment is and
founder development can continue to to
build long-term regional innovation
capacity and economic resilience.
Looking ahead, there are several
opportunities for future focus,
including scaling founder rec
recruitment, strengthening alumni
engagement, developing sector specific
streams, and expanding partnerships,
which employs academic institutions and
commercialization of of organizations.
Next slide. Is that it? Okay, fun. I
just want to just a bit of a closing
remarks because I know everybody wants
to go for lunch. RamonX has demonstrated
when we're intentional about our support
in terms of entrepreneurial talent, we
create opportunities not only for
individual founders but for the broader
community. The pilot has generated new
businesses, new jobs, new economic
activity while strengthening Bmpton's
reputation as a destination in
innovation and entrepreneurship. I'd
like to thank our partners, our mentors,
and our participants whose contributions
made this pilot successful. Thank you,
mayor and councel.
>> Thank you very much, Erica. I don't see
any questions. So, I have a motion of
receipt from councelor Bar. All in
favor? That carries. And next, members
of committee, we will move to delegation
6.4 Four from Zed Etlib, the senior
director of the Bmpton Venture Zone by
TMU regarding the Bmpton Venture Zone
2026 updates. Welcome.
>> Good afternoon, Mayor, Chair, members of
council. I'm Zetlib, senior director of
Bmpton Venture Zone. I want to provide
you an update for 2026. Uh, next slide,
please. So, Bmpton Venture Zone is
purpose-driven non-equity uh incubator
helping tech startups grow and thrive in
Bmpton. So what does that mean for
entrepreneurs? We provide validation and
credibility, partnerships and funding
opportunities, expertise and mentorship
across a range of important topics,
support and community by making them
part of the Bmpton venture zone and part
of the TMU zone learning as well as uh
the Bmpton innovation district. Uh next
slide please. The agenda for today is I
wanted to give you a brief overview of
the programming we've done as well as
the community engagement that we have
planned. Next slide.
So um we're very proud to run the
innovator program for 2026 which is a
focus on Bmpton residents around
supporting aspiring entrepreneurs get
into entrepreneurship. So if you have
somebody who has an idea around agentic
AI around kind of non non- sector
agnostic solutions we kind of provide
them the mentorship the guidance so they
can take their idea into a formalized
concept and grow into a company. Um and
we're very proud to say that we have 95%
BMPON resident uh representation in the
program. Next slide.
We have our flagship program which is
the launch program where we're focusing
on digital health. The idea being we
want to capitalize on the TMU assets
that we have through the school of
medicine as well as kind of the city's
mandate around improving healthcare. And
so we have 10 startups. We had 115
applicants. So 47% increase from last
year and we're awarding about $90,000.
Next slide.
I wanted to highlight a few of the
companies that we have in our cohort. Um
we have Oakwood B Oakwood Biology which
is founded by a TMU medical school
student developing a surgical device. Um
we have Diextra which is founded by uh
Bmpton practicing endocrinologist
developing a tool to support his
patients around diet management. And we
have LBX Bio uh a group of Bmpton
residents in biotech developing a
lowcost point of care liquid biopsy
platform to speed up the uh detection of
cancer. Next slide.
So uh some of the additional partners
that we have. Next slide.
So we've been fortunate to have a great
group of partners around the Bmpton
venture zone within Bmpton within TMU
and the broader ecosystem to support our
startups and the community itself. Next
slide.
So just to highlight some of our alumni.
So throughout the program, six years of
Bmpton ventures zone's been around,
we've supported over 130 companies.
Mammon biomed or Bmpton residents
developing a neo-free fertility drug
delivery tool. Transify has done great
work with the city of Bmpton. Um
Tenomics has gone off to raise
significant amount of capital and really
developed their technology um across
North America. Next slide.
So in regards to events for 2026, we've
already hosted 20 events through the
Bmpton Venture Zone, supported 11
ecosystem events. We've had 1,400 Bmpton
residents attend these events. We've had
immense amount of uh digital impact with
almost three over 300,000 people kind of
interact with the content generated out
of the Bmpton Venture Zone. And so we're
very proud of that. Next slide.
And so just to highlight some of the
events that we do, we're focusing on a
woman who build series to help
mentorship for women entrepreneurs. We
do a BMT Bmpton tech talk series with
the Bmpton library. We do ramp up events
where we bring industry experts to kind
of showcase various elements of
knowledge like IP um cyber security to
residents so they can get immersed and
we support a number of ecosystem events
as well. Next slide.
So we wanted to highlight uh that
September 10th we have our flagship
event um the Bmpton Venture Expo uh
where we're going to be showcasing
panels around health tech, cyber
security, defense, robotics and
investment. Next slide.
And so it's going to we're hope we're
anticipating this year we'll have 1,500
attendees. We're going to have four
great panels. We're going to be doing uh
a pitch competition for over 70k in
prizes. So we're very excited about
that. uh we'll have a startup zone to
showcase the various innovations within
BMPON and we're going to have an
innovation zone where we're going to
have a number of workshops. So last year
we had 1,300 people attend and we had
over 400,000 interactions with the
content generated out of that
conference. Uh next slide.
Um and so our request to city council I
believe to residents is their attendance
at this event. It's free of charge and
so we'd be very excited for everybody to
come out and to complete I'd like to
thank council for being leaders in
innovation um and really making Bmpton a
place for entrepreneurs to thrive and
economic development for being such an
immense support to us and really opening
the door for entrepreneurs in Bmpton. So
thank you. Thank you very much, Shazade,
and uh our thanks to you and to your
Bmpton Venture Zone for all of the
tremendous work that you're doing, an
impressive sequence of uh work that
you've been responsible for, and we
thank you for enhancing Bmpton. Now, I
do have a motion moved by councelor by
Mayor Brown to receive your delegation.
All in favor? That carries. And members
of committee, we now have an added
delegation from Sylvia Roberts in
regards to item 12.2.5,
procurement bylaw. Sylvia, are you
there?
>> Good morning, city council. My name is
Sylvia Roberts. I'm resident of 43. Um,
this this new purchasing bylaw has
several major changes that will reduce
transparency to the public. I recognize
that it talks about how for council in
moving to a quarter a moving to from a
quarterly report to every half a year
will make it easier for staff and I
recognize that and it also talks about
how if we move to not include renewals
this is fine for council because it's
about the newer contracts and
So part of the issue is because Branson
is actually quite heavy on renewals in
his contracts. Sometimes renewals can be
a majority of the length of the contract
of the potential contract and frequently
they're taken that having using
a uh not including the renewals
uh is no longer necessary in or in the
report. And when combined with the move
to every half a year for a public
perspective, this can significantly
reduce transparency,
I would suggest that council seriously
reconsider this section of the purchase
bylaw. I I don't think staff meant
anything at words,
but when you combine these factors
and how Bmpton does not seem to be
typical and how it how much it heavily
favors contract renewals.
I I think there are some legitimate
concerns about this that the city may
want to reconsider
and understand how it affects
transparency.
Thank you. That's my delegation.
>> Thank you very much to Sylvia even in a
recording form. Thank you for your
advocacy always. I have a motion moved
by councelor Bar to receive the
delegation.
All in favor? That carries. and members
of committee. Uh, at the request of the
mayor who may need to go to another, uh,
duty, I'm going to skip ahead to item
9.3.1,
discussion item at the request of Mayor
Brown, tribute to officer Taran Bali.
Mayor Brown.
>> Thank you. Um, uh, Chair Vasante, um,
hoping the council can adopt this motion
unanimously. Um, we had a hero on life
lose his life while serving to protect
us. Um, Constable Teran Bali um had
signed up for a a backfill in Northern
Ontario, grew up dreaming of being a
police officer. um and during that extra
work that he signed up for um lost his
life protecting um the public and um I
think it would be appropriate just like
they're doing in the city of Missaga to
name a park in his honor. I've spoken to
the family and to the uh police and they
thought this was a beautiful way to
remember his legacy forever. Um and that
the motion reads that park staff meet
with um the family find an appropriate
location. I believe they're meeting
Friday is if this motion is is passed
and then it'll come back to council. I
actually want to add a third item in
here and that would be um 1, two, and
three. Councelor Power came into my
office this morning with a I thought
another beautiful suggestion and um that
is that we name a citizenship award for
an officer each year in the name of
Teran Valley. Here's a person who is a
son of Bmpton, grew up in Bmpton, loved
the city. I spoke to his I was at the
visitation yesterday and I spoke to his
um his wife and she said he told her he
never wanted to move out of Bmpton. He
loved Bmpton.
This is a they're two families that just
you know they live breathed our our
city. Um and it's just this is an
example of one of the just a great a
great guy an extraordinary individual.
And so it's it's tough to to accept this
news. It's tough to process this news
and I can't imagine um you know two
police officers lost in a week
protecting the public
and his father a shock. I I know well I
know councelor Bar and councelor Blesie
um know him. I believe the deputy mayor
knows the the wife's family. It's just
we're all this is a big city but we're
connected. It's a big city but we're you
know just when when there's pain like
this we we feel it. And so hope that we
can unanimously pass this motion. Um and
just to say as I said to the father we
will never forget your son. This city
will never forget your son.
>> Thank you very much Mayor Brown. So, we
have the motion on the screen. I'd like
to request a recorded vote.
Last Oh, do we have speaker? Yes.
>> Go ahead, Mr. Tim.
>> Just through the chair, I just hear
hearing the mayor's comments. Did we
want to clarify that the award is for an
officer? Did I hear you say correctly?
>> Yes. One officer.
>> Okay.
Is the direction clear?
Thank you. I'll ask the clerk to
administer the vote.
>> Dear chair Vante for the motion on
screen. All those in favor please rise.
I see councelor Power, Deputy Mayor Sang
Chair Versante, Councelor Keenan, Mayor
Brown, Councelor B, Councelor Santos,
and online councelor Portini. How do you
vote?
>> In favor. And councelor Plesi, how do
you vote?
>> In favor.
>> And councelor Tor, how do you vote?
>> In favor.
>> That is unanimous.
>> That is unanimous. Thank you very much.
And so that uh addresses item 9.3.1. And
I see also staff in the room here to
help us address uh the added discussion
item 9.3.2
with regards to the Santa Claus parade.
Uh we received all of us uh
correspondence from the Santa Claus
parade committee uh a request to provide
space for their costume team in uh our 8
Nelson building. And I believe that
there have been conversations between
the Santa Claus parade and staff. If
staff perhaps could just give us a quick
rundown of what is possible here.
through the chair to councelor Vicente.
Uh so based on the request that we've
received from the Santa Claus parade, uh
they're looking for approximately,000
square ft space uh for storage uh
purposes at the location given the ask
is for a nominal rate agreement. So we
needed uh the direction from council in
order to proceed but staff can take it
back and work with the group and proceed
further.
>> Thank you. And I believe uh the
discussions were in regards to that they
pay for the operational costs. Is that
correct?
>> Yes, that is correct. And so I would ask
committee if we would consider a motion
to provide for that agreement to be
signed by staff with the Santa Claus
parade paying for the operational cost
to use the space at Eden Nelson.
Looking for speakers. Councelor Santos.
>> Thank you through you, Mr. Chair. Love
the Santa Claus parade. Um but the the
building itself has issues with the
elevator and some other issues and I
know that when um we did this for BA it
was on an ASIS basis. So I just just I
before like I I want to set the
expectations
um before we agree to anything um that
the elevator is breaking down that etc
etc in the same way that that we have
informed BA as well. over to Raj to
confirm because if if it's used for
storage the elevator [laughter] is going
to be necessary
>> uh through the chair to councelor Santos
absolutely we have already reached out
to public works and engineering to align
on that requirement and then only we
would proceed and again it would be only
a year-to-year agreement so should there
be any concerns we can definitely work
on terms similar that we have above
>> great because I don't think we're fixing
the elevator anytime soon. So, just want
to make sure folks know that. Okay.
>> Thank you, councelor. Councelor Power.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Do we know what
the operational costs are? Like, are we
talking massive amounts for an empty
building or an empty floor?
>> No.
>> No.
>> Okay. And the elevator? Do you need the
elevator?
>> We're okay.
>> Perfect.
Thank you. Any other speakers? I see
none. So I'll move the motion and also
for receipt of the correspondence that
was added earlier in the meeting. All in
favor? Any opposed? That carries. And so
committee with that uh we have reached
the hour of approximately 1:30. Perhaps
it would be advisable for us to have a
break for all unless there is any
opposition to that idea.
>> Yes. Speakers. Mayor Brown. Yeah. Yeah,
I don't believe there's anyone else
waiting here today for an item on the
public agenda. We're mindful of
everyone's time. I do see um a large
group who's here for Gave. Uh and we
love Gave. Um but that is an inc camera
item and so I just hope there's an
understanding that um I don't want you
to waste your time. uh an inc camera
item um is not uh there's no public role
there and maybe you just speak to the
city solicitor so there's understanding
of what we're allowed to discuss in
public and what we're allowed to discuss
in in camera my preference is we discuss
everything we can in public but I think
there's some some rules under the
municipal act for this um and so when we
have this many seniors waiting hours and
hours um I just want to make sure you
understand what the rules are
>> I think the city solister respond to
that.
>> Yes, through you uh Mr. Chair uh to the
mayor. Um yes indeed this is a matter
that is uh appropriate for in camera. I
I understand the um the idea uh the need
for transparency given the delegation um
and we are very supportive obviously of
gave uh I I don't mind some if they want
to make a request the guideline would be
that that the terms of the lease remain
confidential. Um but um I think that's a
very tricky thing to do. So uh in
general uh this would be more
appropriate to be in camera and and uh
absolutely we need to uh make sure we
have a completed package. So it should
remain in camera at this time.
>> Okay. Uh that's understanding. If I
could just say to those who have waited
maybe this might take a few more hours
and so I'm sensitive of your of your
time. Um but I did walk into the meeting
that councelor Keenan and councelor
Maduros were in where they met you and I
think they solved all the problems
except for one or two that are beyond
our scope. Um but uh um you've got great
advocates in councelor Keenan and
Maduros and hopefully we can solve 70%
of it. But if you want to stay and hear
the results afterwards, you're welcome
to. But it could be a few hours. Okay.
Thank you very much, Mr. Mayor. So I
will ask that we
recess
until 2 p.m.
>> Thank you. Moved by Councelor Santos.
Carried. All
Members of committee, we will now resume
our committee of council. Our next item
is item 7.1, government relation
matters. I held this in order for us to
ask staff to provide us with a brief um
summary of an upcoming events being held
by our friends at Metroinks. They will
be conducting their uh public
information center for the transit and
rail project assessment process. This is
actually quite a historic uh pick that
is taking place here at city hall on
Wednesday, June the 24th from 6:00 to
8:00 p.m. in the Bmpton City Hall
atrium. Um this pick and uh the transit
rail project assessment process will
finally allow for uh full study along
the Kitchen line from Bremly GO to the
Georgetown go and enables all day
two-way go implementation with increased
frequencies. And so I thought it would
be important for us here to be aware but
also for members of the public to be
aware of this opportunity. And so I
would ask staff if they can provide us
with a brief summary
>> through the chair. Thank you councelor
Vicente. I have Doug Rer on the line
that can give us an overview. We will be
attending of course because it's a very
important event and we want to make sure
that um we hear feedback from the
public, but I'll I'll let I'll turn it
over to Doug to see if he can just give
you a brief overview as well as if you
have any questions.
Doug, are you there?
>> Muted.
Doug, are you able to hear us?
>> There he is.
>> Yes, I am. Sorry, I I was unable to mute
there for a m a moment. Um Um Thanks
very much. Yes, counselor. Um as you
[clears throat] as you said, um
Metroinks is developing plans to expand
the rail corridor between uh basically
Braley uh station and Georgetown. Um,
and they're going to need this expansion
in order to uh increase that GO train
frequency and ultimately deliver, you
know, true two-way all day go uh train
service through downtown Bmpton. Um, and
these uh public information centers are
an integral part of the process that
will eventually lead to that level of
service. So, this is just this the start
of it. We understand that they're going
to be um uh running a number of of
TRPAPs uh processes in order to deliver
this um and this is this will be the the
first one um and it'll be important for
the for the public to attend these
public information centers uh to ensure
that their voices are heard um as
Metroinks advances this work and as
Heidi mentioned um uh staff will be
attending both of the the PAC's both in
in Bmpton and in Georgetown. down in
order to make sure that we're there to
support them through this process as
well.
>> Thank you very much uh Doug and to all
transit staff. Uh want to thank you for
the work that you've been doing
particularly on this file, not just this
term, not just the previous term, but
for terms before that because this has
been really the holy grail that we have
been searching for with respect to
transit service along the goal line. And
thanks to members of council for your
advocacy um at the province to enable
this study to now be taking place and
for this opportunity for the public to
engage to take part. And so just a
reminder that Metroinks will be holding
their public information center to
advance their transit and rail project
assessment process. It'll be happening
on Wednesday, June the 24th from 6:00 to
8:00 p.m. here at Bmpton City Hall in
the atrium. Be there. And I don't know
if any members have any further
questions with respect to the government
relations matter. If not, I have a
[snorts] motion moved by councelor Power
to receive the report from staff. All in
favor? And that carries. And so with
that, we now move forward to item 8.2.3
held by councelor Plesi. staff report on
the budget amendment and request to
begin procurement for Bmpton City Hall
elevators and replacement here in ward
one. It's actually ward three.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. Um in speaking to
the elevator replacement in ward three.
>> Yes.
>> Um
I see some of the issues that um that
have have been identified in the report.
I can't pull up the report for some
reason, but it is another issue. Um, can
I just get an understanding as to why um
why is it the whole replacement of the
elevator and and if it's life cycle then
uh it is uh obviously we don't want
anybody stuck in an elevator and there
was two occurrences. Who am I speaking
to? I'm sorry. Public works. Yeah. Okay.
Sorry, Peter. um if if if that's what
the issue is and and it and it is a
replacement of the elevator and it's
just one elevator as opposed to uh what
I in particular members of of council
have been um advocating for was the uh
new reader new new buttons. Um, can you
kind of walk me through why the whole
replacement as opposed to um just like a
mechanism fix or fixing whatever is
needing uh to be fixed?
>> Absolutely. Through the uh chair to
councelor Plesi. [clears throat]
So, as you've noted, the elevators uh we
have been experiencing ongoing uh delays
and issues. Um so security services has
taken several steps along with our
facilities team including replacing the
card readers, interface boards, power
supplies and applying software and and
firmware updates. Um despite these
efforts, the issue hasn't been fully
resolved and the in investigations
completed so far suggest that
[clears throat] the delay is uh is uh
due to the interaction between aging
elevator control technology and your
access control systems. So all three of
those elevators were uh put in place in
in 1988,
so approximately 38 years ago. And uh as
such um the components, [clears throat]
the electrical and such need to be
replaced. We're not going to be
replacing the the cab or the box of the
elevator or the rails. Uh but the rest
of the elevators are going to be
replaced.
>> So as in rails, braking system, pulleys,
what if it's a pulley system? Um and
then all the like the hardware piece of
it.
>> Correct.
>> Okay. Um and it's only one elevator
>> through the chair to council plesi. It's
all three.
>> It is all three.
>> Yes.
>> So not to prolong anything. Um the way
the uh that
um the building was built um was for
eventually those elevators to go down to
the basement or to garage
if the or is it the other if we did a um
a an extension of that building and does
that come into any play in speaking with
the with the builder of this of this
building originally?
Um he said the way it was constructed uh
was for at future expansion that mainly
involved the elevator system uh around
the elevator system to be able to where
those elevators were it could it could
service both the expansion and the
non-expansion or the and the existing is
there an opportunity for us to then look
at um uh having those elevators more of
a full service or even extending adding
onto elevators
>> through the chair. Perhaps I'll ask our
uh director of building design and
construction to provide a little bit
more detail on on that. We will be
hiring a design builder as part of this
procurement process. Um so certainly if
that hasn't been considered, we'll have
them uh evaluate those options. When you
Okay. while the um the individual is
coming up. Uh you said that the card
readers had been replaced
because I've seen card readers replaced
in other areas of the bu of the building
and it's an actual it's a piece it's a
box that is mounted over top of the old
reader when these elevators don't have
that.
>> Did we actually go internal and behind
the readers and we replace that?
Jason,
>> that's correct, counselor. Uh, we've
replaced all the software plus the
hardware behind the card reader.
>> Um, and as Peter had mentioned, the
compatibility with the existing
technology or the new technology and the
age of the uh, elevators are not
compatible.
>> Okay. And I am not an elevator repair
anything. Um, but I did have the
opportunity to um have a chat with
somebody that was and explain to him
what the issues were and what how he
explained to me uh the fix was nowhere
near what we're looking at doing. Um, so
I
No, I'm not going to bring him in.
That's soul sourcing. I don't want
anything to do with that.
Um, you have somebody else coming up
about the
through the chair council pal just to um
>> and if you don't know sorry Peter if you
don't know about like the history of the
building and and call John Cuchola phone
him ask him what he was talking about
and maybe
>> I'm not I'm not telling you to do
something I'm asking you I'm sorry the
way that that came off can you phone him
and ask him um to see what he was
referring to about if we were to extend
the building and how the how he built
the existing building with the elevator
Can we do that and then just come back?
Perfect.
>> Good. Okay. So, and I I'm not going to
stop this report, let it go. It'll go to
the minutes of council next week where
I'll pull it if I can just put a note on
p I'll pulling that and uh or separating
it and then um um hopefully you have
question answers to my questions by
then. Thanks. Thank you.
>> Thank you, councelor. Seeing no further
speakers, I have a motion moved by
councelor Plesi to receive the report.
All in favor? That carries. And next
we're going to item 8.2.5
held by councelor Keenan. Staff report
request to begin procurement and budget
amendment for HD and recreation center
and library. Councelor Keenan, do you
still have questions?
>> Uh no, I'd like to just move the report.
I got my questions answered offline.
Thank you.
>> Thank you very much. So we have a motion
moved by councelor Keenan or if we could
ask councelor Power to move the report.
>> Councelor Plesi has questions. Yes, sir.
Uh sorry I wasn't awarded the
opportunity to have that discussion. Um
I'm I'm not sure I going going through
the report I see that the the more money
being allocated. Um, but I thought that
how was taken care of through previous
I'm not sure why the added
the added dollar amounts. Could ask
staff to clarify
>> through the chair. Um, what this report
essentially does is it's advancing a
previously approved $30 million from
2027 that was from the library portion.
It's advancing it into 2026 because the
current design of the building is it's
an integrated building. So, uh both the
the recreation uh center and and the
library are going to be built under one
one tender
>> seems to be a
what is the overall cost of all
construction that is going into Howen
>> to the chair? Uh 80 $80.4 4 million is
the the project authority for this
>> 80.4. So there isn't an 18 on top of
that that was previously spent and
previously budgeted for and there isn't
an additional 40.
>> No, the 80 million covers um the entire
project budget.
>> The 80.4 is in is is total. We're
borrowing 40 of the 80.
>> Correct.
>> Okay.
No, we're not.
>> Mark,
>> sorry. Through the chair. Uh, thank you,
Councelor Plesi. Um, we're we're asking
for the authority to potentially borrow.
Um, the plan was we had a $30 million in
2027. We're advocating to levels of
government. We also have some tax money
that we have earmarked to come in 2027.
So, we're waiting for that, but the
project's ready to go.
So, we want to get the project moving.
We think all those things are going to
happen like the tax money will come in.
We're still advocating even through this
DCRP to put this project on. So, that
that funding we believe is is coming. If
for some reason this doesn't happen, the
the funds don't come at that point will
come back to council and we'll have to
recommend borrowing.
>> Okay. So, you do state that in borrowing
um council approve a borrowing strategy.
Um, does that need to be changed to say
that you need to come back
>> or is it I don't see it.
>> We We do need to come back.
>> You will come back.
>> We're We're We're actually not changing
the funding source to to borrowing.
Okay.
>> We don't get it. You're coming back.
>> We are coming. We have We have to come
back. Yes.
>> Um there's the 10 and the nine that
What? Sorry, what did you refer to about
what's in 2027?
>> 2027 was uh $30 million. uh 20 million
was federal provincial and 10 million
was our funding and so we're moving that
forward here
>> but you don't have a budget for 2027
>> correct that's why we have the borrowing
as the back stop if something
>> that's what you're boring you're you're
boring okay now I understand
thank you very much for coming
>> well thank you very much councelor
Plesie for your questions very good I
will ask councelor power to move the
report. All in favor? And that carries.
Um, madame clerk, do we have any
questions from members of the public for
any of the sections so far today?
>> We do have uh questions about the bylaw
enforcement. Would you like to ask that
at the general question time?
>> Okay. And so with that, that now takes
us to
the end. Uh, and we now move into close
session.
>> Where's my
>> Where's my
>> 8.3
>> 8.3 moved asked for by councelor Pleshi.
My apologies, council. That's okay. Uh,
thank you, Mr. It's been a It's been a
heck of a day, that's for sure. Um,
we've lost some numbers on the way, I
see.
Um, members of committee, uh,
I'm going to put a motion. Um, and I'm
just letting you know that this motion
is coming next council meeting and I
really want staff to have a look at it.
It's because of the fluctuation of of
fuel prices. I want to try and see if we
can protect oursel in some way um with
with the uncertainties of the future.
Um, you know, it was clear that when the
federal government removed the uh
provincial road or federal excise tax
and the provin province removed the
provincial road tax that did absolutely
nothing for fuel pricing. Um, because it
literally went down and then shot up
before the end of the week to record
highs. Um, I think we need to work with,
you know, Metroinks is undertaking an
indexing uh for for fuel and fuel
consumption. Um, so I' I'd like to see
if we can just I I just wanted to put it
on the floor uh for next week. Uh get it
in staff's hands. Um, it's ultimately
asking staff to do some work on it
before it comes back, but if you have
any suggestions on if you want to make
changes to the motion, please let me
know. Um, and then I'll put that on the
floor next week. Thank you, uh, Mr.
Chair.
>> Thank you very much, councelor Councelor
Power.
>> Sorry. Through you, Mr. Chair, do we
have a motion?
>> Yes, that's where we're
>> That's right. It's right in front of me
clearly.
>> No.
Can we do we need to display the motion
at this time? Madam clerk,
>> through your chair, this will be a
notice of motion on our council agenda.
Correct.
>> Yeah.
>> Yeah. It'll be printed full in full on
the council agenda. I think this was
just a bit of a heads up that it's
coming
>> and thank you for that. Councelor Plesi,
councelor Santos.
>> Thank you, Mr. Chair. um happy to
support this and looking forward to the
notice and motion coming forward, but I
think we asked this question before
about the impact of the
increase to fuel prices on the city of
Brandon. We received a briefing note, I
believe, from staff in that regard
already had a discussion about the
impact on transit as well as the
remaining fleet uh across the city. So,
I don't know if there's already
information there that
um that we can use, but happy to I guess
see the notice of motion next week when
it when it shows up.
>> Thank you very much, councelor Santos.
So, with that, I'll ask for council
question period for public works. Are
there any questions? Seeing none, madame
clerk, do we have questions from members
of the public?
>> No public questions that I moves us
through community services section. Are
there any questions from council?
No. Are there any questions from members
of the public with regards to community
services?
>> Your chair, not at this time.
>> Thank you. And now we go through
legislative services. All items were
dealt with. Are there any questions from
members of council? Seeing none, are
there any questions, Madam Clerk, from
members of the public?
>> To your chair, not at this time.
>> And that brings us to economic
developments. Are there any questions
from council? Seeing none, are there any
questions for members of the public?
Madam Clerk,
>> through your chair, not at this time.
>> Thank you. And so then that we go to
corporate services section. All items
were dealt with. Do we have any members
asking questions? Seeing none, are there
any me questions from members of the
public? Madam Chair,
>> dear chair, no questions at this time.
>> Thank you. And so that brings us to
public question period. Madame clerk, do
we have questions from members of the
public for any item discussed on today's
committee?
>> You chair. We've received the um
following question by email um from Edel
Rafinan.
Um, if parking infractions more often
occur on residences that have rental
units and the landlords take in tenants
with cars which they don't have
sufficient parking space for.
>> I'm sorry, what what is the precise
question? We understand the situation.
We see it all the time.
I believe he's asking is this the cause
of the parking problem that landlords
take in uh tenants without appropriate
parking spaces.
>> I will ask our commissioner of
legislative services to provide some
insight
>> through you Mr. Chair. Yes, that is one
of the contributing factors.
>> Very good. So, thank you. And so, with
that, we now have completed our public
question period. And so, our next item
of business is close session. I will ask
the clerk to outline the items to be
dealt with in close session.
>> Dear chair,
uh, our items for close session include
15.1 project update, Chris Gibson
recreation center addition and
renovation.
um with open meeting exception under
section 2392A
E and I of the municipal act 15.3
projects update center for innovation
heritage theater and city lands words 1
and three open meeting exception under
section 2392K of the municipal act 15.4
4 BMPon transit update open meaning
exception under section 2392K of the
municipal act 15.6 project update and
funding request board 4 uh pursuant to
open meeting exception under section
2392K of the municipal act
and added item 15.8 8, Golden Age
Village for elderly long-term lease for
affordable housing. Uh, pursuant to
section 2392C of the municipal act and
the last added item 15.9, a matter
regarding an identifiable individual
pursuant to section 2392E of the
municipal act.
>> And thank you, Madam Clerk. And so to
deal with those items, I have a motion
moved by councelor Tour to move into
close session to deal with these items.
All in favor? That carries. We will
recess now and go into close session at
2:36.
Members of committee,
in the continuing interest of
transparency and open government, I will
ask the clerk to report out outcomes
from today's close session business.
Madame Clerk,
>> dear Chair Vicante, um item 15.1 was
considered and direction was given. Item
15.2 was approved on consent and not
considered in close session. The
directions therein are deemed given,
including that the following motion
arise and be considered in open session.
that the commissioner community services
be authorized to execute on behalf of
the corporation of the city of Bmpton an
assignment and assumption of lease
agreement with Premier Rackets Club
Corp. as a signer and Premier Racket
Club's Bmpton Corp as a sneige for the
operations of the Rosali tennis facility
on terms and conditions acceptable to
the CEO and in a form acceptable to the
city solister or designate.
>> Thank you. May I have a movement for the
motion? Moved by councelor Keenan. Any
questions? All in favor? That carries.
>> And further chair, the 15.3 was
considered and direction was given. 15.4
was approved on consent. It wasn't
considered in close session. The
directions therein are deemed given,
including that the following motion
arise and be considered in open session.
That staff be authorized to begin
procurement to retain a consultant as an
owner's adviser with expertise in
engineering, construction, and contract
administration in accordance with the
purchasing bylaw. And the council
approved the establishment of a new
capital project in the amount of
5,400,000
to support transit electrification
project implementation costs with
funding to be transferred from reserve
uh number 119 transit levy
>> moved by deputy mayor Singh. Any
comments, questions? All in favor? That
carries. Further chair, item 15.55 was
also approved on consent and was not
considered in close session. The
[snorts] directions uh therein are
deemed given, including the following
motion arise and be considered in open
session. that the agreement of purchase
between the city and 1580160
Ontario Limited um dated June 6, 2026
for the acquisition of the property
interests therein described be approved
and ratified by council and that the
commissioner public works and
engineering be delegated authority to
execute on behalf of the city any
agreements or other documents necessary
for the completion of the property
acquisition pursuant to the city's
agreement
um with 158060 Ontario Limited. dated
June 6, 2026 on terms acceptable to the
senior manager realy services in a form
acceptable to the city solicitor.
>> This is moved by councelor tour. Any
comments or questions? Seeing none, all
in favor? That carries
>> and further chair just finally items uh
item 15.7 had been withdrawn. It was not
considered. Items 15.6, 15.8 8 and 15.9
were all considered in close session and
direction was given for each item.
>> Thank you very much, Madame Clerk.
Seeing nothing further on our agenda,
councelor Power.
>> Can can we?
>> So, Madame Clerk, we're having a
discussion here with regards to one of
the items
>> through Mr. Chair. Uh yes inform gave
that uh uh their ask has been addressed
by council and and uh uh we have clear
direction uh with respect to saying
>> thank you very much Mr. Ross. So with
that that finishes today's business.
Committee is next scheduled to meet on
Wednesday September the 16th 2026 at
9:30 a.m. I have a motion moved by
councelor Power to adjourn.
>> All Mr. Chair
>> Councelor Plesi please.
>> Thank you very much Mr. Chair. Mr.
Chair, given the fact that we have
referred items that were on the agenda
here today, is it safe to say that we
have a commitment of a July council
meeting? And I guess by you need six
members to make that um to to commit to
that. So I'm happy to have a vote here
today if that's what we want.
>> Councelor Power.
>> Well, we're happy to proceed with that
meeting. I believe that was the
discussion we had. July
>> July 8th.
>> What would the clerk
>> What would the clerks like?
>> Ask the clerk to clarify
>> with respect to the July 8th meeting of
council.
>> Uh through you chair. Uh it is a
tentative meeting and council is able to
confirm that it is
the next city council meeting if
>> yes through a motion.
>> Okay. Happy to put that motion forward.
Thank you, Mr. Chair. So we have a
motion that the July 8th meeting of
council proceed.
Any questions?
All in favor? That carries. And so with
that, I have a motion moved by councelor
Power to adjourn today's meeting. All in
favor? That carries. Thank you very
much.