Overall note
The provided material comprises multiple City Council meeting sections, covering planning/variance applications across several addresses. Key outcomes include a mix of approved variances (often with conditions), some hearings with no public input, and a few motions either pending or-denied in different segments. Public notification and processing specifics were variably raised (including typographical corrections, notice clarity, and conservation authority coordination).
Meeting 1 — Planning Act Minor Variances Hearing (No file number listed)
Meeting 2 — Application 145-2025 (Typographical error/public notice correction)
- Participants (as listed)
- Madam Chair; Madam Secretary-Treasurer; Miss Price; Mr. Bdano; Joris Kieran (agent); Mr. Simon; Priya Gifin.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The meeting discusses a typographical error in the public notice for Application 145-2025 and begins handling the associated variance for 238 Riverside Drive. Public input activities are noted as minimal.
- Five most important topics
1) Declaration of Pecuniary Interests/Deferrals
- No declarations or deferrals initially; a resident raised a hand but no application had been called yet.
2) Typographical Error in Public Notice
- Jordano (David Small Designs) noted the notice described “construction of a new two-story dwelling” vs. the correct “two-story addition with porches.” He stated, "It does not affect the requested variances or application information submitted by us." The committee agreed to address this during motion phase.
3) Front Yard Setback (Application 145-2025)
- The primary variance concerns front yard setback at 238 Riverside Drive for a two-story addition; Jordano explained the change is driven by the front porch.
4) Presentation of Visual Materials
- Jordano presented slides including a front façade view with a red arrow marking the variance; he asserted the design fits the street character.
5) Public Input and Committee Discussion
- Secretary-Treasurer confirmed no public calls or online comments were received; deliberations proceeded with no questions from Members.
- File numbers discussed
- Opportunities for public input
- The Secretary-Treasurer invited input during discussion, but none were received.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion to Correct Typographical Error in Public Notice
- Title: Correction of Typographical Error in Public Notice for Application 145-2025.
- Outcome: To be addressed during the motion phase at the end of the meeting.
2) Motion on Variance Request for Front Yard Setback (Application 145-2025)
- Title: Approval of Variance Request for Front Yard Setback at 238 Riverside Drive.
- Outcome: Pending committee deliberation and vote.
- Follow-up actions
- If approved, the corrected public notice will be issued and the variance will proceed per staff recommendations.
- Councillors present
- Not specified in this segment.
Meeting 3 — Application 146 of 2025 (511 Wildwood Drive)
- Participants
- Miss Price (moved the motion); Mr. Bdano (variance explanation under Planning Act Section 451); Joris Kieran (agent for Application 146); Madam Chair; Mr. Simon; Priya Gifin.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The committee discusses a two-story addition variance at 511 Wildwood Drive. The application was approved with conditions, and staff notes on site plan/elevations inform the decision.
- Five topics
1) Variance for Two-Story Addition
- The variance reduces the minimum front yard to 5.8 m; Miss Price asserted it meets the act and intent, and the application was approved with conditions.
- Quote: "I believe the proposed variance meets the forest of the planning act, maintaining the general intent and purpose of the official plan and zoning bylaw."
2) Approval Conditions
- Conditions require construction in general accordance with site plan dated Sept 15, 2025 and elevations dated May 2025; approval expires two years from decision if no permit issued.
3) Scaled-Back Design for Second Application
- Kieran explained the second application uses a scaled-back design with reduced massing and more articulation.
- Quote: "What you're being presented with tonight is sort of a scaled-back reduced version of what was originally presented."
4) Floor Area Variance (Second Application)
- The second application seeks a floor area variance for features (e.g., spice kitchen, main floor full bath, second-floor laundry); applicant stated the home is for the owner's family.
- Quote: "This home is being built for the owner and his family... It's not a home for resale."
5) Neighborhood/Streetscape Integration
- The designer argued the dwelling will integrate well with the streetscape; staff and committee considered massing and articulation.
- Quote: "The house is sitting nestled into the streetscape very nicely."
- File numbers discussed
- Opportunities for public input
- No public letters of opposition were received for the first application; pre-consultation discussions involved staff.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion for Application 146 of 2025 (Two-Story Addition)
- Title: Approval of Minor Variance for Two-Story Addition.
- Outcome: Approved unanimously with conditions.
- Follow-up actions: Construction per site plan/elevations; two-year permit expiry if not issued.
2) Motion for Floor Area Variance (Second Application)
- Title: Approval of Floor Area Variance for Single-Family Dwelling.
- Outcome: Pending further discussion (not fully detailed here).
- Follow-up actions
- Deliberations on the second application; further decision anticipated after staff/revisions.
- Councillors present
- Not listed in this segment.
Meeting 4 — Application 148 of 2025 (252 Winford Place)
- Participants
- Miss Price (moved motion); Mr. Bdano (variance explanation); Joris Kieran (agent); Madam Chair; Mr. Simon; Priya Gifin.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The committee approves Application 148 of 2025 for a small addition above the garage at 252 Winford Place, with parking considerations and explicit conditions. The decision aligns with neighborhood precedent and site plans.
- Five topics
1) Approval of Application 148 of 2025
- The variance for a small addition above the garage was approved; the site plan elevations date Sept 29, 2025 guided approval.
- Quote: "I find that it meets the Portesta planning act... there’s sufficient articulation in the design to mitigate any impact."
2) Parking Concerns Addressed
- The applicant/agent argued the site plan provides sufficient parking (four cars plus two in the garage).
- Quote: "That driveway is going to hold at least four cars, if not more, plus the two in the garage."
3) Conditions for Approval
- Two conditions: construction generally in accordance with site plan elevations dated Sept 29, 2025; variance expires if no building permit within two years.
- (Implicit policy: standard variances with expiry.)
4) Construction Timeline and Permit Issues
- Emphasis on obtaining a building permit within two years to maintain approval.
5) Neighborhood Precedent
- Emphasized that similar additions nearby have not altered neighborhood character; cites examples at nearby Winford Place properties.
- Quote: "Those additions have not altered the established character of the neighborhood."
- File numbers discussed
- Opportunities for public input
- A resident raised parking concerns during the discussion; no broader public input noted.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion to Approve Application 148 of 2025
- Title: Approval of Application 148 of 2025 for 252 Winford Place.
- Outcome: Passed unanimously.
- Follow-up actions: Compliance with site plan/elevations; building permit within two years.
- Follow-up actions
- Ensure compliance with approved plans; obtain permit within the two-year window.
- Councillors present
- Not listed in this segment.
Meeting 5 — Structural/HVAC changes and variance considerations (No file number)
- Participants
- Madam Chair; Mr. Hardcastle (moved the motion for approval); Mr. Colin; unnamed Agent; Madam Secretary Treasurer.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The discussion centers on interior structural/HVAC changes and whether a variance can proceed given unchanged site plans. The committee emphasizes conformance with four tests and notes no public input has been received.
- Five topics
1) Structural and HVAC Changes to Building Plans
- The agent describes interior structural/HVAC changes and notes they do not alter the site plan/elevations.
- Quote: "The elevation is still the same. Site plan is still the same. It's only interior changes..."
2) Variance Approval Process
- Clarification that a variance can be approved if site plan/elevations remain unchanged from the submission.
- Quote: "As long as your elevation drawings and site plans dated October 14, 2025, have not changed, then we're okay to proceed."
3) Public Interest/Participation
- Secretary-Treasurer confirms no public involvement or calls.
- Quote: "There have been no calls and nobody online that's present has their hand up."
4) Conformance with the Four Tests of the Act
- Emphasis on ensuring the variance meets four tests, including compatibility with area character.
- Quote: "I don't believe that the addition of a GFA over the existing garage will significantly impact upon the character of the area."
5) Conditions for Approval
- Motion includes standard conditions: construction per site plan/elevations; expiry two years if no permit.
- Quote: "That motion would be subject to two conditions..."
- File numbers discussed
- Opportunities for public input
- Not noted in this segment beyond prior/ongoing channels.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion for Approval of Variance
- Title: Approval of Variance for GFA Addition Over Existing Garage
- Outcome: Passed.
- Conditions: Construction per site plan/elevations; expiry two years if no permit.
- Follow-up actions
- Ensure permit process aligns with approved plans; act within two-year window.
- Councillors present
Meeting 6 — Application 149 of 2025 (1306 Lakeshore Road West)
- Participants
- Mr. Demchek (presenter); Madam Chair; Madam Secretary-Treasurer; Mr. Task (moved the motion for approval); Agent Sarah Corba noted in this section.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The committee approves the redevelopment of 1306 Lakeshore Road West, demolishing the existing dwelling and garage to construct a new two-story dwelling with conservation authority compliance and lake-setback considerations. The project is described as modern, compliant with environmental constraints, and neighborhood-compatible.
- Five topics
1) Approval of Application 149 of 2025
- The application for redevelopment is approved; no opposition noted.
- Quote: "The application has been approved. None opposed."
2) Proposed Development Details
- A 596-square-meter two-story dwelling is designed to fit the lot constraints and meet conservation requirements.
- Quote: "The dwelling is a 596-square-meter, two-story structure designed to fit the unique lot dimensions and comply with conservation authority requirements."
3) Conservation Authority Compliance
- Emphasized that a permit from the conservation authority has been issued for setback and environmental considerations.
- Quote: "A permit has been issued by the conservation authority for this proposed setback limit."
4) Architectural Design Features
- Large rectangular windows, flat/tiered roof styling; the design aims for lake views and massing that respects the street.
- Quote: "The front facade features large rectangular windows... the flat roof incorporates a tier design."
5) Proposed Variances
- Five variances are required mainly due to Lake Ontario setbacks.
- Quote: "A total of five variances are proposed to accommodate the proposed dwelling, some of which are triggered due to the required setbacks from Lake Ontario."
- File numbers discussed
- Application 149 of 2025 (Lakeshore West).
- Opportunities for public input
- No explicit public input opportunity noted in this section; earlier stages may have included input through consultative processes.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion: Approval of Application 149 of 2025
- Title: Approval of Variances for 1306 Lakeshore Road West
- Outcome: Passed unanimously.
- Next steps: Demolition and construction per approved variances and Conservation Authority guidelines.
- Follow-up actions
- Proceed with demolition and construction within approved variances and permit requirements.
- Councillors present
- Not listed in this section.
Meeting 7 — Front-yard/Setback and Lakeshore West discussion (3 m setback segment)
- Participants
- Mr. Dicki; Mr. Taskski; Mr. Saltzman (neighbor); Mr. Jek (presenting); Madam Chair; Madam Secretary Treasurer.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- A proposal for a two-story dwelling with a notably smaller front-yard setback (3 meters) is under consideration. The discussion centers on massing, streetscape impact, and adherence to Livable by Design guidelines, with neighbor concerns about notification and massing.
- Five topics
1) Proximity of the Proposed Dwelling to the Road
- Dicki critiques the shallow setback and massing; Jek explains rear yard constraints and massing strategies.
- Quote: "You’re cramming that house right up against the road." (Dicki)
2) Shoreline/Setback Design Considerations
- Neighborhood massing and massing relief measures discussed, with reference to lot positioning on Lakeshore Road West.
3) Rear/Setback Constraints by the Bank
- The discussion includes setbacks related to the toe of the bank and slope stability.
- Quote: "The 20-meter setback is the required setback from the stable toe of bank... and there's also the slope stability requirement..." (Agent)
4) Height and Streetscape Impact
- The dwelling’s two-story massing and alignment with adjacent properties contrasted with the existing one-story houses.
5) Conservation Authority Coordination
- The applicant notes coordination with conservation authorities; there was mention of permitting considerations.
- File numbers discussed
- Opportunities for public input
- Mr. Saltzman participated; no formal public input opportunities detailed beyond standard process.
- Motions and outcomes
- 1) Motion to Approve Variance (GFA addition over garage)
- Title: Approval of Variance for GFA Addition Over Existing Garage
- Outcome: Passed (details indicate approval with conditions, though specific condition language is not quoted here).
- Follow-up actions
- Further review and potential revision to address massing concerns and Livable by Design guidelines.
- Councillors present
Meeting 8 — 174 Chartwell Road (Public notification and variances)
- Participants
- Mr. Jek (presenter), Miss Price, Madam Chair, Madam Secretary Treasurer, Mr. Saltzman (neighbor).
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The applicant presents a new two-story dwelling at 174 Chartwell Road with multiple variances (front yard, side yard, height). The discussion focuses on notification clarity and whether the design adheres to Livable by Design guidelines while addressing neighbor concerns.
- Five topics
1) Front Yard and Design Features
- The applicant’s massing and the front yard proximity to the street are discussed (front yard setback concerns).
2) Setbacks and Pool/Driveway
- The plan includes a driveway and landscape features that affect front-yard and streetscape.
3) Conservation Authority Permits
- Permits from conservation authorities and town are required for features like pools and landscaping.
4) Public Notification
- Mr. Saltzman raises concerns about notice clarity; the chair acknowledges the need for clearer communication.
5) Public Consultation Process
- The meeting suggests opportunities for public input and ongoing consultation for future applications.
- File numbers discussed
- No specific file number indicated in this section.
- Opportunities for public input
- Mr. Saltzman spoke; there were opportunities to provide input during the meeting.
- Motions and outcomes
- 1) Motion to Approve Proposed New Dwelling
- Title: Approval of Variances for 174 Chartwell Road
- Outcome: Not explicitly stated in this section; further discussion required.
- 2) Motion to Address Public Notification Clarity
- Outcome: Not explicitly decided in this segment; acknowledged by Chair.
- Follow-up actions
- Additional clarification and review; potential revisions based on Livable by Design guidelines and neighbor input.
- Councillors present
Meeting 9 — 463 Candler Road (Application 152 of 2025)
- Participants
- Mr. Barton; Mr. Dick; Miss Price; Madam Chair; Madam Secretary Treasurer; Peter Jordano (representing other party in this cluster).
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The council considers variance requests for 463 Candler Road (Garage floor area and height). The committee approves with conditions; a separate discussion addresses related concerns from a neighbor about notification and process.
- Five topics
1) Variance for Garage Floor Area and Height
- The applicant requests a 50-square-foot increase in garage area and a slight roof-height increase; Barton emphasizes integration with the dwelling and non-dominance of the garage.
- Quote: "The garage is not the dominant feature of the property..."
2) Public Input
- Secretary-Treasurer confirms no public calls or objections.
- Quote: "There have been no calls and no one has their hand up."
3) Approval Conditions
- Conditions require adherence to site plan/elevations dated Oct 8, 2025; expiry two years from decision if no permit issued.
- Quote: "construction must align with the site plan and elevations dated October 8, 2025."
4) Application 152 of 2025 Context
- The 463 Candler Road file number and related variances are reviewed; formal approval is sought.
5) Objections/Communication
- Mr. Jordano expresses dissatisfaction with planning staff’s lack of prior communication; this is noted as a concern for future processes.
- File numbers discussed
- Application 152 of 2025 (463 Candler Road).
- Opportunities for public input
- No calls or online participation recorded for this specific variance.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion to Approve Variance 152 of 2025
- Title: Approval of Variance for 463 Candler Road
- Outcome: Unanimously approved.
- Conditions: As above (site plan/elevations Oct 8, 2025; expiry two years from decision date if no permit).
- Follow-up actions
- Ensure building permit submission within two-year window; comply with plan elevations.
- Councillors present
Meeting 10 — 463 Candler Road (Hansen Shia; A12025)
- Participants
- Hansen Shia (owner); Shane Edwards (Houston Design Studio) or similar; Mr. Jordan; Mr. Demchek; Mr. Dicki (commenting); Mr. Towski (mentioned in other sections); Admired chairs.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- This section reviews an alternative presentation of the 463 Candler Road project, emphasizing the massing and setback discussions, as well as conservation authority coordination. The discussion includes objections and clarifications about not exceeding massing and setback allowances.
- Five topics
1) Front Yard Setback and Massing
- The presenter argues the massing is balanced with neighborhood character; concerns about massing and setbacks persisted among some members.
2) Side Yard/Setback and Shoreline Engineering
- The discussion references setbacks from the riverbank and stabilization constraints; coordination with shoreline engineers is highlighted.
3) Livable by Design and Neighborhood Compatibility
- The presenter discusses alignment with Livable by Design guidelines, indicating some elements may require adjustments for massing.
4) Public Notification and Transparency
- Some participants express concerns about public notice clarity, with calls for improved communication for future projects.
5) Conservation Authority Coordination
- Emphasized that extensive coordination with the conservation authority has occurred and is critical to siting.
- File numbers discussed
- No explicit file number in this segment.
- Opportunities for public input
- General public input opportunities exist via committee processes; a neighbor’s objection is discussed earlier.
- Motions and outcomes
- No specific motions detailed in this segment; discussion continues.
- Follow-up actions
- Further refinement to align with Livable by Design guidelines and conservation requirements.
- Councillors present
Meeting 11 — 579 Stone Cliff Road (A12025)
- Participants
- Shane Edwards (Houston Design Studio); Mr. Barton; Mr. Dicki; Mr. Tur; Curtis (colleague); Mr. Jordan.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The committee denies an application for a two-story building (Meeting 11), citing massing concerns and lack of alignment with design guidelines. The record shows a denial of the application and a subsequent discussion on related variances and potential deferred/resubmitted proposals.
- Five topics
1) Denial of Two-Story Building
- The committee denies the application due to mass and massing concerns; a member stated, "I do not believe the variance is being requested or minor or desirable in their current form."
2) Public Notification Clarifications
- Mr. Saltzman seeks clarity on notice; the staff explains how notices are issued and how to access related information.
3) 174 Chartwell Road (File #150 of 2025)
- The discussion introduces a new file with increased variances (two-story addition and related setbacks).
4) Design Guidelines and Setbacks
- Several participants criticize the massing and facade treatments; the group emphasizes adherence to Livable by Design.
5) Environmental/Tree Preservation
- The discussion touches on trees and the impacts on the right-of-way; efforts to preserve municipal trees are noted.
- File numbers discussed
- Application A12025 (579 Stone Cliff Road); Meeting 12 also references File #150 of 2025 for Chartwell Road.
- Opportunities for public input
- Mr. Saltzman and others provide input; at times public input is noted as limited or unclear in prior notices.
- Motions and outcomes
- 1) Motion to Deny the Application for a Two-Story Building
- Title: Denial of Application for Two-Story Building
- Outcome: Denied unanimously or with majority support (per section text).
2) Application A12025 (579 Stone Cliff Road) – Variances
- Title: Approval of Variances for 579 Stone Cliff Road
- Outcome: Not explicitly stated in this section; further review indicated.
- Follow-up actions
- Applicant may revise and resubmit; further deliberations required.
- Councillors present
Meeting 12 — 248 Morris Drive (Application 125 of 2025)
- Participants
- Mr. Barton; Mrs. Saltzman?; Mr. Barton; Mr. Todd; Ms. Corba? (noted).
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The committee defers Application 125 of 2025 to address staff concerns, then later approves a reduced set of variances (floor area ratio only). The discussion emphasizes revision in response to staff feedback to meet planning requirements.
- Five topics
1) Deferred Application
- The application was deferred from September 3rd to address staff concerns; modifications reduce variances to a single floor area ratio.
- Quote: “Since that time, we have removed three of the four variances, including bringing the height down to the maximum. Now we’re just asking for a floor area ratio.”
2) Front/Side Yard Setbacks
- Original discussion included concerns about setbacks; the revised plan reduces variances and better aligns with staff guidance.
3) Massing and Visual Impact
- The revised plan emphasizes massing reductions to better fit the streetscape.
4) Public Input/Notification
- No explicit public input; standard process remains.
5) Compliance with Staff Recommendations
- Emphasized coordination with staff to revise the design for acceptance.
- File numbers discussed
- Application 125 of 2025 (248 Morris Drive) – deferred.
- Opportunities for public input
- Public input opportunities exist via the committee process; no specific input in this section.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion to Deny or Approve (not clearly delineated here)
- Title: Application 125 of 2025 (248 Morris Drive)
- Outcome: Deferred; subsequent motion to approve variances reduced to floor area ratio only.
- Follow-up actions
- Await committee decision on the revised application.
- Councillors present
Meeting 13 — 1306 Lakeshore West (Application 149 of 2025)
- Participants
- Mr. Demchek (presenter); Madam Chair; Mr. Jordan; Mr. Jek; Mr. Dick; Mr. Towski; Ms. secretary-treasurer (as noted).
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- The project at 1306 Lakeshore Road West was approved, with a focus on massing, setbacks, and environmental constraints. The plan includes a modern two-story dwelling with attention to energy and landscape, consistent with neighborhood character.
- Five topics
1) Proposed New Construction and FAR
- The applicant proposed a two-story replacement with a conservative FAR; the plan emphasizes alignment with Livable Oakville/Forest planning principles.
- Quote: “Approving this modest FAR will not set precedents for uncontrolled intensification... it presents a reasonable and context-appropriate renewal.”
2) Architectural Design/Character
- The design emphasizes prairie-inspired elements, massing control, and alignment with surrounding architecture.
3) Conservation Authority Compliance
- The project required permits and coordination with the conservation authority; staff notes confirm permits exist.
- Quote: “A permit has been issued by the conservation authority for this proposed setback limit.”
4) Public Input/Notifications
- There is a neighbor objection noted, but the overall public input remains limited.
- Quote: “The neighbor expressed concern (objector) about massing and setbacks.”
5) Variances and Compliance
- The discussion includes multiple variances (setbacks, floor area ratio, etc.) and their interplay with environmental constraints.
- File numbers discussed
- Application 149 of 2025 (Lakeshore West).
- Opportunities for public input
- Public input opportunities exist via the committee process; a neighbor letter of objection is noted.
- Motions and outcomes
1) Motion to Approve Variance (for 463 Candler Road, etc.)
- Title: Approval of Variance Application for New Residential Build
- Outcome: Pending/Not explicitly stated here; continued discussion noted.
- Follow-up actions
- Final decision anticipated after more deliberations on variances and environmental constraints.
- Councillors present
Meeting 14 — 463 Candler Road (Additional discussion; A12025)
- Participants
- Mr. Edwards (presenter for 463 Candler), Madam Chair, Mr. Dicki, Mr. Towski, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Barton, etc.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- A revised 463 Candler Road variance presentation with emphasis on massing and setback; the discussion centers on addressing public concerns and staff coordination with conservation requirements.
- Five topics
1) Front Yard and Massing
- The presenter argues reduced massing to fit the streetscape; concerns persist about front yard proximity.
2) Side Yard and Pier Projection
- A 20-inch pier projection is discussed as a minor variance element; the main dwelling remains compliant.
3) Livable by Design and Neighborhood Compatibility
- The discussion stresses alignment with design guidelines; concerns about massing and roofline are noted.
4) Public Input
- Secretary-Treasurer notes no public input was received.
5) Conservation Authority Coordination
- Emphasizes extensive coordination over the last year; pre-application discussions with conservation authorities are highlighted.
- File numbers discussed
- No explicit file number in this section.
- Opportunities for public input
- General opportunities exist via historic/ongoing process; neighbor concerns discussed.
- Motions and outcomes
- 1) Motion to Approve Variance (unclear in this section)
- Follow-up actions
- Additional staff review and potential design adjustments.
- Councillors present
Meeting 15 — 579 Stone Cliff Road — Denial and subsequent variances (Additional coverage)
- Participants
- Noted: Mr. Barton; Mr. Dicki; Mr. Towski; Shane Edwards; Mr. Jordan; etc.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- Denial of a two-story building variance for 579 Stone Cliff Road; discussion of future steps includes possible resubmission and addressing massing concerns.
- Five topics
1) Denial of Two-Story Building
- A massing-focused concern leads to denial; the statement: "I do not believe the variance is being requested or minor or desirable in its current form."
2) Public Notification Clarifications
- The public notification process is discussed for clarity and access to information.
3) Revisions and Future Submissions
- Discussion of presenting a revised plan for a future application; massing adjustments may be required.
4) Neighborhood Character
- Comments emphasize compatibility with surrounding homes and avoiding negative streetscape impact.
5) Environmental and Community Impacts
- Additional considerations about trees and shoreline context may be addressed in future submissions.
- File numbers discussed
- Not explicitly stated here; references to Chartwell/A12025 appear in other meetings.
- Opportunities for public input
- Not explicitly noted in this segment.
- Motions and outcomes
- 1) Motion to Deny the Application for a Two-Story Dwelling
- Title: Denial of Application for Two-Story Dwelling
- Outcome: Denied; final decision pending follow-up actions.
- Follow-up actions
- The applicant may revise and resubmit; further deliberations required.
- Councillors present
Meeting 16 — 463 Candler Road (Second/Additional Application coverage)
- Participants
- Mr. Edwards; Madam Chair; Mr. Dicki; Mr. Towski; Mr. Saltzman; Mr. Michael Barton (attorney/agent).
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- Additional coverage of 463 Candler Road variance requests, focusing on FAR, setbacks, and design refinements with ongoing public input considerations.
- Five topics
1) FAR vs. Zoning Bylaw
- Discussion on residential floor area ratio: the applicant argues 47% is modest and contextual; council questions whether it constitutes a minor variance.
- Quote: “To me, the difference between 41% and 47%... means the house is going to be 14.6% bigger than the zoning bylaw on the residential floor area.”
2) Open-to-Below and Massing
- The discussion addresses the impact of open-to-below areas on livable space and overall massing.
- Quote: “It's about half of that amount” (clarifying livable space related to open-to-below).
3) Front Yard Setback and Garage Roof Encroachment
- The front setback and a garage roof encroachment are evaluated for compliance with setback rules; the encroachment is described as permissible.
- Quote: "That is a permissible encroachment."
4) Neighborhood Character and Comparisons
- The applicant references nearby homes with similar or greater FAR to argue consistency with the neighborhood.
- Quote: "The home next to it... is 2% higher... and the home directly across the street... is about 49%."
5) Public Input and Transparency
- Secretary-Treasurer notes lack of public input; attendees are reminded of consultation opportunities.
- File numbers discussed
- No explicit file number in this segment.
- Opportunities for public input
- Public input is generally possible; the neighbor objection is acknowledged in other parts.
- Motions and outcomes
- 1) Motion to Approve Variance Application (for new build)
- Title: Approval of Variance Application for New Residential Build
- Outcome: Not stated here; subsequent sections show denial or further review in some runs.
- Follow-up actions
- Review by council and potential revision.
- Councillors present
Meeting 17 — 174 Chartwell Road (Follow-up on public notification)
- Participants
- Mr. Saltzman; Mr. Jek; Madam Chair; etc.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- Public notification issues and concerns about the appearance and massing of a new dwelling at Chartwell Road are revisited, with emphasis on accurate notice details and neighbor engagement.
- Five topics
1) Public Notification Clarity
- Saltzman reiterates confusion about the notice, and the chair emphasizes the need for clear communication.
2) Massing/Setbacks
- The massing and setbacks are discussed in relation to Livable by Design guidelines.
3) Landscape/Conservation Coordination
- Ongoing coordination with authorities for setbacks and environmental protection is noted.
4) Public Involvement
- The meeting underscored opportunities for public input during formal processes.
5) Next Steps
- Additional clarifications and potential design adjustments as the process continues.
- File numbers discussed
- None specified in this segment.
- Opportunities for public input
- Public input opportunities exist via hearings/notice; Saltzman participated.
- Motions and outcomes
- No formal motion recorded in this segment.
- Follow-up actions
- Await further staff review and potential revisions.
- Councillors present
Meeting 18 — 1306 Lakeshore West (Revisit or parallel discussion)
- Participants
- Mr. Demchek; Madam Chair; Mr. Jordan; Mr. Jek; etc.
- High-level summary (2-3 sentences)
- Additional discussions around 1306 Lakeshore West (Application 149 of 2025) focusing on design refinements, setbacks, and conservation authority alignment; no new motions captured here beyond earlier approvals.
- Five topics
1) Massing and Setbacks
- Emphasizes the massing of new structure and the relation to the setback constraints from the bank.
2) Conservation Authority Coordination
- Ongoing coordination is highlighted as a critical factor.
3) Open-to-Below Considerations
- Addressed in the context of floor area and livable space implications.
4) Public Input
- No new public input indicated in this segment.
5) Design Alignment with Guidelines
- The applicant stresses alignment with local guidelines, with staff input guiding refinements.
- File numbers discussed
- Opportunities for public input
- General processes apply; specific input not recorded here.
- Motions and outcomes
- No new motions recorded in this segment; previous approvals stand.
- Follow-up actions
- Implementation per previously approved plan; monitor for any further modifications if required.
- Councillors present
Councillor presence (summary)
Across the bundled transcripts, individual meetings frequently list participants by role or by name for specific applications. When names are provided, they include chairs, secretaries, and various applicants/agents (e.g., Miss Price, Mr. Bdano, Joris Kieran, Mr. Demchek, Mr. Dicki, Mr. Saltzman, Shane Edwards, Peter Jordano, etc.). The texts do not consistently enumerate a single fixed council roster for each meeting segment; where names are not given, I have indicated that the councillors present are not listed in that segment.
How to participate or contact for public input
- General process referenced across sections:
- For public input on items, use designated contact channels noted in each meeting (often the Secretary-Treasurer or a similar administrative contact) and attend the public hearing or webinar as instructed in notices.
- For specific items, note that notices and agendas are published on the city’s website, and residents can contact the Secretary-Treasurer to confirm hearing schedules and process.
Motions and outcomes (summary across sections)
- Several motions were recorded across the meetings:
- Correction of typographical error in public notice (Application 145-2025) – to be addressed during motion phase.
- Approval of Front Yard Setback Variance at 238 Riverside Drive (Application 145-2025) – pending deliberation.
- Approval of Variance for Two-Story Addition (Application 146 of 2025) – approved unanimously with conditions.
- Approval of Application 148 of 2025 (252 Winford Place) – unanimously approved with two conditions (site plan/elevations; two-year permit expiry).
- Approval of Variance for GFA Addition Over Existing Garage (no file shown) – approved with two conditions.
- Approval of Variance for 1306 Lakeshore West (Application 149 of 2025) – approved unanimously with standard conditions.
- Denial of an application for a Two-Story Dwelling (Meeting 11/12) – denied with comments on massing and guidelines.
- Notes on deferrals and pending decisions are present in several sections (e.g., Application 125 of 2025; 174 Chartwell Road; 174 Chartwell Road public-notice discussion).
If you’d like, I can reformat this into a clean, compact per-meeting table or extract only a specific subset of meetings (e.g., only those with file numbers) for a quicker skim.