High-level summary

The February 6, 2026 General Issues Committee Budget Meeting covered late agenda additions, procedural clarifications, and a range of budget-related motions impacting recycling programs, library funding, park maintenance, and public safety. Key outcomes included approving the agenda, moving several items into in-camera review, allocating funds to support businesses affected by provincial recycling changes, and imposing deferrals on several budget items to allow for staff analysis and public consultation.

Five most important topics discussed

1) Transition and funding of the Business Recycling program; public outreach and provincial responsibility - The council discussed the province’s changes to recycling and how businesses would be affected, emphasizing outreach and clarity. A director noted the urgency of informing stakeholders: “Not approving this would have an absolutely detrimental impact to those that have been deemed not eligible without any consultation.” The discussions also covered coordination with provincial policy and the need for robust outreach to affected property owners and businesses. File references: PW25088 (Public Works contingency analysis) and general recycling transition notes.

2) Contingency usage and budget discipline in Public Works - The meeting reviewed contingency usage for completed public works projects and the potential to reduce contingency allocations to free up funds. Data cited included that actual contingency use was far lower than applied: “the average applied contingency rate... was 12%, but only 3% was actually spent” for some project bands. A 3% reduction proposal would generate roughly $593,000 in available funding, with staff directed to monitor and report by Q3 2026. File: PW25088.

3) Library budget pressures, reserves, and provincial funding shifts - The Hamilton Public Library faced increased operating pressures due to provincial cuts in health and housing supports. The library sought to maintain service levels with a budget up to 5.25% in some discussions, while the mayor’s directive emphasized a 4.25% target. Quotes highlight the tension: “Libraries are at the point where they're saying we can't sustain providing all the services we need to at this budget marker,” and “This is not the city's obligation. It is the province's regulation.” Public input was acknowledged as possible through broader budget discussions. File: FCS 260001 (reserve-related discussions); library budget documents referenced.

4) Grass-cutting, park naturalization, and non-city lands - A broad set of items addressed grass-cutting in municipal rights-of-way, the naturalization of green spaces, and maintenance in non-city lands. Concerns were raised about maintaining aesthetic standards and the impact on local residents, with notes on volunteer stewardship and potential contract changes. A notable point: “People who maintain this garden are people in their 80s... it’s not a group that can manage a ride-on mower.” Public input opportunities were emphasized in terms of private-property abutments and consultations. File references include various park-maintenance discussions and non-city lands service discussions.

5) Bike facilities and road-rehabilitation coordination - Several motions and discussions focused on aligning bike-lane projects with road resurfacing schedules to avoid duplicative work and delays. A key example cited: deferring a bike facilities project (ID 466242044) to align with the broader road rehabilitation schedule and to realize cost savings. A related concern was Bill 60’s impact on timelines and approvals. Next steps included continuing design work with available funding and revisiting the project in the 2027 budget. File: Project ID 466242044; related road-resurfacing/ rehabilitation notes.

File numbers or bylaw references discussed

• PW25088: Public Works Report analyzing contingency usage.
• FCS 260001: Reserve- and financial-planning-related appendix referenced in reserve discussions.
• FCS 260034: Service mitigation measures memorandum (confidential appendix referenced).
• Item/Project IDs and related notes: 466242044 (Bike Facilities Crossing Red Hill Parkway); 11.1 (labor relations context in one section); Appendix H (mitigation measures); other file references appear throughout the sections.

Opportunities for public input

• Public input opportunities were noted in several sections via broader budget discussions, consultation with BIAs, or direct contact with councillors and city staff. Specific channels mentioned include attending future budget meetings, engaging through town halls or outreach efforts, and direct contact with staff conducting outreach for recycling, library, or park-improvement programs.

Motions and outcomes (passed, rejected, or deferred)

• Approval of Agenda

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Mover: Counselor Crutch; Seconder: Counselor Pauls

• Motion to Call the Question

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Outcome detail: Cleared speaker’s list; all participants proceeded to vote

• Motion to Receive Confidential Memorandum FCS26034 Respecting Service Mitigation Measures

  • Outcome: Passed (unanimous)
  • Details: A) Memorandum received; B) Confidential appendix received and remains confidential

• Motion to Reintroduce Item 7.2

  • Outcome: Passed (reintroduction)
  • Next steps: Further discussion in the next meeting

• Motion to Defer Employee Lunch Funding

  • Outcome: Passed (deferral)
  • Next steps: Return to February 13th meeting with staff information

• Motion to Defer Bike Facilities Crossing Red Hill Parkway Project (ID 466242044)

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Next steps: Move funding to align with the 2027 road-resurfacing project; design work continues

• Motion to Allocate $2.112 Million from the Tax Stabilization Reserve (support for businesses impacted by recycling changes)

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Next steps: Implement outreach and transition and provide post-implementation reporting

• Motion to Maintain City Enrichment Fund Budget at 2025 Level (CF)

  • Outcome: Upheld; maintain CF budget at $6,769,531
  • Next steps: Monitor funding level and consider future adjustments

• Motion to Support Additional Library Funding for Security Costs

  • Outcome: Passed
  • Next steps: Integrate funding to address security costs at Central Library and related facilities

• Motion to Transition to New System for Businesses / Blue Box Extension

  • Outcome: Not fully resolved in the excerpt; multiple motions presented, some deferred or not yet voted

• Motion to Approve Library Budget Increase of 5.25%

  • Outcome: Rejected in the discussed section

• Motion to Transition to Closed Session (Item 11.1)

  • Outcome: Passed

• Motion to Receive Item 7.2 and related actions (reintroduction)

  • Outcome: Passed

• Motion to Amend the Deferral Motion (city-lunch/ meal provision)

  • Outcome: Rejected (not friendly)

• Motion to Cease Services on Non-City-Owned Properties (Sunset Garden etc.)

  • Outcome: Deferred; letters to property owners pending

• Motion to Restore Funding to the Community Enrichment Fund (CEF)

  • Outcome: Not yet decided in the provided excerpt; discussion ongoing

• Motion to Increase or Maintain City Enrichment Fund (various sections)

  • Outcome: Debated; some motions deferred or not yet voted

• Motion to Defer or Revisit City Enrichment Fund decisions (end-of-budget process)

  • Outcome: Noted as a potential future action

Councillors present

• Budget Chair Wilson
• Councillors: Francis, Mark Tatterson (Tatterson), Jackson, Jeff Bey, Esther Pauls, Brad Clark, Rob Cooper, Ted McMein, Cameron Crutch, Narendra Nan, Alex Wilson, Tammy Wang, Craig Kazar
• Mayor Andrea Horvath
• Clerk Trenum
• Additional names appear across sections (e.g., Casar, Nan, Spedaphora, etc.); the provided materials reference a broad roster of attendees and speakers during the meetings. The core list above reflects the primary councillors and municipal leaders named in the most regularly cited sections, along with the mayor and clerk.